Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have little patience for superstitious beliefs, and less still for
people who claim to be defending the tender feelings of the ignorant.
But why use names correlated with evil when other options are
available which interfere less with Debian's
=1version=unstablerelease=all
- Debian Statement about GFDL:
http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
--
Brian T. Sniffen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/
--
Brian T. Sniffen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/
find it useful for
its cryptographic hash-address system and the autowhitelisting code.
-Brian
--
Brian T. Sniffen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Aug 22, Brian T. Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, whether the DFSG should apply to documentation in Debian
is not relevant to the survey, which asks whether the GFDL complies
with the DFSG: we can deal with the insanity of whether
What I'm referring to is the excerpts of C and E-Lisp source in those
manuals. They're clearly both documentation and software, even if you
don't believe that text can be both documentation and software.
I don't believe even the non-optional parts of the GFDL can be found
DFSG-free (as a
with the insanity of whether this software
over here is or is not software later, but figuring out whether the
GFDL is a DFSG-free licence for software is also important. That's
what the survey's asking about.
-Brian
--
Brian T. Sniffen[EMAIL PROTECTED
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nethack is the only game which comes to mind which does this, and I think it
should probably be changed to keep the saved game in the user's home
directory. This was clearly done in order to try to prevent
As far as I am concerned, I have no desire to have ReiserFS distributed
for free by anyone who removes the GNU manifesto or similar expressions
from Stallman's work (or my own) and redistributes it. It is simply a
matter of respect that is due the author.
Respect is due; but it is up to
. On the other hand, if he left the license free
and simply asked that distributors not make such changes, that would
be free and at least somewhat reasonable.
-Brian
--
Brian T. Sniffen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/
10 matches
Mail list logo
