for not doing that is?
-- Ian Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:45:16 -0700
Ian Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it seems that with the currently shipping versions of gzip (I tried
both stable/updates and testing), there is actually no way to
exactly replicate the compression produced by the standard package
build system
anything.
-- Ian Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
then fetching them with zsync (or rsync) would be considerably more
efficient than straight HTTP transfers. That's the reason why that
option was implemented. Perhaps it's thought that more testing is
required before it can be used for the archives; is there any other
reason not to use it?
-- Ian Bruce
the Packages.gz file
be compressed using the --rsyncable option, so that rsync can again
be used for updating the packages list?
-- Ian Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of access methods, to address the varying
situations of different client and mirror sites?
-- Ian Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 2004 07:10:28 -0700
From: Ian Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt-proxy v2 and rsync
I was distressed to read the following in the documentation for the new
apt-proxy:
- rsync is not officially supported.
It can work with rsync and some
7 matches
Mail list logo
