Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-24 Thread Allison Randal
On 02/24/2017 06:25 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > rtslib-fb is a core component for the LIO(-fb) project. We already maintain > configshell-fb and targetcli-fb under pkg-linux-target group. Nod, that makes sense. I'd say you should take on maintenance of the rtslib-fb packages, as long as you're

Re: [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-23 Thread Allison Randal
On 02/21/2017 12:57 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > Sad to see this. But with so much free loading trend, these are bound to > happen. > > For the LIO-fb target in Debian, we've been depending on the rtslib-fb > package, > which you've maintained so far. Should we pick it up un

Re: The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-15 Thread Allison Randal
On 02/15/2017 07:42 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I will continue to maintain OpenStack Newton during the lifetime of > Debian Stretch though, but I don't plan on doing anything more. This > means that maybe, Newton will be the last release of OpenStack in > Debian. If things continue this way, I pro

Re: On init in *Debian*

2012-03-21 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/21/2012 09:22 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > > The primary problem with supporting systemd on kFreeBSD is that it uses > Linux-specific facilities for discovering system events and hence knowing > when to start or stop particular services, and for tracking services so > that it knows when they're

Re: On init in Debian

2012-03-17 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/17/2012 05:20 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > > I don't know what you're asking, which is why I asked you for > clarification of what you mean. > > You asked “if this [requirement for the Canonical contributor agreement > before accepting contributions in ‘upstart’] went away, would it have a > sub

Re: On init in Debian

2012-03-16 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/16/2012 06:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > Which decision in particular, and by who? Anthropologically speaking, folkmoot is a very different system than top-down rule, but both are among a large variety of systems humans use to collaboratively build things larger than a single individual. In

Re: On init in Debian

2012-03-16 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/16/2012 06:54 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 16 mars 2012 à 14:26 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit : >> How are the upstart developers controversial? Did I miss something? > > Canonical contributor agreement. Hypothetically, if this went away, would it have a substantial impact on th

Re: Linux Mint 12 in Debian?

2011-11-28 Thread Allison Randal
On 11/28/2011 10:56 AM, Svante Signell wrote: > Hi, > > As many people (including me) are very disappointed in gnome3, switching > from a very configurable desktop environment in gnome2 to a almost not > configurable tablet one, is there any chance that Debian could supply > the Mint version too,

Re: Bug#643469: ITP: nqp -- Not Quite Perl compiler

2011-09-27 Thread Allison Randal
On 09/27/2011 06:39 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Allison Randal wrote: > Quoting from the nqp README: >> is focused on being a high-level way to create compilers and libraries >> for virtual machines (such as the Parrot Virtual Machin

Re: Bug#643469: ITP: nqp -- Not Quite Perl compiler

2011-09-27 Thread Allison Randal
On 09/27/2011 04:38 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: >> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 14:39:22 Alessandro Ghedini wrote: >>> * Package name: nqp >> >> This "nqp" name is a bit terse. > > That's how it's called. We have many three