Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
Description:
aspell-fi - The Finnish dictionary for aspell
ifinnish - A medium-size Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-large - A large Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-small - A small Finnish dictionary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:00:00 +0200
Source: jakarta-ecs
Binary: libjakarta-ecs-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle
Tobi listacco...@e-tobi.net writes:
/usr/share/vdr-dev/dependencies.sh. But the shebang simply is nothing to
worry about.
May I ask what's the reason you're using this kind of a convoluted
system? Wouldn't it be simpler to separate debian/make-special-vdr.sh
and debian/rules, and call
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca writes:
Is the NEW queue going to get processed any time soon? There are 215
packages waiting [1] about half of which have been there 3 or more
weeks.
NEW is being processed almost daily.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology
Deng Xiyue manphiz-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org writes:
IMHO, except package with just SONAME bump, packages in NEW queue are
better processed in a FIFO manner. Just my two cents.
Most of the time this is the case. But, if you upload a large, complex
package, that might get passed by for a
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes:
I enquired previously about whether we might have some developers
assist the ftpmasters by pre-assessing packages and reporting
appropriately, which might ease the process. I don't know if this would
actually help them or just duplicate work,
Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org writes:
I have several very small ocaml packages waiting in NEW for several
weeks now. I am upstream on these packages, and, honnestly, it takes
few minutes to check them (only 3 files of code in tarball).
There are currently 46 packages in NEW which have
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
started experimenting with the new copyright file format, I never
documented the license or copyright information for any of the
Autotools-generated files, and I never heard a peep of concern about
that.)
Currently the ftpmasters don't require those
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Indeed, the concept of derived work does not exist in European law.
Wrong. It does exist at least in Finland, most likely elsewhere in the
Nordic countries, too.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
*
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Change your license, and maybe we???ll be able to think of collaborating.
You seem to be unable for collaboration as you try to blackmail me.
Stating a fact is not blackmail. As SFLC has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:35:01 +0300
Source: jabsorb
Binary: libjabsorb-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa kil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:35:01 +0300
Source: jakarta-ecs
Binary: libjakarta-ecs-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa kil
Agustin Martin agmar...@debian.org writes:
There was the opinion that there should be a wordlist of standard priority,
and that the best for that was wamerican, formerly wenglish. So wamerican
may be left with standard priority.
Why does standard need an English wordlist?
--
* Sufficiently
José Luis González jlgon...@ya.com writes:
System. This makes it impossible to report a bug with RC severity in
the Bug Tracking System that permits RC bugs to remain in Debian when
the report is closed incorrectly and nobody notices before it is
archived (please see bug #227941.) Since the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes:
As to the people who emailed me that they are putting together a
petition for the DAM to have me removed from the project,
WHAT?? Could these people step up please and tell us WHY you consider
expelling Manoj from Debian would be a good
Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org writes:
Please refrain from using the absolutely wrong list for your own
political purposes in the future.
As Cyril already pointed out, Robert's post was to the devel, not to
the devel-announce, so please ignore my outburst. Sorry for the noise
Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com writes:
I don't think d-d-a is meant to be used as a forum, but since others are
doing so, I guess it's fine if I join.
Mmm, who is doing so? Do you mean the release team update? If so, I
don't think the update qualifies as using devel-announce as a forum.
And
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho antti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi writes:
Doesn't it occur to you that there might be a reason why the Secretary cannot
be removed by GR or by the Leader's whim?
Actually, the Secretary *can* be removed by a GR. The GR must of
course amend the Constitution at the same time to
Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So it might well be that those SMTP servers, that accept mail regardless
of the existence of the recipient mailbox, take load off your server's
spam processing, because they eat spammer's resources.
I rather use a MTA that implements SMTP time delays to
Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wrong! The overrriden ones should be a lot of fun to look at.
Well, the override file is there for a purpose - it's entirely
possible that lintian gives a false positive or the package in
question has a valid exception for the error. In any case the lintian
Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've yet to be pointed to a grave or serious bug in the packages pending
in NEW, otherwise I see no reason why they shouldn't be processed and
pass NEW. I completely agree with this well written post
Does the package in NEW fix the well known backscatter
Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the NEW queue going to get processed any time soon? There's a load
of packages that are 3 weeks or more old.
The NEW queue is constantly being processed. Unfortunately it seems
that in the normal case more packages enter NEW than are processed, so
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think that we should drop the legal review (that would probably
be dangerous). However, NEW reviews seem to cover a lot of other
aspects currently, which might explain why it takes so much time.
These things are the major slowdowns, at least for
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 03/12/08 at 15:41 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
if you've also made sure that you don't get any lintian warnings and
your debian-directory is clear (especially debian/rules), the whole
process is pretty painless.
Why is that relevant?
Lintian errors
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm guessing that many of the other checks that Lucas mentions fall out
of the examination you have to do for the licensing anyway?
Yes, eg. code duplication shows up pretty fast in the
license/copyright check.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand the logical connection here. IMO, NEW processing should
be a rubber stamp, with only the checking required to satisfy whatever our
needs are for liability purposes.
In my relatively short experience even the legalese check is
definitely
As there's been discussion about the state of the NEW queue lately,
I'd like to announce that at this moment there are 45 packages in NEW,
only one of those being 2 weeks old (excepting problematic packages,
there are 12 of those currently). Mostly thanks to Joerg and Mark this
is down from ~250
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you please elaborate here? The DFSG does not require us to have or
ship source code for non-program works, and if documentation is being
rejected on the basis of a *source* requirement (as distinct from a
licensing issue), then I think we have a
Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since the licence comming with the pdf was, up to what I read and
understand, compatible with DFSG, in particular right to reproduce,
distribute and *modify*, I completely fails to see the motivations
for such a decision.
Let me quote the GR text:
In
Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you claim a PDF file is a binary file, or a program object ? Even
if PDF was a programming language, as proposed in another anwser, it
would fall into the script category, where the executed object is
also the source.
I grant you that it is possible
Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With Like this I mean packages that have been held back in NEW for a
very long time without response or REJECTED with an reason not
acceptable to the maintainer? Does mediating this kind of issues fall
under the authority of the TC, or should they be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libjakarta-ecs-java
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Stephen Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Jon S. Stevens [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/ecs/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libjabsorb-java
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Jabsorb Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://jabsorb.org/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
Would it be a good compromise between SCs #1, #3 and #4 if we made an
exhaustive list of non-free bits in main, and make it our goal that the
list gets smaller between each release and not to add anything to
that list?
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P)
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reject at SMTP etc (and claims that this makes Qmail wide open for
spams is rubish - it's only if/when configured incorrectly that this
becomes a problem)
How can you configure the QMail to send error messages only to
non-forged sender addresses? I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater) writes:
Smail?? [Debian mail agent pre-exim]. Don't think we've _ever_
distributed qmail, just as we stopped distributing Pine once the licence
restrictions became clear for similar reasons. You are making me think
back to 1996-1997 here :)
qmail-src
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why was it removed from Debian GNU/Linux in the first place!?
It's never been in Debian. The source package is in non-free, as the
license didn't permit binary distribution. See e.g.
http://packages.debian.org/etch/qmail-src for some explanation.
--
Miros/law Baran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ah, but it's been there, once. I remember that my first Debian
installation included in the default setup all the accounts used by
qmail (if not the qmail itself).
OK, that's possible, I can only remember back to about 2000, when
there was only the
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what changed? Did Bernstein change his licence!? And can't
the qmail-src maintainer just upload a binary package?
Yes, the license has been changed, QMail is now fully distributable
and modifiable. Dunno if this ITP should actually be considered an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.139-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is the Opera browser not included in Debian?
For the very simple reason that Opera is not open source software.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With Gnus+Mailcrypt, I was unable to vote with a signed but not
encrypted ballot. The voting daemon claimed that there was some
kind of quoted-printable problem. This surprised me: Gnus and
Mailcrypt have not caused problems for me with any previous
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mailcrypt doesn't, as far as I know, support PGP/MIME (RFC 3156).
PGP/MIME is the only standards-conforming way to do OpenPGP signatures
containing non-ASCII text. Check your e-mail if it contains a
top-level Content-Type of multipart/signed. If it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2006 12:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.33.ds1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libgnujaf-java - free implementation of the javabeans activation framework
Changes:
libgnujaf-java (1.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Really added binary-arch build target
Files:
c0a7dd892e60290ce0621fa4e52cfbb3 711 libs
-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblog4j1.2-java - Logging library for java
liblog4j1.2-java-doc - Documentation for liblog4j1.2-java
Closes: 395615
Changes:
jakarta-log4j1.2 (1.2.13-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added binary-arch build
@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libgnujmi-java - free implementation of the java metadata interface
Closes: 395611
Changes:
libgnujmi-java (0.0cvs20050116-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added binary-arch build target (noop) (closes: #395611)
Files
@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libgnujaf-java - free implementation of the javabeans activation framework
Closes: 395610
Changes:
libgnujaf-java (1.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added binary-arch build target (noop) (closes: #395610)
Files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.33-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.33-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.33-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.33-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
[Moving this to -devel, please reply only there, this is not really
voting related stuff. We are talking about things to improve keyring
maintenance, for those not reading -vote.]
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
So first one was the spam problem, keyring-maint is a well-known
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2005 23:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.33-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
aspell-fi - The Finnish dictionary for aspell
ifinnish - A medium-size Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-large - A large Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-small - A small Finnish dictionary for Ispell
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
libhibernate-java?
libhibernate-java is correct as per the Debian Java Packaging Policy.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
--
To
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess that depends on the viewpoint of the reader what the results
were. It is hard to tell if there is a vocal minority making a lot of
noise, or if there is a majority disagreeing with the criteria.
It's actually pretty easy. Count the number
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The proposal make some very exact guidelines like the 98% rule whereas
it is very unprecise in other regards. I find this quite irrating and
thus asking for clarification.
Actually, the 98% rule is not in the proposal. It was given as a
possible rule
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As in real life: good news are no news, bad news are news.
That's the reason to see so often just complaints about ftp-masters
issues and not appreciation for their regular job. Well done.
Yeah, this usually applies to all work, especially
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In most places we already call our operating system simply Debian. I
think we should just go through the website (and CD generation scripts
and such) and remove the few remaining references to GNU/Linux.
This is an annoying problem for us, in my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:00:00 +0300
Source: libgnu-regexp-java
Binary: libgnu-regexp-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa
Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
aspell-fi - The Finnish dictionary for aspell
ifinnish - A medium-size Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-large - A large Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-small - A small Finnish dictionary for Ispell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would it be such a problem if you use a non-Debian email address for
Debian correspondence? As far as I recall I have never used my Debian email
address in the From: field of an email or in a Debian package maintainer
field.
Like I said, it
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got experience with use of greylisting for a mail platform with
over 1M accounts. Enabling greylisting for this platform reduced
delivered spam with 80-90%. This is simply because most of the
infected machines does not attempt a second
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 22:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:30:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:00:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small aspell-fi myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:00:00 +0300
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
Before filing any bugs on this matter to the BTS, I'd like to check
who is responsible for changing the priority of a package? Is it the
ftpmasters or the package maintainer?
The package in question is k3b, which should depend on cdrdao, but
cdrdao is too low priority for that. So, either k3b
[debian-release dropped]
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But do you notice when the same packages keep showing up at the end of
the queue for weeks? The queue can be as small as 1 package inbetween
and that 1 package could still never get build.
Just out of curiosity, what is
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
would have to show that it is not source and the gcc already prooves
you wrong there. If you use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
every parent [1] will have to go through the list of available comics,
evaluate them and disable them.
Isn't that required in any case, if the parent wants to do content
checking? There is absolutely no guarantee that whatever grouping
Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that is the main issue here. I would like to believe that
Debian is capable of showing more respect for other people than
including hotbabe in the distribution would indicate.
First, I'm not saying that I personally feel that hotbabe should be
]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblog4j1.2-java - Logging library for java
liblog4j1.2-java-doc - Documentation for liblog4j1.2-java
Closes: 265746
Changes:
jakarta-log4j1.2 (1.2.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version (differs from 1.2.8 only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:00:00 +0200
Source: oscache
Binary: liboscache-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblog4j1.2-java - Logging library for java
liblog4j1.2-java-doc - Documentation for liblog4j1.2-java
Closes: 265746
Changes:
jakarta-log4j1.2 (1.2.8-7) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Javadocs are now correctly generated (closes
PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblog4j1.2-java - Logging library for java
liblog4j1.2-java-doc - Documentation for liblog4j1.2-java
Closes: 265704 265710
Changes:
jakarta-log4j1.2 (1.2.8-6) unstable; urgency=high
.
* rules script now correctly includes
]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblog4j1.2-java - Logging library for java
liblog4j1.2-java-doc - Documentation for liblog4j1.2-java
Closes: 221236 263869
Changes:
jakarta-log4j1.2 (1.2.8-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Builds from source (closes: #221236) (removed
]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblog4j1.2-java - Logging library for java
liblog4j1.2-java-doc - Documentation for liblog4j1.2-java
Changes:
jakarta-log4j1.2 (1.2.8-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* rules script was missing two removes related to bug #221236.
Files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:30:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small aspell-fi myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:50:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small aspell-fi myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa
Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
aspell-fi - The Finnish dictionary for aspell
ifinnish - A medium-size Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-large - A large Finnish dictionary for Ispell
ifinnish-small - A small Finnish dictionary for Ispell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 15:00:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small aspell-fi myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:00:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:00:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:00:00 +0200
Source: ispell-fi
Binary: ifinnish ifinnish-small myspell-fi wfinnish ifinnish-large
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.86-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.52-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:00:00 +0200
Source: jspwiki
Binary: jspwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.86-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
running again is known for about 5 days now.
You're complaining about a delay of five days in a project run by
volunteers and which has been hit very severly by a break-in? I
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I already contacted Ryan for a different issue and got no response at all.
Go and figure out my motivation to ask him again.
People do have different response times regarding different things. I
may leave trivial questions lying in my mailbox for
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
argument (publicly critising volunteers who are busy is not
productive, even if you point is otherwise valid).
The hell it isn't.
True, if you try to get rid of the current volunteers, then publicly
criticising them is somewhat productive. This usually
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
