Re: NoX idea

2005-03-02 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:53:30 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Christoph Berg > > | Re: Michael Koch in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > is "rm /etc/rc2.d/S99gdm" not easy enough for you ? > | > | Please don't recommend rm'ing the S* links. Rename them to K* instead > | or else they w

Re: /etc under svk

2005-02-16 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:00:37 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another topic that needs to be addressed with putting /etc under > version control is file modes and owner/group. cvs doesn't handle that > well at all. Version management is different from backups, while both share some c

Re: what is /.udev for ?

2005-02-09 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:01:00 -0500, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:13:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > must it be mounted for everyone, or is it merely a convenience/necessity > > > for a few people in specific situations? if the latter is true, wouldn't >

Re: what is /.udev for ?

2005-02-09 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:57:27 +0100, GOMBAS Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:46:03PM +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: > > I've always found the existence of ./dev a bit weird in a directory > > listing of /. > > I'd rather have it in /

Re: what is /.udev for ?

2005-02-09 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:07:33 -0800 (PST), Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maykel Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I recently realized that I had /.dev, after that, I rm -fr it what > > rendered my system unbootabled. > > What led you to do such a thing? The idea "I don't know

Re: [Ipw2100-devel] debian, ipw2200 and wlan0

2005-02-07 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:17:20 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ma, 2005-02-07 kello 16:50 +0100, Mike Hommey kirjoitti: > > Wireless interfaces should be called wlan%d, not eth%d > > Why is this important? Why does the name of a network interface matter? > All the tools in Debian

Re: removed start links are back after upgrade

2005-01-12 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:55:03 +0100, Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm thinking have "update-rc.d -f foo disable" do the same thing as > > "update-rc.d -f foo remove && update-rc.d foo stop stop 0", and > > clearly document this in the manual page, so t