Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp

2006-11-24 Thread Greg Norris
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:06:09PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > I've never came across a script on debian or elsewhere that required > this functionality enabled. Indeed I'm horrified to find this feature > enabled on RHEL boxes. FWIW, ksh93 (as packaged in Debian) has this functionality enabled.

Re: Making SELinux standard for etch

2006-10-07 Thread Greg Norris
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:35:32PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > As per policy, I am raising a balloon about ths issue; I think > if we ship vacation, finger, and sharutils, we can also ship > mandatory acess controls in the standard distribution :) This would make me very happy! :)

Bug#347469: O: installwatch -- orphaning the installwatch package

2006-01-10 Thread Greg Norris
Package: installwatch Version: 0.6.3-2 Severity: normal I haven't touched installwatch in quite some time, and no longer have any real interest in the beastie, so I've decided to orphan this package. At one point Matt Hope had expressed interest in taking it over (more recent versions are bundled

Re: per-user temp directories by default?

2005-11-07 Thread Greg Norris
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I don't think the suggestion was to make TMP=~/tmp, but TMP=/tmp/$USER, > where /tmp/$USER is owned by the user in question and is inaccessible to > others. Or perhaps I read too much into the proposal? That's pretty close... curren

Re: per-user temp directories by default?

2005-11-07 Thread Greg Norris
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:43PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > I have little operational experience with this PAM module, though. Does > it cause problems for certain apps? If so, could these problems be > solved with a less simplistic PAM configuration? The only one I've encountered so far i

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

2004-10-08 Thread Greg Norris
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:10:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.08.1601 +0200]: > > Unless you're offering to provide relevant samples of the messages > > in question, that response is quite worthless from > &g

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

2004-10-08 Thread Greg Norris
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | Can you give some steps to reproduce such memory comsuption. > > Yeah, receive the mail/spam I get and you'll see it within twenty > minutes. Unless you're offering to provide relevant samples of the messages in question, that r