Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nick Leverton
This is really an ITA for the existing unicorn and unicorn-source packages
which were somewhat precipitately removed from Debian two weeks ago.
* Package name: unicorn
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Frode Isaksen
* URL
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:10:26AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Nick Leverton (19/04/2009):
> > This is really an ITA for the existing unicorn and unicorn-source
> > packages which were somewhat precipitately removed from Debian two
> > weeks ago.
>
> Well, I don
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:49:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Nick Leverton (22/04/2009):
> > Thanks for your interest in my IT(re)P and your comments.
>
> No problem.
>
> > Of the stated reasons for removal:
> >
> > > | Please remove unicorn:
>
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 05:08:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Ben Hutchings
> > > init systems?
> >
> > aekeech6 can, at least.
>
> Given that yours is written in C and is therefore inflexible, and mine's
> in Python and
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 01:54:20AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 06:06 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > I see.
> > Who knows what they'll break next.
>
> Do you use any particular obscure features that I could suggest?
Networking, keyboards, rotating media ...
Nick
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nick Leverton
* Package name: mp3cat
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Tom Clegg
* URL : http://tomclegg.net/mp3cat
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : reads, writes, splits and combines MP3 files
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:48:48PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Depending on your answers, I'll upload a new version with an updated
> maintainer/uploader list. (and with a correction in the bug list which is
> missing commas)
Hi Dominique and all,
My situation is uncertain at the moment an
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:33:33PM +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
> > We already have $pkglibdir and $pkgdatadir for those. There is no
> > technical need for a new directory in /usr, and it doesnt improve
> > anything for users.
>
> Possibly not for the users
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:19:40PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Packages in level 2 build-depend on packages in level 1 (and so on up
> the stack), so in general level 1 needs to be built before level 2.
>
> (This is mostly only of practical interest to people managing these
> transitions, thou
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 02:21:37PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:54:02PM +0000, Nick Leverton wrote:
> >
> > Is there a usual way to generate the dependency level lists ? I ask
> > because I have a transition coming up for one of my packages,
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:48:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> There is no one way to deal with this, we should only deal with this
> on a case-by-case basis and use a number of strategies. ...
> encourage our upstreams to rename and or work it out between them. If
> they are willing, great,
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:14:41PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/01/2012 03:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Thomas Goirand writes:
> >> The other sane way is to mark files not in /etc as conffiles. It
> >> semantically sux a bit, but if we have no choice because of upstream
> >> decisions (
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:46:07AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> While I agree that forking upstream is not necessarily the right thing
> to do, allow me to ask some things just so I understand things
> better...
>
> Do I understand you correctly that an empty configuration file in /etc
> wil
13 matches
Mail list logo
