> Since m68k pretty much depends on the gcc-4.1 transition to make it in
> again, I would suggest that we (as in, the m68k port) make the switch to
> GCC4.1 as the default already. This will allow us to verify that stuff
> actually builds and works, and to catch up with building those that fail
> w
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
> > heading in the wrong direction again for being a release candidate. I see
> > 12 buildds activel
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:20:30PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
> > If I compile a trivial foo.c in the unstable chroot with gcc-3.4, and
> > then immediately try to run it, it segfaults.
>
> You've hit #327780.
>
> m68k-build: could anyone with root on crest please downgrade binutils in
> all chro
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I just hand over the readseq package to Michael Schmitz. He is obviousely
> > much more competent to maintain the package than me. We agreed not to
> > go the bureocratic orphan and adopt. The next upload will just
> I just hand over the readseq package to Michael Schmitz. He is obviousely
> much more competent to maintain the package than me. We agreed not to
Meaning I've used it a lot, including local modifications and such. And I
have a moderate interest in keeping that package around
> Well, today I went and picked up the m68k machine kindly donated
> by Anton Emmerfors some months ago.
>
> It was already packaged and ready to go, so all I had to do was to
> take it to the postoffice, and send it off to Ingo Juergensmann
> in Germany, who will do OS and network card installati
6 matches
Mail list logo
