Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

une/147869.html -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F| OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: releasing major library change to unstable without coordination

ssl 3.0.0-1 [1]. This would mean that just uploading to experimental and let ci.debian.net do all builds of reverse dependencies would be sufficient, but I'm not sure whether the FTBFS reports are made automatically. [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/streamlink/unstable/amd64/

How to receive a mail on new upstream version

Hi, Is there a way to receive a mail when a new upstream version is released ? I've subscribed to my package on https://tracker.debian.org but I don't receive mails for new upstream releases. Maybe there is other ways ? -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904

Re: Fixed release dates are hurting quality

hrome via boards > > proliant hp and DELL ones! These drivers were reintroduced last friday. -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Making Debian available

hink the main page could have also have a "Other downloads" link to one of the more complete download pages (like /distrib), so users not familiar with the wiki can find it one click away. Maybe I can propose a patch for at least this small link to /distrib -- Alexis Murzeau P

Re: Making Debian available

/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607193 Re-organise the CD / download pages to make them more useful: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819664 - -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: Making Debian available

ther" link under the big Download link pointing to other places ? For example see attachment with "Other architectures and options" linking to: https://www.debian.org/distrib/ And maybe add a link from https://www.debian.org/distrib/ to images with non-free firmwares -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|

Re: Salsa OIDC logins for debtags.debian.org

Hi, Le 10/01/2021 à 22:45, Enrico Zini a écrit : > Hello, > > I've enabled Salsa OIDC logins for debtags.debian.org. Thanks, I could login with Salsa and set debtags for my package :) -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F|

Re: CITL Releasing 7000 defects/vulnerabilities

itl.org Subject: APT-REPOSITORY DEFECT REQUEST for ${XXX} Please include your return e-mail and some way that easily shows you are associated with the package. We will then respond with reproduction information, tools and data that might be needed to identify the defects. -- end quote ---

Re: Trying to get in touch with Sam Hocevar [MIA]

have enough time nowadays, you can take over the package if you want" just to show you are present and reading mails (even if not processing the underlying work they ask for). -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?

If there is still something somewhere, I would be happy to read it :) -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: FTP Team -- call for volunteers

f, the same way if he would have uploaded it to a social media are whatever. That way, the legal responsibility burden is distributed on many peoples instead of a small number. If one is not sure that the software is distributable, he can mail the upstream maintainers for a clue. -- Alexis Murze

Re: spammer closing bug report

bian.org; 2 Mar 2020 13:56:49 + --- -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github

y case. Salsa gitlab's CI can be an alternative but for me debci is sufficient. and I run sbuild before pushing/releasing a version. -- Alexis Murzeau

Re: Consensus Call: Git Packaging Round 1

Le 01/09/2019 à 19:15, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit : > > > On 9/1/19 6:41 PM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: >> I find both arguments quite valid: >> - The BTS is more future proof, stuff on it will probably last longer >> than whatever is on Salsa currently. > > Why? There i

Re: Consensus Call: Git Packaging Round 1

yself ok with the BTS but I have to send sometimes more than one mail to control@b.d.o before having the right action on the bug done (mistyped command, wrong syntax, bad bug status when merging bugs, ...). So it is not as easy to use as a graphical interface. Maybe I should just use command line

Re: Why keep upstream sources in Git at salsa.d.o?

e https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-html-proofer gbp:info: Cloning from 'https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-html-proofer' $ cd ruby-html-proofer/ $ gbp buildpackage "--git-builder=sbuild -v -As -d unstable" \ > --git-export-dir=../build-area gbp:error: upstream/3.11.1 is not a valid treeish ``` I guess I'm missing either a part of git history or just the orig tarball, but what's the normal way to get it ? (maybe there is a doc or wiki somewhere about this ?) -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature