Hi, all
Dominique Dumont wrote:
In this package, lcdproc's maintainer is still Jose and Jonathan is listed as
uploaders.
Is this still valid ?
Jose, so you want to resume maintaining lcdproc or do you want another one to
take over ?
As you prefer. I haven't uploaded any new
Lobo Oscuro wrote:
[...] pero no me conviene, soy un super iman para los problemas,
^
y no tengo paciencia para renegar. Esos son solo algunos, pero siempre
hay algo que me choca, mas un sistema casi vacio como esto.
Jaime Robles wrote:
Buenas,
Hace unos meses un desarrollador de debian-ham dejó Debian y con ello
muchos de los paquetes para radioaficionados se quedaron huerfanos.
Eso hace que algunos tengamos que coger un poco más de trabajo.
Afortunadamente hay algunas personas que de momento no son
Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:02:12AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Normalmente, añadir una línea * Upload sponsored by Jaime Robles
ja...@robles.es en el changelog es el primer paso.
Esto es una tonteria que hace alguna gente y no da absolutamente ninguna
Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:30:36AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
- For Squeeze: a package ntpdate which depends on rdate and
provides a wrapper script, used to emulate ntpdate's main functionality
(set the system's clock) in terms of rdate and mark
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Peter Eisentraut (pet...@debian.org):
Nevertheless, since ntpdate used to be quite popular, I figured I'd better
ask
here for objections.
Would there be a possibility to prove some kind of wrapper for those
among our users who might have various local
Hi
I was reading through my archived mail and stumbled upon this thread
from over a year ago.
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:48:01PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:40:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yep, waiting for an unrelated process
Harald Braumann wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0800
Paul Menage men...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney sean...@seanius.net
wrote:
or /proc/bus/usb or /dev/shm or /dev/pts... :)
/dev is a bit different though - even if it's mounted as a
Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to seek advice before I perform a mass-bug filing for this
unstable (though semi-common) use of sprintf and snprintf:
sprintf(buf, %s foo %d %d, buf, var1, var2);
This is used in many upstreams to perform a format-string-handling
version of strcat.
This
Nico Golde wrote:
Yes.
I see two possibilities here, one option is to get
8:2007b~dfsg-1 unblocked and let this migrate to lenny
(there is some weird SONAME change though) or to reupload a
+lenny2 version to testing-security again.
Yuck!
Opinions?
7:2007b~dfsg-4+lenny2 sounds
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Many thanks to José Luis Tallón for proposing to bake cookies, but there
are already enough cookers in Spain.
Thank you for organizing this all along, and thanks to *all*
contributors, whether they fixed their bugs or not, for helping make a
better free OS for everyone
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On ven, 2008-09-12 at 11:32 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
This is a major bug IMHO. It means that at least for i386
dkms-generated
debs cannot be put in repositories. Thus you require a build
environment
on the target host.
No. You only need dkms.
David Paleino wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:12:59 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Furthermore, m-a is part of the package management system, which is a
good thing.
Indeed, as reasoned below
[...]
Building packages should be the norm. Having many files under /lib that
cannot be tracked by
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:37:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First solution: change the scripts to use a bash function instead of cat
EOF, like yesno() create a function display() without
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mumble
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : Mikkel Krautz [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others
* URL :
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
After a full release cycle, it is high time we did.
Having nobody actually using 'progsreiserfs' ---the installations
reported by popcon are certainly due to mistaken installations looking
for 'reiserfsprogs'---, and given that upstream
gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:27:26 -0200, Fernando M.M. wrote:
Althought i have already seen some old discussion about packing the
webmail Roundcube (1) i have not found the package using the
package search (2).
[..]
Is someone working on it?
Seems so:
Shawn Starr wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote:
[snip]
Heliodor I won't be including, gtk-window-decorator from compiz is the same
thing and will work with beryl (im not sure of metacity themes as there are
issues with this)
What about requesting a
que copias
dentro del directorio debian en tu target clean
Pero... por qué no lo copias directamente *en su lugar definitivo* en
lugar de usar dh_install ?
Ten en cuenta que dh_install es más completo y potente que dh_movefiles
[que está depreciado/obsoleto, por cierto...]
Un saludo,
José Luis
Raphaël Pinson wrote:
Hi devs,
Some time ago, libapache-mod-auth-mysql was removed from Debian
testing because it didn't work. However, this package is largely used
and really needs to be present in Debian.
After spending some time trying to find a patch, I finally packaged
the new
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Raphaël Pinson]
Some time ago, libapache-mod-auth-mysql was removed from Debian testing
because it didn't work. However, this package is largely used and really
needs to be present in Debian.
After spending some time trying to find a patch, I finally packaged the
Raphaël Pinson wrote:
Le Dimanche 21 Janvier 2007 21:14, José Luis Tallón a écrit :
Raphaël Pinson wrote:
Hi devs,
Some time ago, libapache-mod-auth-mysql was removed from Debian
testing because it didn't work. However, this package is largely used
and really needs to be present
Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
Hi all,
As Javier noted just after releasing Sarge [1], we need better
documentation integration tools in Debian. Yes, we have dhelp [2], but it
lacks loads of features, and it's not what I would call in shape [3]. I have
tried to fix this situation,
Hi all,
In agreement with the current maintainer, Jonathan Oxer, I will take
over maintainership of lcdproc. As per his wishes, he will continue to
be co-maintainer (uploader) for the time being.
This is mostly to let ftpmasters know that he has indeed agreed to
these terms so that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola
Una duda:
No sé si siga en pie la costumbre de renombrar el .tar.gz original a -dfsg
.tar.gz cuando uno le quita ciertos archivos que no se pueden distribuir con
debian.
¿Es así, o simplemente quito los archivos y le dejo el nombre tal como está?
Desde
corporativismo de los DDs
vocales en la lista no deja de sorprenderme.
Ya veremos en qué afecta esto a mi disposición a colaborar en Debian.
Gracias por opinar, no obstante, Alejandro.
José Luis Tallón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Rudy Godoy wrote:
El d�a 10/05/2006 a 14:20 José Luis Tallón escribi�...
[snip]
Dejame decirte algo, no lo tomes a mal, parte de la responsabilidad de
ser encargado de un paquete es dar a conocer cuando no vamos a poder
encargarnos adecuadamente de estos. Hay que avisar cuando uno no va
John Goerzen wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:13:31AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Jose,
Before I comment on a few things, I want to make something clear to you.
You have repeatedly accused me of having something personal against you,
both in public and in private.
It definitively
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 03:13 +0200, José Luis Tallón a écrit :
Please tell me how in hell can you justify accusing me of not testing my
packages, when you have obviously not done so.
You seem to have some fixation with uploading, don't you?? Six versions
in 24h
David Nusinow wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
He has packaged the last version of bacula, and it is not uploaded
because it's not ready, then a new version was showed up... he has a
personal apt repository that users from bacula mailing list uses,
Steve Langasek wrote:
It is the responsibility of a package maintainer to ensure that fixes for
bugs are uploaded in a timely manner. If José Luis isn't able to do this,
because he doesn't have a sponsor or for any other reason, then he is not an
effective maintainer for the package.
That
Stephen Frost wrote:
If the maintainer still wants to maintain it, help him, do NMUs, whatever,
but I'm still looking for one reason you can take over the package against
the maintainer's opinion.
He wants to have his name on the package w/o doing the work
(apparently).
What if I
John Goerzen wrote:
Hello,
I intend to take over the Bacula package. I would first like to say
thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
maintaining it for these years.
You have a funny sense of time, don't you?
This is true; Years. Since October 2003.
A brief
Gustavo Franco wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for this. I'm using backuppc at work and was considering to
move our backups to bacula after upgrading our current hardware setup.
Package updates and bug squashing in general was on the roadmap.
:-)
Bacula (specially 1.38.x is much better... hopefully
on Debian-Devel.
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:42:17PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
I'd rather have you as a co-maintainer.
The unfortunate situation is that i have been in the NM queue for more
than two years and a half now. The fact that i depend on my sponsors to
get packages uploaded makes
John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 10, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
or some
Hola a todos!!
Como algunos de vosotros ya sabéis, el año 2005 no ha sido nada
bueno para mí. Esto me ha hecho descuidar mi trabajo en Debian. No
pretendo que sirva como disculpa, pero como comprenderéis el llevar más
de 2 años y medio en NM sin que mi AM me haga demasiado caso no
contribuye
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi José,
how about sending this to Frontdesk [EMAIL PROTECTED] or MIA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of spamming debian-devel with that?
Thank you for the suggestion. Will do that in the future.
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Stephen.
Having sent you e-mails with my last answers to the TasksSkills
stage of the NM process on 2005/10/05, and having received receipt
confirmation from you on 2005/10/18, i still have no answer from you.
Moreover, i have ping'd you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am rebuilding my KDE packages for upload, so as to fulfil the
requirements of the C++ ABI transition in Sid, and i am encountering a
serious(IMVHO) problem: binaries get linked to *both* libstdc++5 (old
version) and libstdc++6 (new version,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* José Luis Tallón [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:58:47 +0200]:
Hi,
(Was the direct mail necessary?)
Any advice on how to proceed with this?? I have already succesfully
uploaded *one* package, but Linda complained loudly on the rest...
some library not already transitioned
Lior Kaplan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: debian-hebrew
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Yaacov Zamir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://debian-hebrew.alioth.debian.org
* License : GPL
Description
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
Hi Sven...
Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
other account and it will work.
Thanks, Rober... i'll have to remove that i think.
Jose Luis is in the new
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
Ok, but now that sarge is released, what are the plans for etch ? The question
is if i keep parted without reiserfs support, or if i add it again ?
If there really is interest in support for ReiserFS in
.
Kind regards,
José Luis Tallón
[1] http://packages.debian.org/bacula
[2] http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl? \
searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=bacula
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
that they are stable
packages. In fact, they are even categorized under extra instead of
optional, because they are lower priority.
Who is jltallon? adv-solutions.net has no information on its web page
explaining about who they are.
Well, José Luis Tallón (that's me). Currently finishing the NM process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juan Cespedes wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:08:22PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
| wrote:
|
| Por lo que veo en http://nm.debian.org, el DAM te ha puesto en
| estado de espera para la creación de la cuenta debido a que tu
| clave GPG está solo
First of all, this package would be a God-send for me (see below)
Note that 'wwwconfig-common' already contains most of the needed
infrastructure... but it is too php-oriented. Splitting it in purely
Apache/PHP-oriented scripts (which would remain as wwwconfig-common) and
a new
Raphaël 'SurcouF' Bordet wrote:
Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: smarty
Version : 2.6.5
Upstream Author : Monte Ohrt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrei Zmievski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://smarty.php.net/
* License : LGPL
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
hi there,
i don't believe i raised an ITP [if i did it was a mistake] but
instead should have raised one of those notifications that the
basket _should_ be packaged. [can't remember what it's called].
RFP. You can submit one of those with 'reportbug'.
Don't
of maintaining it as an official package.
Best,
~J.L.
- Original Message
Subject: About Basket packaging status
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 01:40:02 +0200
From: José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Luke!
~ How is the BasKet packaging status?? I thought
desarrollador de debian, pero el subirlo al archivo lo hace un
desarrollador, que actúa como sponsor. En esta FAQ tienes todo lo necesario:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
Además, no veas lo que te hace aprender ( a mí que me lo digan!! )
Bienvenido abordo.
José Luis
At 10:39 25/03/2004, you wrote:
El Jueves, 25 de Marzo de 2004 02:47, José Luis Tallón escribió:
Debian-Lex ( se creó en ¿Octubre? recuerdo el post ... )
Javier de la Cueva tiene montada su Notaría a golpe de software
libre a ver si convencemos a los demás :)
Hey, hey, hey...
Que soy un
At 12:28 24/03/2004, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 11:18:44PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
Quiero consultaros cuál es la mejor forma de confeccionar una lista de
desarrolladores de habla hispana, además de una de residentes en España.
Pues esta lista, como ya se ha dicho, pero, para tener en cuenta
su ayuda
No hay de qué darlas. Siento no poder ser de más ayuda.
Saludos
José Luis Tallón
desaparecido, pero no me parece lo más adecuado.
Es poco ortodoxo, desde luego, pero de momento... habrá que encontrar una
solución al problema, por si acaso.
Un saludo,
José Luis Tallón
At 15:00 15/03/2004, you wrote:
Buenas noticias desde la Comunidad de Madrid: Apuestan por el Software
Libre en la consejería de educación :)
http://www.educa.madrid.org/web/madrid_linux/archivos/caracteristicas.html
A ver si empiezan a ir por buen camino
- Las aplicaciones de gestión están
bacula-sd
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.32f-4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
bacula - Network backup, recovery and verification
bacula-client - Network backup, recovery
At 20:58 28/02/2004, you wrote:
Nacho Garcia wrote:
Don't worry, I DO live in Spain and I had never seen anything like
that before. Ick! ;)
May that be ali-oli or something like that? I am also puzzled by this
description :-)
I assume it must be AjoBlanco... a garlic-based version of gazpacho
At 15:44 08/02/2004, you wrote:
[snip]
Hmm tras leer el thread
(http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-January/001893.html) la
idea que se me queda es que solo los drivers desarrollados por XFree86
cambiarán su licencia, cualquier otro driver contribuido por empresas
(como el de ATI) o
Podría venir de serie con la distribución ... es la perfecta respuesta para
los *BSDeros
http://www.kde-look.org/content/files/10584-dressel.jpg
... y seguro que ganamos usuarios ;-)
Jose
http://slashdot.org/articles/04/01/14/1319228.shtml?tid=106tid=117tid=185tid=90tid=99
Sin comentarios . :)
Enhorabuena, Guillem... Ya era hora de que saliera en /. tu respuesta a los
upgrades que dicen hacer los BSDeros de Linux a FreeBSD
Como diría Amaya: All resistance is futile...
At 11:01 22/07/2003 +0200, you wrote:
[snip]
Algunos de los jovenes nacionales tuvieron que irse antes porque nesecitaban
pillar un vion.
Por cierto, tenemos que hacer publica la cancion del seat debianero junto con
el mp3 original para que os echeis unas risas.
porfa ! X-
data
--
Jesus
At 17:05 01/07/2003 +, you wrote:
Hola
Hablé con Sanguino hace poco de las camisetas que sobraron/devolvieron
de los últimos envios (145). La idea que le plantee es venderlas a
traves de la tienda virtual de Hispalinux.net
http://www.hispalinux.net/tienda/merchandising_prods.html
Por aquí hay
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
OK, it's the inquirer
It it was proved to be true, shouldn't we *all* Linux users ( as well as
Stallman plus the FSF as a whole ) sue SCO for copyright infringement ???
That could be *quite funny* g g
Regards,
J.L.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
OK, it's the inquirer
It it was proved to be true, shouldn't we *all* Linux users ( as well as
Stallman plus the FSF as a whole ) sue SCO for copyright infringement ???
That could be *quite funny* g g
Regards,
J.L.
At 11:36 28/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
We should still discuss an i686 (or i586) optimized port, but fixing
the problem will make it possible to seperate the issues.
Indeed! This is (suppossed to be)? just a first step, in order to solve the
ABI compatibility issue with libstdc++5
An i586/i686
At 12:52 27/04/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 03:56, Chris Cheney wrote:
I also find it hard to believe that the majority of our users do not
have or can not purchase a system that is less than 7 years old.
I have a brand new 486-class system with 32MB of RAM. It's less than 6
At 19:55 26/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
1a. create a stripped down version for i386, i.e. required/important
and go for i486.
Is there much performance improvement in dropping i386 in favour of
i486+?
- Integrated math
At 14:17 26/04/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I demand that José Luis Tallón may or may not have written...
At 19:55 26/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
1a. create a stripped down version for i386, i.e. required/important
and go for i486
At 18:02 23/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta dijo:
Pues vaya una mierda de flamewar que vamos a montar si todos estamos
de acuerdo. Postfix rulez.
Tú lo has querido. Postfix mola, pero mucho más con un messagewall
delante.
esto... enmedio, porfa ;)
At 01:18 22/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:18, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Why don't we consider the x86-64 as beeing a 64-bits-only architecture
Because we want to run Netscape, commercial games, Frauhofer MP3 en/decoders,
Oracle, and other binary-only i386 software.
If AMD had
( forgot to Reply to the list, sorry )
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:58:20 +0200
To: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Debian for x86-64 (AMD Opteron)
At 20:23 21/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Le lun 21/04/2003 à 19:52, José Luis Tallón a écrit
At 19:10 12/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Saturday 12 April 2003 16:58, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Every architecture knows where its libraries are installed. One way
would be to make 'dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_LIBTYPE' return either
'lib' or
75 matches
Mail list logo
