On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:18:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest
> > linux packages?
>
> This is in response to a discussion that happened
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
>
> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
> /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs
> when switching to new
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 11, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > waldi proposes to remove old untouched stuff like ax25 and atm.
> Remove from where? The ATM stack is needed to support USB DSL modems,
> and while the code is not beautiful I think it c
Debian Kernel Group Meeting
===
Report by maximilian attems for the Debian Project Kernel List
The meetings were held on 3 sessions over the period of the
2 days during the Paris mini-Debconf, October 2010.
"These are the notes from the formal sessions, se
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
>
> NVIDIA and ATi proprietary drivers do not support xen kernel. If a trunk or
> generic kernel is built in xen pv_ops support, when users switch from normal
> mode to booting xen kernel, X server will not boot. Though we know a user
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:16:58AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > ---
> > 1. Packages for boot loaders that need to be updated whenever the files
> > they load are modified (i.e. those that store a block list) must install
> > hook scripts in /etc/kernel/postinst.d and /etc/kernel/postrm.d, which
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 2. Packages for boot loaders that need to be updated whenever the files
> they load are modified must also install hook scripts in
> /etc/mkinitramfs/post-update.d. Initramfs builders must call these
> scripts using run-parts after they create, update o
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Suno Ano wrote:
> Bastian> Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal
> Bastian> images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images
> Bastian> and does not warrant for an extra image.
>
> As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , l
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> > looks quite bad (latest
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> lack of the equivalent of "vzctl enter" is a critical issue for my
> applications.
looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...
hello,
the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
to be for Lenny).
I thus propose to
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:00:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > I need OpenVZ 2.6.27 with ppp-features available. I was on the
> > point of building the package, but I am not very good in building
> > of kernels and the current openvz i
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:03:37PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> after several rounds of discussion on -devel, we now have a
> new standard defining meta-information to integrate on patches that we
> distribute/apply in our packages:
> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
at a quick look this aga
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
> of the kernel team...
it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep,
no time to sync with ubuntu upstream, latest Debian can be found in
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/usplash.git
--
maks
ps please keep on Cc, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:21:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> As you probably know, back in December last year it was decided [1] that the
> Linux package shipped with Debian Lenny would include non-free code in it
> (so-called "blobs" of binary-only firmware).
>
> While the majority of the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:59:31AM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
>
> 2009/2/20, Steve Langasek :
> > Also unsurprisingly (to me, given my observations that had led to the post
> > in the first place), no one else has yet stepped up to be an alpha porter
> > for squeeze.
>
> I am volunteer to apply
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:24:36PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> At the moment, http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/people/waldi/dkt/ seems
> to be the best source of information about this project. Is that correct?
yep it allmost got shipped with lenny and there is enough time to clear
things for len
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
> >> so those are for him.
>
> > Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> > maintainer of a package that was not up
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:07:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
> is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
> only one can be installed at a time, but it is a minor bug at best, as
> any smart u
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:02:06PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > kernel-img.conf(5) has nothing to do with initramfs-tools.
> > there you'll find do_bootloader documented.
>
> I am glad you are referring to thi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:43:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
> Please someone help look at bug#494422.
>
> What is wrong with my judgement[1]?
you are totaly misinformed as usual,
don't mess with bugs you have zero knownledge with.
> It seems to me that bug#494
hello,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>
> The following packages are up for adoption:
>
> * gawk
> * gawk-doc (non-free)
arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
so those are for him.
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:44:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:23:19AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> > to not be merged upstream.
>
> So OpenVZ is also out of reach.
openv
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> Of course it is when it is to prevent a fairly substantial regression
> from etch. Whether etch should have shipped a dom0 or not is a
> different question and a little late to complain about now; we just have
> to do the best w
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:45:21AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:34:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > That SLES forward-port for 2.6.26 is not acceptable based on Debian kernel
> > patch policy: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
>
> Which
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:44:00PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
> >> > > I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27..
> >
> > Lenny will not support 64bit, no
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine
> which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's
> kernel. I would like to do that in a different way.
>
> If we will not see dom0 in lin
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Like said, this thread was started to discuss about possible options of
> getting xen dom0 support into lenny, and I pasted that git link to give a
> status update of pv_ops work happening atm.
current best guess is lenny+half.
h
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> &g
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
> > important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated
> > into vanilla linus kernels soon
[ stripping cc list to relevant bug report + devel for general info ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> Given the pace of kernel releases, I do not believe 2.6.26 is possible
> fo
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> > Early March 2008
> > Very soft freeze
> [...]
> > Mid of July 2008
> > Full freeze
>
> I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:34:11PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:49:20PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > but currently willing to work on i'd nack fjp requests.
> > of course if no progress has been made in a month,
> > his reque
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:27:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > I'd like to work on SELinux packages and bugs.
>
> That's wonderful, thanks for your help offering!
>
> Still, if I'm interpreting cor
> The priority of selinux packages was changed from optional to standard,
> fairly shortly before the release of Etch.
>
> I propose to revert that change before Lenny. The basic reason is that
> the selinux packages have basically been unmaintained since the release
> of Etch.
I'd like to work
Hello May!
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:38:03AM -0800, May Hwang wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update. So this etch-n-half is the next Debian release, which
> already have HighPoint driver included? When etch-n-half will official hit
> the market?
etch-n-half is the planed Linux kernel upgrade for t
hello May,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:31:29AM -0800, May Hwang wrote:
>
> Thanks! Is this the first time you head about HighPoint? We used to only
> offer Cost effective RAID controller or if refer to Linux community these
> are the Fake RAID category.
not the first time,
i had followed the hpt
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:48:42AM -0800, May Hwang wrote:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=tree;f=dr
> ivers/scsi;h=03a18a7adc45ab39658ac83cf90e56e43598ee3e;hb=HEAD.
i know if you followed the link to the kernel svn change,
you would have seen that the commit w
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:29:48PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 01 février 2008 à 07:38 -0800, May Hwang a écrit :
> > Dear Maks,
> >
> > Thanks for the update. So this etch-n-half is the next Debian release, which
> > already have HighPoint driver included? When etch-n-half will o
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, May Hwang wrote:
>
> Thanks, please help include our driver in etch-n-half.
>
forgot to mention that your posting gave you good german tech press
-> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/102841
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Dear May,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, May Hwang wrote:
> Dear Margarita,
>
> Thanks, please help include our driver in etch-n-half.
>
> Please find Latest HighPoint Source files in 2.6.24 are located at:
> drivers\scsi\hptiop.c
> drivers\scsi\hptiop.h
> Documentation\scsi\hptiop.txt
>
> 2.6.24-rc8-mm
MODULES=dep
The size of the generated initramfs of initramfs-tools
in the case of MODULES=dep improved since 0.90a version.
i'd like to get more tester feedback on that setting.
-> /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
WARNING:
The ide subsys has a funky /sys usage where
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:23:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070726 11:40]:
> > For the libata-pata support we need to change fstab on several arches to
> > not break all systems which uses them.
> >
> > We need to decide which arches needs this rewrite now
i'd appreciate if you post such questions to the corresponding
development mailing list which is debian-kernel for initramfs
questions.
thanks
> Current pratice is to only call `update-initramfs -u', that is, to only
> update the most recent initramfs. This however will break older
> initramfses
> Debian logcheck Team
> logcheck-database -- config:17 logcheck-database/standard-rename-note
removed in svn, will disappear on next upload.
> Debian logcheck Team
> logcheck -- config:14 logcheck/install-note
> logcheck -- config:17 logcheck/changes
first gone, second added retroactively
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:46:59PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> I'm currently considering whether to change partman-auto-lvm so that the
> swap partition is created as a lvm lv rather than a separate partition,
> and I'd like to ask for some comments and feedback before doing so.
ack. cool,
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> > it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
>
> But it doesn't make
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Guido Trotter wrote:
>
> Absolutely true! The current xen team is fully agrees on this position!
>
> Guido
xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
it
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:51:17PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
>
> Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for
> Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases,
> and this is what upstream needs the most.
the -rc kernels are build in experimental, s
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > N-117 = Mon 30 Jul 06: freeze essential toolchain, kernels
>
> Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
> should be together with the
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Most kernel hackers don't care that much about 2.4 any more.
>
> This is of course one of the reasons why users feel left alone by the
> kernel developers.
2.2 went also in deep freeze for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: klibc
Version : 1.0.14
Upstream Author : H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/klibc/
* License : GPL/BSD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: initramfs
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/Initramfs
* License : PUBLIC DOMAIN
56 matches
Mail list logo
