Santiago Vila writes:
> > This information could instead be stored in /etc/lsb-release. One of
> > the reasons for the creation of this file was to standardise across
> > the distributions the name and format of the file which contains this
> > type of information.
>
> Interesting. Is that file in
Santiago Vila writes:
> something other than "2.2" or "testing/unstable" could potentially
> break any script or program which expects /etc/debian_version to be
> either "2.2" or "testing/unstable" (since this is what base-files provides).
> In this case not only there is no benefit from changing
2 matches
Mail list logo
