my question is again, is the rules really changed or we bend the
rules just because of one transition?
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 15:15 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi Attila,
>
> On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 09:47 +0100, Attila Szalay wrote:
> > Based on https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerU
Hello Steve,
I do understand your concern about the time_t structure change and I
also admit that there are some room of improvement how the syslog-ng
package manage the library versioned dependency, but this is not the
solution.
Based on https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload, the binNMU sh
Hi,
I have a relatively new package (BoxFort). In the beginning, I used the
"any" architecture in the control so it was (tried to be) compiled on all
architectures. But from the build logs, I realized that currently the
package can only be compiled/used in a very few architectures (amd64,
arm64, i
That option means that the system will create not only the binary
.amd.changes but another changes too which contains only the source
packages. And I would like to use this method to be sure the package
compiles, to be able to run the lintian against the package and even be
able to test it before t
Hi,
I'm struggling with it for a while now and I couldn't find the solution. I
have a package maintained with git-buildpackage. And now, that I "cannot"
upload binary packages I tried to compile the new version with the option
to create a source-only changes file too. But for some reason that chan
For me, the uploaded package was disappeared when I accidentally used a
wrong gpg kez to sign it. It was also mine, just an old, 1024 bit long one.
In that case I received nothing back about the upload.
And about the source-only upload I found another page where there are some
cases, when the sour
Hi,
My concern is less about https (hello iloms), but other kind of protocols.
Ssl vpn, rdp servers, voip, etc. And embedded devices implements this
protocols.
On Aug 8, 2017 7:35 AM, "Stephan Seitz"
wrote:
> On Mo, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:18:38 -0500, Michael Lustfield wrote:
>
>> Is there an actua
Hi All!
On 2003 Jun 03, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> In any case, debian-devel in general is not likely to know, but the buildd
> admin will.
I only ask what can I do.
- Send an email to hppa buildd maintainer
- Send an email to debian-hppa mail list
- Report a bug
- Wait
- Other.
That's all.
Hi All!
What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
# 42 days old (needed 10 days)
# out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
This is with package libzorpll.
--
PGP ID 0x8D143771, /C5 95 43 F8 6F 19 E8 29 53 5E 96 61 05 63 42 D0
GPG ID ABA0E8B2, 45CF B559 82
9 matches
Mail list logo