latest blanket insult of all DD's and stop being so biased.
YMMV.
Could you pretty please elaborate on this a little bit? It'd be most
interesting to hear your views on LWN's Debian-related coverage in
detail. Perhaps a blog post, should you consider it too off-topic for
-devel?
an.org/News/weekly/2005/07/ and Margarita
Manterola's the author.
Cheers,
--
Andrew Saunders
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tivating participation and how you actually sort of
keep from getting stuck in a rut or something. So... I don't know that
I have any more brilliant ideas than that.
[1]
http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2005/debconf5/mpeg/2005-07-16/08-Structural_Evolution-Bdale_Garbee.mpeg
--
Andrew Saunders
GR amending the DFSG is proposed and
passed, the ambiguity will remain.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/07/msg00435.html
--
Andrew Saunders
On 11/3/05, Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submitted a patch to apt-move to do this to the Debian BTS.
Does it also provide the "symbolic links only" functionality the
parent poster mentioned?
--
Andrew Saunders
ve sold all my Exec-Shield exploits (that still work!),
otherwise I'd offer those as well ;\"
[2] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-03/1315.html
--
Andrew Saunders
On Tue 4 November, spender wrote:
> I've spared you your precious time and gone ahead and done this for
> you.
You might have a better reception if you dropped the attitude.
Anyone reading the thread will quickly form the opinion that maintaining
PaX within Debian would likely require frequent i
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:46:24 +0400
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> persons like me
> are concerned that vendors will strip all information about who wrote
> ReiserFS out except for copyright notices that none of their users
> will see, slap their brand identity onto it, and ship, depriv
8 matches
Mail list logo
