Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable

2007-08-05 Thread Kevin Locke
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 19:17 +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: > http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat > >I therefore would like your opinions about this proposal, its > shortcomings, and a strategy to implement it quickly and as widely as > possible. This is great! One possible short

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

2006-11-17 Thread Kevin Locke
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 18:08 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > I'm sure someone can rephrase the above better, my idea being: > > - /bin/dash is the measure (the minimum) > > - It is encouraged that maintainers accept patches and seek ways to > generalize scripts (= pay attention to lintian warnings)

Re: Announcement: Common Power-Management Framework

2005-12-02 Thread Kevin Locke
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 10:47 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Kevin Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fundamentally, our goal is to create an architecture-independent, > > power-system-independent, and power-daemon-independent system to handle > > power-related e

Announcement: Common Power-Management Framework

2005-12-01 Thread Kevin Locke
Greetings -devel, It is my pleasure to announce the creation of a project to create a common power-management framework[1] for Debian (and eventually, the world). This idea, in various forms, has been discussed several times in the past[2][3] with a generally positive response. These ideas have