On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:00:40PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> For ree:
> How portable is scaning /dev/mem between position 0xc and 0xf in
> 512 byte blocks for some magic number as a concept?
This will kernel oops on ARM platforms that don't have RAM starting at
physical address zero
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:11:55AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > We are keeping patches[7] for the armeb port separate, and are ready to
> > contribute them now, or at any future time that is more appropriate.
> > Another chicken-and-egg - are package maintainers expected to accept
> > patch
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:15:32AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > -- Signed, the debian-armeb porting team.
>
> We've always had a policy of asking people to use real names on this
> list. Usually we invoke this for people using pseudonyms, but I think
> it's appropriate for role addresses,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:06:24PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> It's not so unusual anymore since intel introduced the IXP series
> of chips which come with mostly BE oriented reference designs.
The nslu2 itself comes with an ixp4xx CPU, but the armeb port is also
used on a number of i
4 matches
Mail list logo
