Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. ... My resume on Daniels point of view is to get a different .so name for gnutls in the very short term and kick off ssl in Debian apps midterm! Tha

Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Daniel Stenberg
s only one available work-around for the short to mid term, and that is to use a separate .so file for libcurl built with GnuTLS. -- -=- Daniel Stenberg -=- http://daniel.haxx.se -=- ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: curl reverts to openssl (but the story does not ends here)

2005-08-09 Thread Daniel Stenberg
derlying SSL lib that is used. This would of course not be ideal or even wanted, but in real life it might still be what we'll have. There, I've stated my opinions. I'll refrain from further replying in this topic now. -- -=- Daniel Stenberg -=- http://daniel.hax

Re: curl reverts to openssl (but the story does not ends here)

2005-08-07 Thread Daniel Stenberg
using either library, OpenSSL and GnuTLS differ not only license-wise but they also have features of their own and bugs of their own. Limiting the libcurl offer to use only one of them will cause grief at some point in some camp(s), that's for sure. -- -=- Daniel Stenber