First call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-13 Thread Debian Project Secretary
--END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- -- In an orderly world, there's always a place for the disorderly. Debian Project Secretary 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-15 Thread Debian Project Secretary
Yes v Do we override foundation documents No manoj -- Excusing bad programming is a shooting offence, no matter _what_ the circumstances. -- Linus Torvalds, to the linux-kernel list Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C pgpTz2ZYcgOCN.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: DFSG violations in Lenny: new proposal

2008-11-10 Thread Debian project secretary
manoj -- Newlan's Truism: An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job. Debian project secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C pgpQPbpXc17ME.pgp Description: PGP signature

Discussion period: GR: DFSG violations in Lenny

2008-11-09 Thread Debian Project Secretary
We need a title for proposal 4, which allows the release team to override the social contract using case-by-case decisions. manoj -- Gauls! We have nothing to fear; except perhaps that the sky may fall on our heads tomorrow. But as we all know, tomorrow never comes!! -- Adventures of

Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

2006-10-26 Thread Debian Project Secretary
KPyjM4+ ANq5MEKPwYhPBBgRAgAPBQJFQSu9AhsMBQkAG6+AAAoJEEMP13Z94uS6/VgAoIkj sP6tSN+jXDq2rLxzkDXjz5D8AJ9jxwI8fE+nkQd19FxfbRR9Owwkeg== =6S3R -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- arch-tag: 1c14135a-7b23-45f7-b0d5-78e68b24d4f8 -- "I've seen it. It's rubbish." Marvin the Paranoid

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

2006-01-19 Thread Debian Project Secretary
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:41:19 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi, the text of the amendment says at its very end: > , >> Since this amendment would require modification of a foundation >> document, namely, the Social Contract, it requires a 3:1 majority >> to pass. > ` >