On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Additionally, Ubuntu is not more usable for wireless networks than Debian:
the
network configuration only support the useless WEP, no WPA.
I recently bought a System76 laptop with Ubuntu 6.06 pre-installed,
and Network Manager
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:00:01PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
WEP works with network manager but how did you manage WPA via wpa_supplicant
with the GUI setup tools? It only offered WEP when I looked at it.
I have to choose ``Connect to Other Wireless Network...'' (or whatever
the option in
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:48:24PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
So are some widespread programming languages. If you blindly follow bad
examples and bad styles you can dynamite yourself happily without even
noticing, but that does not make them disused or abandoned (on the contrary
some of
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:50:44AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
* The system mta should provide /usr/sbin/sendmail, as well as
mailq, runq, and man pages. The alternative system is able to link
several alternatives.
Right, so three should be no problems there?
* The service mta
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:21:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
We don't allow multiple mtas because a mail-transport-agent is *required* to
provide /usr/sbin/sendmail.
Why can Debian's alternatives system not alleviate this conflict?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:27:45PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
My point was that having to tell mutt manually about every mailing list
is a pain, and people don't do it.
I do.
The List- headers are sufficient, in my experience, to automate this.
They don't support following up to
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:26:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
How about ``pgrep '(g(cc|\+\+)|c(c|\+\+))' | xargs renice 15''?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:03:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Note it is unclear whether the makefiles could be called scripts
Unproven assertion.
How is something proven unclear?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
bincmp allows to quickly compare two binary files printing the offset and
the bytes where the files differ. It should run on just about anything and
it might even support large files ( 4GB) if your system does LFS properly.
Does
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:01:57PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
* URL : http://www.example.org/
Does this package not have an actual web site?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:39:19AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le lun 10 juillet 2006 02:17, Matthew R. Dempsky a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:02:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Another problem is with hosts that do not accept a message from an
MTA unless that MTA
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:39:00AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
In fact, broken servers which don't obey MX will _already_ fail:
[ demonstration that debian.org doesn't accept RCPT TO @debian.org ]
The issue isn't whether MTA's check against MX or A records, it's
whether they check the IP that
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:02:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Another problem is with hosts that do not accept a message from an MTA
unless that MTA is willing to accept replies. This is a common spam
prevention measure.
It also prevents mail from setups that use different servers for
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:48:55AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
+print pa href=\mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe/a to this bug./p
What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
email to a href=$email$email/a.'' to make more
(Is debian-devel the correct list for this?)
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:19:08PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
If not, then we should probably try it
Can it be limited to suspected spam (e.g. mail with a high smtp-time
spamassassin score)? Others may disagree, but I prefer the small
amount of
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:51:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Any suggestions?
Submit a feature request to LSB?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:44:54AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.02.0238 +0200]:
Any suggestions?
Submit a feature request to LSB?
And wait 15 years?
Eh, that's only 2 or 3 debian releases from now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Sure we could just have disclosed the license to -legal beforehand,
but then Sun probably would never talk to us about doing things like
this one again and just tend to OpenSUSE or some other community
distributino next time to
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:27:00PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
1. Make /bin/sh point to /bin/dash
The biggest problem with this seems to be scripts that expect /bin/sh to
point to /bin/bash. Arguably those scripts are broken, but there exists
another choice that avoids that unnecessary
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:35:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?
Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:47:31AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On an otherwise idle box even a process (re-)niced to 19 uses all the
CPU. That might be desirable often but in other cases (e.g. when
CPU temperature is an issue) you might still want to say assign this
process only xy% of CPU
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:01:24AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
On a related note, I'm also working on getting debian-installer going
on a number of MIPS based consumer devices, such as the Netgear
WGT634U wireless router. However, this work has not reached the
maturity of NSLU2 support
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:20:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Matthew R. Dempsky, le Sun 12 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0600, a écrit :
gcc has the -fno-builtin and -fno-builtin-FUNCTION options.
Or better, -fno-hosted and -fhosted...
What makes those options better in this situation
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:21:40AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal.
No, it is not. At least not with a
24 matches
Mail list logo
