Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5 (i386 source)

2003-10-06 Thread Ean R. Schuessler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:18:30 -0500 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.1.1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-4 (i386 source)

2003-09-21 Thread Ean R. Schuessler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:45:00 -0500 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.1.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-2 (i386 source)

2003-09-16 Thread Ean R. Schuessler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 01:22:03 -0500 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.1.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)

2003-08-28 Thread Ean R. Schuessler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted kaffe 1:1.0.7-1 (i386 source)

2002-10-29 Thread Ean R. Schuessler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:05:58 -0600 Source: kaffe Binary: kaffe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.0.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: NMU's completely removed from kaffe in woody

2000-08-18 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
Well Ben, there are two reasons that I ignored the NMUs. The first reason is that Kaffe revisions have been so long in coming that the 1.0.6 source base bears little to no resembelence to the 1.0.5 source. Maintaining the patches that were done against 1.0.5 would be difficult at best and I was

Re: NMU's completely removed from kaffe in woody

2000-08-18 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
I refuse to continue this discussion on devel. Move it to -java where it belongs. On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: Good job Ean. You've done an excellent job of maintaining a quality package. --

Re: LSB?

1999-01-19 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
You can start by writing to our man on point with the LSB, Dale Scheetz. It is noteworthy, however, that Dale hasn't already commented in this thread. Are you still actively following the LSB, Dale? On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 10:51:03PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: It has come to my attention that

Re: problem w/ the Java interface lib for PostgreSQL

1998-10-07 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 08:03:04PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: I'm trying to rebuild libpgjava to depend on jdk1.1. Unfortunately, I'm getting segfaults when I run javac (from jdk1.1-dev), so I am currently unable to make a new version. Another strange thing. When I try to use libpgjava for

Free, but crappy, kaffe.

1998-10-06 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
A very marginal packaging of the yet to be announced Kaffe beta 2 is available on my web site at: http://www.novare.net/~ean/kaffe I have finally finished filling out my maintainer information and will try to get it expidited. Considering that we already know what my account on Master and my

[mazzocch@pop.systemy.it: [FYI] Cool Changes in JDK1.2b4]

1998-10-02 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
This comes from the Apache-Jserv list. Now, what I am wondering is if JServ continues to ignore free Java VMs and Sun continues its irresponsible development of the Java standard in the same secret way it has been, should JServ be considered non-free? In other words, did we decide that if a DFSG