On 16 April 2016 at 19:20, Niko Tyni wrote:
> For a long time, src:perl has had some limited support for bootstrapping a
> new architecture without /usr/bin/perl. We've gone to quite some trouble
> to avoid needing perl to build perl as far as possible, including quite
> a few sed scripts and a 6
On 4 May 2010 22:54, Niko Tyni wrote:
> unlike earlier versions, perl 5.12.0-1 in experimental is configured with
> the "use64bitint" and "uselongdouble" options on all architectures. I'm
> looking for input on whether this is the right choice for sid.
Sounds like a good idea to me. I had intend
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is why I suggested to integrate liblocale-gettext-perl in perl-base
> itself. This would be the simplest/nicest solution IMO. It would always be
> synchronized with the current perl.
>
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:17:05PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>I don't actually remember the part of this discussion where the real cause of
>the problem with the above rule was discussed, but in case it is about some
>dependencies between the rules (which is the most likely IMHO), then it sh
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:13:53PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>It appears that ExtUtils::MakeMaker, a standard Perl module commonly
>used to generate Makefiles for Perl modules, emits the rule:
>
>install :: all pure_install doc_install
>
>This appears to account for the failure of some of my Perl
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:45:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>[...] upstream considered it completely unacceptable for anyone to
>ship python in such a state that users would end up with less than the
>full python suite installed on their system. [...]
In fairness, Perl upstream had similar pr
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:19:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
>> What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
>> email to $email.'' to make more explicit that they
>> don't need to fill anything out?
>
>There are a whole host
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
>The answer you might give is, "Oh! Send am email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
This may be a simple way to ad
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 04:02:43AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 04:39:12PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> dpkg-statoverride is a tool for the system administrator to specify a
>> different mode or ownership for a file to that which is provided in the
>> package. It is not me
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:54:49PM +0200, Volker Grabsch wrote:
>I propose to add more CPU types to dpkg-architecture. In particular,
>I'd like to see the different i386 architectures there, i.e.
>i586, i686, k6, ...
[...]
>For instance, some programs with lots of calculations (e.g. mplayer)
>are c
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
>for mentors.debian.net I would like to find a perfect (TM) regular
>expression to split the "Version:" line of a control file into:
>
> - epoch
> - upstream version
> - Debian package revision
>
>My current attempt is:
>
> ^(?:(\d+)
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:03:21PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
>> I've been upgrading my machines since Woody to Sarge, then to Etch. Now,
>> my /var/lib/dpkg/available are huge (15MB), and it seems they never get
>> cleaned.
>> How a
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:29:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Glad that you guys will take care of this, as it is way over my head.
It's not complex. The problem manual pages have been generated with a
program [help2man] which interprets a program's --help output.
Unfortunately, it's not p
>dotlock (1) - manual page for dotlock (GNU Mailutils 0.6.93)
This is the default NAME section generated by help2man. Fairly useless,
but there needs to be *some* default.
Suggest that you file bugs on the particular packages which need either
to provide a --name="short description" arg
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:31:58PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> (In fact, IMHO nothing should depends from perl-modules at all).
>>
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 15:44, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
>
>> The current dependencies are used to allow a slightly newer version
>> of perl-modules to be installed: porters had issues in unstable
>> where
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:01:21PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
>On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies li
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:51:59PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 14:40, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
>> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed
>> > b
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
>maintainers.
>
> perl
> perl-modules
These two packages are meant to be installed together, split only for
arch any/all.
I'm a bit puzzled as to why
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:20:28AM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
>I offer to implement a update-ldconfig program that would work the same
>way update-menus work, by checking a lock and forking in the background
>and waiting for the dpkg lock.
It's more than just update-menus and ldconfig. update-m
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
>> previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 09:56:05PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
>>Has anyone had any luck building libwww-perl against perl 5.80
>> yet?
>
>Check http://ftp-master.debian.org/~bod/perl/pool/libw/libwww-perl/
Everything from that pool with the exception of libwww-perl was pushed
into unstable las
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
>make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
>still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
>packages that were alrea
ad:
Timing Trials, or, the Trials of Timing
http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/bwk/interps/pap.html
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633
>Your script could query `apm | grep on-line` or something.
The apmd package contains a little program called /usr/bin/on_ac_power
to determine the AC/battery status.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633
hat dpkg only does that when the maintainer has changed the
script in the newer version.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633
now that netbase has changed the dependency on portmap to a
`suggests' you may remove it anyway.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633
mage-2.4.3-k7
kernel-image-2.4.3-pentium4
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633
3) stable; urgency=low
* make mgetty-fax's postinst create /var/spool/fax/outgoing/.last_run
to close a potential symlink exploit by members of the fax group
that is otherwise possible until that file is created
-- Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:0
sbin/dictd | xargs -r ps
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
14769 ?S 0:00 dictd 1.4.9: 0/0
# pidof -x dictd | xargs -r ps
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
14769 ?S 0:00 dictd 1.4.9: 0/0
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Dea
t really convenient.
Upgrading xdm should not affect the links in /etc/rc?.d as update-rc.d
(called in the postinst) is a no-op if any links for the script already
exist.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW
mp;& apt-get autoclean && \
apt-get -q -d -y -u upgrade
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9809 0133
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:42:54AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
>Speaking of which, where did netdate go? I've been wondering for a
>while what happened to it.
rdate may do what you are after.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com
33 matches
Mail list logo
