Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:36:24AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > You behaviour wrt bugs is more than lacking. You report something, > > without making a report that has enough relevant info to deal with it > > (read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> again

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:03:57PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The display manager > > starts the X server, not the other way around, which means that the X server > > has no control over the display manager's behavior; and the authentication >

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Jason Henry Parker
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Check it out for yourself: > > orion:Stuff$ ls -ald desktop.* > -rwxrwxr-x1 root windows 125 Nov 20 1998 desktop.ini > orion:Stuff$ mv desktop.ini desktop.what! > orion:Stuff$ ls -ald desktop.* > -rwxrwxr-x1 root windows

ITP: libcrypt-ssleay-perl

2000-12-27 Thread Jason Henry Parker
[This message has been submitted as a wishlist bug against wnpp; the bug number is 80584.] Crypt::SSLeay allows LWP::UserAgent objects (among others) to correctly perform GET and POST operations over HTTPS. Since it uses SSL, the package will depend on libssl095a (and build-depend on the appropri

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: > > I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either > > the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and > > you're fine. It's quite simple, really

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is misleading. What ORBS does is *test* mail servers to ensure that > it *is* an open relay, before adding the relay's address to the list. > > They do NOT (according to the web page) "scan the net" for open relays. > Rather, the list is generat

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Four weeks? Did they change this? When we got blacklisted coz a customer > (open relay) used us as a smart host, they gave us four days ;-). All I can report is my experience. I got four weeks. > Yeah, me too. They're competent, cool people, and their sy

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And taking people off the list is automatic. Fix it, enter the IP in their > form, it gets re-cehcekd and taken off the list. Works like a charm. My recent experience with ORBS backs this up. > If people configured their servers correctly, they'd never ge