Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: llconf
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~oku/llconf/
* License : GPL
Description :
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 20:25 +0100, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:54:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> > Correct. So, why not use mv?
>
> Add a new "--move" flag to dh_installfiles, come up with some exact
> numbers showing the build time/disk usage savings for your favorite B
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 21:36 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 04:50:27PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Debian is a distribution which tries to provide good software, implying
> > changes if necessary. Wireless interfaces should be called wlan%d, not
> > eth%d, and upstream d
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 18:45 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Naming wired network eth%d and wireless wlan%d would make things a lot
> > easier. For example, it is easier to find out whether to start ifplugd
> > or waproamd
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 18:17 +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ma, 2005-02-07 kello 16:50 +0100, Mike Hommey kirjoitti:
> > Wireless interfaces should be called wlan%d, not eth%d
>
> Why is this important? Why does the name of a network interface matter?
> All the tools in Debian that can deal with n
should I write my
> dependencies manually, not using dh_shlibdeps?
You can use debian/shlibs. You will find documentation about this
in the man page for dpkg-shlibdeps.
> If you answer, PLEASE CC to me, as I don't read debian-devel
> regularly.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.'&
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Sigh. So if Atmel says these files are no longer GPL'ed, but are just
> > freely distributable, it could at least go to non-free?
>
> Yes.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:41:58PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:36:31PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > I am sure these lines in the files can be removed, by bugging the
> > Atmel people, or at least 'override' it with an 'It is okay'
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:25:44PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > If the hex files are GPLed, they are probably not distributable -- hex .c
> > > files probably do not fall into the GPL's definition of source
&
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:00:48PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > But you do not seem to see my point: the human readable sources of the
> > firmware files are _not_ open. The hex files, ie. the compiled form,
> >
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:41:32PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:52:22PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > There may also be issues with the firmware: the source is /not/ GPL'ed, but
> > the hex files from Atmel are. I am not sure if this is
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:26:56PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:01:40PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Okay, but you placed an email into the URL field.
> Cut'n'Paste erro. It's correct in the package.
Fine.
> > This is okay. Atmel al
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:06:32PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:43:30PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > That is my email addrss in the URL field... not the site to
> > download. It is really
> > http://at76c503a.berlios.de/
&g
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:04:45PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: at76c503a-source
> Version : 0.11.beta5
> * URL : Oliver Kurth
> * License : GPL
> Description : at76c503a d
se it
like that correctly.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.org
`-
When sending passwords, please use my gpg key. That's what it's good for.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
wants it, because I sometimes use it.
Two bugs, one of them specific to large memory systems, the other
contains a patch. Shame on me...
For more nformation start at my QA page:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?gpg_key=451EAB1B
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Ku
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:04:45PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:08:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > also sprach Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.22.1109 +0200]:
>
, I always build my own
kernel using make-kpkg - with cryptoloop patch. But that's not the
point. If I find that that patch conflicts with the Debian kernel
source, I would get very irritated.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `&#
ts. It may work with most packages, but not all. prefix is meant
to be the final destination.
> DESTDIR is convenient, but not supported by as many packages (gcc does
> support it though).
If DESTDIR is not supported, we should make it to support it, and send
the fix to upstream.
Greetings,
Oliver
-
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: x25-utils
Version : 2.3.93
Upstream Author : Jonathan Simon Naylor
* URL : http://www.baty.hanse.de/linux-x25/utils/
* License : unknown (have to clear that up, probably B
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pc300
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Cyclades Coperation
* URL : ftp://ftp.cyclades.com/pub/cyclades/pc300/linux/
* License : GPL
Description : utilities for conf
t if the cable is pulled. This is useful on laptops with
onboard network adapters, since it will only configure the interface
when a cable is really connected.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintain
is rpm in Debian.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.org
`-
When sending passwords, please use my gpg key. That's what it's good for.
pgpRfMIoVk7a0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:01:35PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Interessting analysis. Many things that hold up the release can only be
> > solved by active and experienced maintainers since the packages are often
> > es
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:27:38AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:50:21 +0200
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Steve Lamb
> > | How many local users are you going to have on a laptop whose correct
> > SMTP| server changes as a function of their location?
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:48:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:29:06AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > >
w.bahn.de.
> > Wien is not exactly close to western europe.
>
> But not all that far also.
Pretty close, I'd say, writing from near Munich...
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.org
`-
pgpQVwAmo7ayb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ge that.
It was copied and pasted from the upstream description...
> > Description : leightweight C library for daemons
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.org
`-
pgpiKXjowq8GN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-10
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdaemon
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Lennart Poettering
* URL : http://www.stud.uni-hamburg.de/~lennart/projects/libdaemon/
* License : GPL
Description : leigh
g it. ;)
This seems to be similar to termpkg, which I recently uploaded, a few
days ago. It has not yet been accepted, should happen this week.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.org
`-
pgpVSAFZq2jEv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uld be the right way to fix this ?
>
> - file 24 bug reports
> - fix the FTP archive manually by copying the packages to pool/
> - it's not really a problem, so do nothing
Option #2. We had this discussed here several times before.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :&#x
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: termpkg
Version : 3.3
Upstream Author : Joe Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxlots.com/~termpkg/
* License : GPL
Description : remote modem utilities
t creates it? It's trivial, and I
can recycle some code from masqmail.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
.''`.
: :' :Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.org
`-
pgpfGn8NFLXoE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:09:31AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:57:05PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Would this work? Or would you need to be authenticated first
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:20:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:14AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> > see if you still don't have a problem. Or try giving the server a local (to
> > it) address after MAIL FROM: the server should complain unless you're on a
> > network which
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:40:27AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-04 13:11:40 +0900]:
> >
> > I'm not sure but after recent upgrading of unstable
> > I found /tmp/root
> >
> > And can anyone guess which package created this /tmp/root ?
>
> Try this on you
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:13:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 21:52]:
> > Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
>
> I tried adding all applicants again. I have probably missed some, but
> most should be the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:38:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:10:39PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Never underestimate the power of Google's cache. :-)
> >
> > Google's cache was unfortunately out of date, too. So, while we
> > haven't lost everything, we
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:59:14AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:52:13PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:56:46PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> ...
> > > What I'm saying is that to must have a mail-ser
ing* configuration file?
> >
> > If the default configuration data in the file do something you don't want.
>
> For example...
autofs. First thing I do when I install autofs in at networked environmemt is
rm /etc/auto.*
because I want to use the NIS maps.
Greetings
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:05:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:52:12PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:18:38PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > So - what should I do to handle this? Can the priority of libssl0.9.6 be
&g
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:18:38PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi *,
Hi Torsten :-)
>
> Today I was convinced by Stephen Frost that I can just enable SSL support
> in the OpenLDAP packages I maintain. No problem so far, but:
>
> - libldap2 is Priority: important
> - this change will mak
Debian should not be a popularity contest.
Who said that it should?
I think it is a nice idea. I would love to see this in Debian.
Greetings,
Oliver
--
Oliver Kurth
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://leinekanal.de
pgpYvCGf187d8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
43 matches
Mail list logo
