did mention that
assumption in my previous mail.
I thought you were referring to use of ~ on a signed integer, which is
implementation-defined.
Here's a way to compute OFFT_MAX (hopefully) without any undefined
behavior:
-((off_t)-2 * ((off_t)1 (sizeof (off_t) * CHAR_BIT - 2)) + 1)
--
Jakub
* John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de, 2014-04-07, 20:36:
No need to be rude about that, ok?
“Oho!” said the pot to the kettle;
“You are dirty and ugly and black!”
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 19:33:46 +0200
Source: y-u-no-validate
Binary: xul-ext-y-u-no-validate
Architecture: source all
Version: 2013052401-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub
* Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org, 2014-04-04, 23:22:
- Media player: mplayer (on libcaca, of course)
With its 4 RC bugs, it doesn't look like mplayer is going to be part of
jessie.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
* Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de, 2014-04-04, 12:58:
Try duckduckgoïng instead ☻ or searching POSIX, or something.
SUSv4 “helpfully” says:
If the first line of a file of shell commands starts with the characters
#!, the results are unspecified.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:57:36 +0200
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.28.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:33:52 +0200
Source: task
Binary: taskwarrior task
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
Argument from sexism?
Or a maternal insult.
Nah, probably neither.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140330180240.ga7...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 21:30:39 +0200
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.28
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
.
Then severity: grave is probably overkill. :-P
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140327135023.ga5...@jwilk.net
benefit from fixed #742780.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140327182650.ga4...@jwilk.net
use them.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140326222020.ga5...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:17:32 +0100
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.27.2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:28:29 +0100
Source: ocrad
Binary: ocrad libocrad-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
it be possible to identify which API is incompatible
and package just as much as needed only?
The goal is to provide missing source, which we would have to provide
for every bundled version that lacks it. Not sure what API has to do
with it…
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
is already happening.
If binary packages are allowed to have source in foreign source
packages, why wouldn't source packages be allowed to do the same?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
the needed sources, but my proposal wasn't met with
enthusiasm.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140312205750.ga7...@jwilk.net
-l /usr/bin/urxvt
-rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 1272864 Dec 22 18:50 /usr/bin/urxvt
It's setgid, so it can't be ptraced, so it doesn't show up in /proc.
The inability to see your own setgid processes makes this feature
unappealing. :(
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
to
deal with them is a bad idea.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140307180322.ga5...@jwilk.net
well-known
way to exploit insecure use of /tmp, it is not the only way, and often
even not the most exciting way. The symlink protection does not exempt
you from having to care about using temporary files securely!
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
and as I read them this would affect uid 0 as
well.
Luckily this is not the case. :) root can see other users' /proc entries
just fine. Perhaps the documentation should be improved.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
in the test Depends:.
I advise to never use @builddeps@. It's a great way to shoot yourself in
the foot. :\
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:44:14 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
* Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com, 2014-02-28, 10:35:
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_002
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
as the prefered arch, which is advised (but
not required) to be amd64. If multiple values are provided, the first
value (only) will be used to build the arch:all package.
Any arguments on this rough concept?
What about architecture wildcards? Could I say
Build-Architecture-Indep: linux-any
?
--
Jakub
-essential
package (such as dpkg-dev), not with THE build-essential package.
dpkg-buildpackage currently requires the build-essential package to be
installed, but that's an implementation detail that shouldn't be relied
upon.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
# of each build, or 0 to disable.
$apt_distupgrade = 0;
Admittedly, I've never tried enabling this option, and maybe buildd's
sbuild is different…
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
the same arch:all package to be built by multiple buildds…
[0] Likely s/Most/All/ if you take into account hypothetical
architectures that nobody has boostrapped (yet?!), e.g. musl-linux-m68k.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
these days, and those merely good are somehow frowned upon.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140224210111.ga9...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:58:28 +0100
Source: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Binary: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 22:18:35 +0100
Source: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Binary: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140221173351.ga4...@jwilk.net
service? :)
That's why I was careful to publish the address nowhere.
It's published here:
http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/wanna-build-states
archive.org tells me it's been there since at least 2004.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
in devscripts.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140214131038.ga20...@jwilk.net
/wiki/poor_man%27s
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140213180034.ga3...@jwilk.net
* Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net, 2014-02-13, 18:36:
How many uploaded binaries might include malware?
*shrug* It's not like it's difficult to hide malicious code in source
packages.
How many configure scripts that we never rebuild from source contains
trojans?
--
Jakub Wilk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:33:28 +0100
Source: task
Binary: taskwarrior task
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
. :-)
+- conflicting-negation-in-source-relation
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/conflicting-negation-in-source-relation.html
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2014-02-09, 12:21:
gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe (8 packages, 17 tags, plus 3 overrides)
It is non-fatal, so can be overriden if needed.
Link for the lazy:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe.html
The fact that Lintian
-uses-obsolete-national-encoding.html
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-copyright-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding.html
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2014-02-07, 17:52:
Choose a name which is less likely to conflict, e.g. exim uses Debian-exim.
I think consensus was converging on prefixing an underscore for system
users (_foo) last time we discussed this.
Well, #248809 is still open…
--
Jakub Wilk
. And I even doubt there's consensus it is desired.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140204133857.ga30...@jwilk.net
archives”?
The rest looks good.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140202214407.gc13...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:15:42 +0100
Source: rc
Binary: rc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Description:
rc
* Christoph Ender christoph.en...@spellbreaker.org, 2014-02-01, 21:47:
I’m currently having trouble reproducing a build error – see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735757
My guess is that the root cause is #735782.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
, especially when .tar.xz was the
smallest file…
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140125224317.ga9...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 23:19:34 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 23:50:33 +0100
Source: delta
Binary: delta
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2006.08.03-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
* Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org, 2014-01-19, 12:26:
Since the Debian packages vehiculate programs to be installed on a
computer,
What does “vehiculate” mean in this context?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:19:34 +0100
Source: task
Binary: taskwarrior task
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:15:40 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
that they don't do that?
?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140114113150.ga11...@jwilk.net
in 2007. Upstream
certainly doesn't subscribe to the “release eary, release early”
philosophy, but the report of their death might be an exaggeration.
But then, xpdf in Debian is so heavily patched, that it doesn't have
much to do with the upstream version anyway...
--
Jakub Wilk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:25:40 +0100
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.27.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:51:27 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
of our evil plan: starting next
week, we intend to automatically remove large home directories that are
above a dynamic deletion threshold (again, based on age and size).
Ooo, cool! :-)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:31:08 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
it to
do.
For a lightweight, PAM-less uid switcher in Debian's base system, you
probably want to use start-stop-daemon --chuid.
AFAICS neither setuidgid nor start-stop-daemon protects you from tty
hijacking via TIOCSTI (see bug #628843).
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:41:45 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:23:45 +0100
Source: task
Binary: taskwarrior task
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.0~beta2-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:35:07 +0100
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.27
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:47:36 +0100
Source: ocrad
Binary: ocrad libocrad-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.23~pre2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 22:35:48 +0100
Source: task
Binary: taskwarrior task
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.0~beta2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 19:56:06 +0100
Source: task
Binary: taskwarrior task
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.0-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 17:22:43 +0100
Source: openinbrowser
Binary: xul-ext-openinbrowser
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
* Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org, 2014-01-03, 13:13:
Given that you (at least) seemed to show opposition to the field
(AFAIR), and that you've done an independent implementation of the
runner; does 692704 mean that you changed mind?
No, it just means that I gave up.
--
Jakub Wilk
.
linux-all would be the perfect solution to your problem if it existed.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140102185724.ga22...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:56:20 +0100
Source: openinbrowser
Binary: xul-ext-openinbrowser
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-buildpackage for signing, but debsign. (It would be nice if
someone from the wb-team could confirm that this is the case.)
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dpkgarch=i386ver=1.17.5stamp=1386841160
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:48:30 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:52:08 +0100
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.26
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-generic.html
[2] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-google-adsense.html
The tag descriptions could use a review by debian-l10n-english@ldo…
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:25:29 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:56:03 +0100
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.25.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:16:11 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:36:51 +0100
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.25
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:04:22 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
4) DEBIAN_PRIORITY=low apt-get install --reinstall $package
If any questions are asked in point 4 that weren't asked in point 2, something
is fishy.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
anyway, so what does reducing
a 10-day delay buy you?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131130164034.gb2...@jwilk.net
. §5.6.7 says that Urgency “is a description of how important it is to
upgrade to this version from previous ones”. How can possibly RT decide that
from now on it's more important to upgrade most packages?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:27:21 +0100
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
install $package
2) rm -rf /var/cache/debconf
3) DEBIAN_PRIORITY=low apt-get install --reinstall $package
If any questions are asked in point 3, the package uses debconf as registry.
Funnily enough, debconf itself fails this test.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
* Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org, 2013-11-23, 11:28:
I wonder if it would make sense to register a proper media type for Debian
binary packages to the IANA.
Yes, that's a great idea.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Description:
libuniconf4.6 - C++ network libraries for rapid application development
libwvstreams-dev - Development libraries and header files for libwvstreams4.6
libwvstreams4.6
it.
IANA ftp-master, but here's my quick review:
Please rename /sbin/rc to something else. We've had (unrelated) /usr/bin/rc
in Debian for at least 18 years.
What is the rationale for the binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath override?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
#724974
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131028121738.ga1...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:52:40 +0200
Source: libguess
Binary: libguess-dev libguess1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Shadura andre...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
$IFS
The hard part is convincing AV vendors that they should support another test
file. .oO( It might be easier to develop an actual DFSG-free virus, so that AV
software will _have_ to detect it... )
[0] Seriously? http://i.imgur.com/D6PfW.jpg
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:14:28 +0200
Source: ocrad
Binary: ocrad libocrad-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 09:21:30 +0200
Source: pdnsd
Binary: pdnsd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.9a-par-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
into
their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css file:
img[src^=http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/libravatar.cgi?;]
{
display: none !important;
}
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:31:52 +0200
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24.4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:48:46 +0200
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24.3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-obsolete-national-encoding.html
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/doc-base-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding.html
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
a hidden assumption here that adt is the only thing that will ever run
the tests.
I, for one, am a happy nonuser of the autopkgtest package. I either run the
tests manually or via sadt (see #712095).
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
to be deleted.
...because they're indeed not special-cased.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130916131831.gb9...@jwilk.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:27:06 +0200
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Description
a binary file, otherwise False.
How is is_binary_alt() different than is_binary()? They have identical
docstrings.
chunk = get_starting_chunk(filename)
if not PY3:
return is_binary_string(chunk)
There's no else branch...
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 16:49:25 +0200
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24.2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:31:18 +0200
Source: lintian4python
Binary: lintian4python
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk jw
301 - 400 of 1116 matches
Mail list logo