On 2/24/09, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:20:31AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >
> > Interesting. And yes, illustrative of the historically (and, should I
> > add, ridiculous? No, I'd better not ;-) ) rivality between Linux and
> > the *BSDs, big egos included.
>
>
> Well, th
On 2/28/06, Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 2/20/06, Andrew Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:19 +0100, Josh Hurst wrote:
>>> Does the Debian ksh93 package include libast and libshell?
>>
>
On 2/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/05, Andrew Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:44 +0100, Andrew Porter wrote:
> > AT&T have released the source to ksh93 under the CPL (Common Public
> > Licence)
> >
>
On 2/20/06, Andrew Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:19 +0100, Josh Hurst wrote:
>
>
> Does the Debian ksh93 package include libast and libshell?
>
>
> No -
>
> dpkg -L ksh
> /.
> /bin
> /bin/ksh93
> /usr
> /usr/bi
On 7/13/05, Andrew Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:44 +0100, Andrew Porter wrote:
> > AT&T have released the source to ksh93 under the CPL (Common Public
> > Licence)
> >
> > Are there any plans to create a debian package ?
>
> Bah - just found a package in unstable for
5 matches
Mail list logo