Re: Re: I hereby resign as secretary

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:47:50AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: project atmosphere. The only way we can get things back on track and re-focus our energy on the real reason we are all here... to create a free operating system... I believe that part of the problem is that we are not all here to

Re: Canonical and Debian

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:55:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: both because the overhead of training and coordinating with inexperienced (or, well, inept) coordinators is often higher than just doing all the work yourself, In the short term this is true, but if the amount of work is

Re: status of buildds?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:51:23PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: The s390 porting team can perfectly well do what the hurd-i386 porting team does: build them themselves. I mean, umm, you don't have to be hooked into w-b to upload packages. I believe the wanna-build admins don't want

2 new package status pages

Hi all, I have written 2 new package status web pages (one was mentioned on IRC and the other on debian-devel recently). The first: http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php gives you the status of all your packages (or an arbitrary list of packages) on all arches. Furthermore, if a

Packages-arch-specific update

Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the best place to e-mail to get the latest version of Packages-arch-specific in CVS (with some GHC changes) to be used? Thanks Ian, curious as to why debian-autobuild was killed

Re: FTBFS: architecture all packages

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: I also like the idea of rebuilding packages with newer versions of their build-depends (or tool-chain) when a buildd is idle. That too would require a more automatic handling of maybe-successfull builds that won't be

Accepted haskell-doc 19991028-3 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:15:26 + Source: haskell-doc Binary: haskell-doc Architecture: source all Version: 19991028-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: telnet98_98.02.16.orig.tar.gz is wrong

. Should I upload to fix the problem and change the maintainer to Debian QA at the same time? -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ Two most common elements in the universe: Hydrogen Stupidity.

Re: Release Plans (1999-05-10)

packages should get into the archive before the freeze libgtop1 and libghttp1. These are installed now. I assume the delay with libgtop1 was that it was a new package? If so, please remove libgtop0. Thanks -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ Just because you're

Re: gtop

. Yes :-( Any hints gratefully received... -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ Don't you just hate rhetorical questions?

Re: gtop and slink?

:-( -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name at a Swiss bank.

Re: Copyrights and licenses

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Ian Lynagh writes: So is it free or non-free? If the algorithm isn't patented you can do what ever you want with it, regardless of what the inventor says. OK, that just leaves two questions answered - is srp or SHA non-US and what do I put

Re: intent to package

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ivan Stojic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Telnet98 I've already taken that one. Sorry :-( -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ My poor mouse only has one ball.