Can we please keep accessibility for the disabled in mind too?
Unless Debian wants to be completely ableist, Gnome and KDE are the only
two viable options.
I worked in adaptive technology for years training blind users to use
JAWS under windows. I think it's great that similar technology now
What we do to combat that is All patches going into FFmpeg are
> reviewed with security in mind
>
> The codebase was repeatledly tested with fuzzed files to uncover all
> kinds of anomalies, all such found anomalies where fixed. Also
> independant of googles fuzzing efforts, some of our users ha
> > Well, my reasoning was, that we just try to wild guess about
> > user capabilities. I have just learned that user behave very
> > unexpected and exactly these users happen to be quite vocal
> > how broken Debian is. I just would like to give them lesser
> > chances to be correct when they cla
> Hi
>
> Could you get audacious + audacious-plugins-extra from unstable and tell
> us which formats are supported by xmms but not by audacious ?
>
Is there is a wiki page for this?
Just at a glance, here is what I see. I've pasted the package descriptions for
what I suspect are the most obs
> Most of this packages are xmms plugins. Maintainers will need to port
> them to xmms2 or bmpx, or they should be removed.
>
> Other packages just depend on xmms as a mere multimedia player, and
> therefore we recommend the maintainers to adjust their dependencies to
> bmpx, xmms2 or audacious.
>
>It would be interesting to change name Debian Multimedia to prevent
> confusion with Debian-Multimedia site[1]?
Piping in as a user, I can say this has caused me a bit of confusion on more
than one occasion. Given that there are versions of the same packages which
are alternately hosted by
6 matches
Mail list logo
