Hi Michael,
I am trying to fix #513272, a FTBFS on armel. The problem basically
boils down to the following snippet failing to compile on armel (tested
with a Debian lenny on a qemu-emulated armel system):
see /usr/include/bits/mathdef.h on armel:
] [...]
] #ifndef __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH
] /*
Hi,
ircii - needs maintainer
taken.
Regards,
Jan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Klaus,
from the bash manpage:
/dev/tcp/host/port
/dev/udp/host/port
This has been discussed several times [1][2], and the outcome was every time
that this should not be a feature of the shell, but of more specialized
tools like nc. Use those or recompile your
Hi,
Bug#392665: O: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi
I'll take nvi if no one objects.
Regards,
Jan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Qingning,
Yes, mrxvt is quite nice with its tab support, and other features. And,
mrxvt is being actively developed by the upstream authors.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to spend much time on mrxvt
lately (being busy with the real life). Indeed, I would like to give
mrxvt away to
Hi,
* rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
developer
Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My workload is quite low
at the moment, but will rapidly increase in about four
Hi Josip,
If you two don't manage to get to it, I'm a backup. :) We need an O wnpp bug
report to record this...
may I take that as an offer to sponsor us? :) I've created an ITA bug
against wnpp now. (Don't know the number yet, the BTS bot is slow, and
I'm in a hurry...)
Regards,
Jan
Hi,
I've noticed that some packages conflict or depend on themself. As far
as I know, this makes no sense and the dependency (of conflict) should
be removed, but I prefer to ask here before filing useless bug reports.
This is a list of the packages:
[...]
unison:
Conflicts on unison
Hi DDs,
[[ Marc Haber ]]
Experience with adduser shows that no-one besides the maintainers
themselves and their closest environment uses experimental packages.
[[ Simon Huggins ]]
See this worries me a bit.
I'd love for Debian users to test some more cutting edge versions of
packages
the maintainer some work
and tag the bug fixed-in-experimental myself (together with
a short explanatory message to the bug log), but am unsure
whether I'm allowed to.
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan C. Nordholz
jckn At gmx net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hijacking
someone's package.
As for my contribution: I'd be happy to do more, and I'm monitoring
wnpp for packages I feel knowledgeable enough about to offer my
help and/or ask for sponsoring, but the right one just hasn't come
across yet. ;-)
Thanks again,
Jan
--
Jan C. Nordholz
jckn At gmx
-header giving the version in question).
Ah, thank you for the pointer - my memories of the changes made to the
BTS[1] were not as vivid as I had hoped them to be.
Regards,
Jan
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00010.html
--
Jan C. Nordholz
jckn At gmx net
12 matches
Mail list logo