Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:32:58AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I expect the initial packaging to be simple, it is just a './configure > && make install' package. Part of the 'make install' procedure should > be duplicated in the apt install scripts, for the KDC side, but that > part is not imp

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:30:41PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 10, "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In something like df I think the sensible thing to do is just to > > continue to list all bind mounts, even when it's redun

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:19:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > I'll file bugs against gtkdiskfree & pydf. Now that I understand > this more (thanks, MdI), I see that df has a way to exclude bind > mounts. > > $ df -T > FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/hda

Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks?

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:33:00PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining, > > I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time, > > but is it really bad to have