Re: IPv4-capable XDMCP server in Debian squeeze?

2010-05-29 Thread Per Lundberg
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:16:06 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote: >> p...@terah:/etc/sysctl.d$ sudo netstat -l -n -p | grep 177 >> udp6       0      0 :::177                  :::* >>          1632/xdm >> > That'

Re: IPv4-capable XDMCP server in Debian squeeze?

2010-05-29 Thread Per Lundberg
1632/xdm Do you have any active XDM setup where you could try this yourself? As I hinted in my previous email, I'm not 100% sure of this, but doesn't the above udp6 line mean that it will *only* work from an ipv6-capable client...? -- Best regards, Per Lundberg -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: IPv4-capable XDMCP server in Debian squeeze?

2010-05-29 Thread Per Lundberg
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Carl Johnson wrote: Hi Carl, and thanks for your reply! (I'll include my full original email, since I extended the audience to the debian-devel list as well) > Per Lundberg writes: > >> Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server availab

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Per Lundberg
> "SH" == Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The reason I ask is because I've been having this exact problem >> with gpm lately. I like to start it occasionally, because it >> interfers with my X configuration SH>You might be interested in the `-R' option of gpm

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Per Lundberg
> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EB> it leaves the decision where it belongs with me. Yeah. I think you're right about this. I just got a little confused with my gpm problems, I guess. EB> if that is true (and your only removing SOME of the symlinks EB> not ALL

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Per Lundberg
> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a >> display manager, your system will boot up in X. EB> is that not what you wanted when you installed *dm ? Maybe, but having the option to get into console mode too woul

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Per Lundberg
> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EB> perhaps because in the default configuration there is no EB> display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X. Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a display manager, your system will boot up in X. To get it to

X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Per Lundberg
(Sorry if this has been discussed earlier, and/or this is the wrong list...) How come Debian don't have a "non-X" runlevel, like some other distributions, in the default configuration? I think this would be pretty convenient. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Re: Galeon and Debian?

2000-08-30 Thread Per Lundberg
> "RB" == Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RB> ** CRITICAL **: file RB> ../../../../../embedding/browser/gtk/src/gtkmozembed.cpp: line RB> 298 (void gtk_moz_embed_init(GtkMozEmbed *)): assertion RB> `retval == TRUE' failed. FWIW, this is exactly the same error t

Re: netscape crashes on potato

1999-05-23 Thread Per Lundberg
hi netscape-base-4 4.5-1 Popular World-Wide-Web browser software > (bas > hi netscape-java-4 4.5-1 Popular World-Wide-Web browser software > (jav Oh, BTW, I used the "netscape4" package for installation. HTH. -- .,---.-..-.-.---.-.-.-.--+-.-.---.-

Re: Netscape under unstable...

1999-05-21 Thread Per Lundberg
nning Netscape (4.08, 4.5 and 4.6) on two unstable boxes without any problems at all. But maybe that's just me. :) -- .,---.-..-.-.---.-.-.-.--+-.-.---.-.---.----.-.-,. ; Per Lundberg |<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : : "Down, not across" :http://www.plundis.cx; `^--.-+---+--.+-+-+---+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+--++^'