Hello,
According to [Bashism Wiki](https://mywiki.wooledge.org/Bashism):
The comma operator is widely supported by almost everything except dash and yash -- even posh and Busybox. In ksh93 however, it conflicts with the decimal radix in locales where it's used in floating points instead of perio
Packages must be self-contained, using only their contents and the Debian
repo during the build process. There are multiple technical and
non-technical reasons for this requirement, including knowing that the
package is DFSG-compliant and being able to always rebuild the package.
But I found that
No.
And downloading stuff during the build process is strictly prohibited, not
just discouraged.
Why did you say that? Why Debian prohibit downloading stuffs (including
git clone repository) during build process?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Hello,
In Debian Upstream guide (https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide):
You should never assume that Internet access is available during building. Debian guarantees that every binary package can be built from the available source packages for licensing and security reasons.
Do not assume yo
Hello,
In UpstreamGuide on wiki.d.o, it stated in Manual Page section that:
For executable programs that take arguments, please consider writing a manual page, rather than expecting users to pass --help or similar. Note that generating the man page from --help output (with a tool such as help2ma
12.07.19 um 08:52 schrieb Bagas Sanjaya:
Hello,
I've filed RFP for PCYNLITX sometimes ago [1]:
In PCYNLITX download page [2], it can be installed by using installation
script. However, after examining install
script, I noticed following:
- PCYNLITX doesn't employ version numberi
Hello,
Let's imagine that I will package a city-building game titled makecity. The
game is licensed under GPL(v3), but it has
virtual currency which can be purchased by real money, that is the currency is
"premium currency" (which is hard or
impossible to get freely except by purchasing). Howev
Hello,
I've filed RFP for PCYNLITX sometimes ago [1]:
In PCYNLITX download page [2], it can be installed by using installation
script. However, after examining install
script, I noticed following:
- PCYNLITX doesn't employ version numbering like any other project/packages. It
would be difficul
On 26/06/19 23.09, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
ГI'd say that we should never be touching anything like this.
вт, 25 июн. 2019 г., 7:57 Bagas Sanjaya <mailto:bagasdo...@gmail.com>>:
In order to inform to users, especially parents, about potentially
objectionable con
On 25/06/19 20.19, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Am Di., 25. Juni 2019 um 11:51 Uhr schrieb Bagas Sanjaya :
Simon McVittie:
Appstream metadata, which is canonically provided by upstreams and is
distro- and package-type-agnostic (available in at least apt and Flatpak),
has this as an optional field
Emmanuel Arias:
IMO this idea represent a big work. And if you want to involved
upstream, maybe will be a problem. Some upstream, could not be
interest on participate because could be a "extra" work. But if we
implement a content rating system, the freedom could be affected
because the opinion
Simon McVittie:
Appstream metadata, which is canonically provided by upstreams and is
distro- and package-type-agnostic (available in at least apt and Flatpak),
has this as an optional field for self-rating:
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#tag-content_ratin
On 25/06/19 14.31, Philip Hands wrote:
Bagas Sanjaya writes:
Russ Allbery:
It sounds like a whole ton of work to get a useful amount of coverage (not
to mention bothering upstreams with questionnaires that I suspect many of
them would find irritating -- I certainly would with my upstream hat
what do people think about getting rid of current suite names ("stable",
"testing", "unstable") for most purposes? We already recommend using
codenames instead as those don't change their meaning when a new release
happens.
Hi Ansgar,
Regarding suite names (stable, testing, and unstable), ther
Russ Allbery:
It sounds like a whole ton of work to get a useful amount of coverage (not
to mention bothering upstreams with questionnaires that I suspect many of
them would find irritating -- I certainly would with my upstream hat on),
and I'm not clear on the benefit. Do you have some reason t
Hello Debian Developers,
Debian provides more than 51000 packages. From those packages, some are
appropriate for every ages, and some others are
only for specific age groups for some reasons.
In order to inform to users, especially parents, about potentially
objectionable content in Debian pac
This applies to any program which downloads ads from the
network at runtime. Serious problems with this:
* We don't know what ads might be displayed and whether we would
think them inappropriate, offensive, legally risky, or whatever.
* Downloading ads at runtime is a security risk: it
On 20/06/19 20.11, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting Bagas Sanjaya :
Such ads is displayed only when users have Internet connection, and
there is no way to patch ZZZ in order to remove ads (or we have to
buy "pro" version which doesn't contain ads and adds more features).
S
On 20/06/19 15.49, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting Bagas Sanjaya :
Suppose that an upstream has released a program which its license
conforms to DFSG (named ZZZ), but when I test it, ads placed by the
upstream appear (such as pop up ads). Since ads can affect user
experience of ZZZ, but at
Hello Debian Developers,
Suppose that an upstream has released a program which its license
conforms to DFSG (named ZZZ), but when I test it, ads placed by the
upstream appear (such as pop up ads). Since ads can affect user
experience of ZZZ, but at the same time the upstream get paid by ad
ne
20 matches
Mail list logo
