Re: Kernel question: initrd/cramfs

2003-07-13 Thread Nenad Antonic
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you trying to use initrd anyway? It's much easier to build the drivers into the kernel. Now, I must agree with that. At the begining, it looked as a good idea to compile one kernel which can be used on scsi and ide systems, etc.

Re: Kernel question: initrd/cramfs

2003-07-11 Thread Nenad Antonic
Jean Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There no ext2 nor ext3 modules on your initrd.img-2.4.22-pre3c0, are those filesystems compiled in the kernel ? ext2 is compiled in the kernel: CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y After a few days, let me summarise: a) 2.4.21 kernel as it is in debian kernel-sources

Kernel question: initrd/cramfs

2003-07-07 Thread Nenad Antonic
Since it is a moving target, kernel compilation is a difficult subject that may confuse even the most admired developer: [Debian Reference] What is the status of initrd kernel building process (only on i386), while using stock kernels (from kernel.org)?

Re: Kernel question: initrd/cramfs

2003-07-07 Thread Nenad Antonic
On # Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:38:35 -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: RAMDISK: cramfs filesystem found at block 0 RAMDISK: loading 1032 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk... done. Freeing initrd memory: 1032k freed cramfs: wrong magic Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on