Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1

2006-11-27 Thread Florian Ludwig
plement azc from scratch and not expand apt-proxy so we will not do it now. If you want a more decentralized caching facility use apt-zeroconf. Its under development and much things are missing that apt-proxy supports. But this will change hopefully soon. Thanks for the respond, i belief we get

Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1

2006-11-27 Thread Florian Ludwig
y grep'ing the log files. Not official reps are always a security risk... especially those that contain... * Packages without hashes * Pkgs without sign * PkgLists without sign For now we don't handle package lists (and/or pdiffs) with azc - they are always fetched from the fallback-server -

Re: Nice use of profanity...(Re: GNOME and trolls)

2007-02-20 Thread Florian Ludwig
debian-devel that you switched from gnome to xfce? greetings, Florian Ludwig signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

debian control field "depends"

2005-12-27 Thread Florian Ludwig
Hello,... a short question: has there to be a space between each dependes in the control field? i thought so and field in a bugreport [1] and didnt get an answer jet... florian ludwig [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344344 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: debian control field "depends"

2005-12-28 Thread Florian Ludwig
Lars Wirzenius wrote: ti, 2005-12-27 kello 20:56 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti: Hello,... a short question: has there to be a space between each dependes in the control field? i thought so and field in a bugreport [1] and didnt get an answer jet... florian ludwig [1] http

Re: debian control field "depends"

2005-12-28 Thread Florian Ludwig
Lars Wirzenius wrote: ke, 2005-12-28 kello 13:48 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt kirjoitti: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ke, 2005-12-28 kello 10:59 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti: There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i c

Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture

2006-03-12 Thread Florian Ludwig
Peter Kourzanov wrote: Dear DDs, Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386 rather that i386-hurd? Is there any rule that says that the OS name should come before CPU name? Is there any rule that says that the architecture should came before the OS name? Pjotr