ckages, or up to date unstable versions).
>
> The problem occurs right after I've installed some software, so all the
> necessary data is still available in current testing/unstable/wherever.
apt-get --download-only install \
$(apt-cache showsrc $PKG | grep Binary: | cut -d':' -f
.
>
> As pointed out several times, the source package in the ubuntu archive
> is NOT different to the source package in the debian archive. The
> binary package have been rebuilt in an different environment, which
> can caus different dependencies on the resulting binary package.
You sai
ed manually (in which case it is read anyway) it
> can be saved.
Then perhaps you should use an encrypted tunnel to a safer location. I
wouldn't send mails through that channel, even if it was work related.
You should value your integrity more than that.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson
ode across
the network for each job."
Sounds like it might work out of the box if you just exclude "localhost"
from DISTCC_HOSTS.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
e
> biggest problem will probably be (a) getting all those pathnames right.
Wouldn't it be possible to use something like distcc for this?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
programs for pleasure.
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/stalls.html ?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
houldn't be
> > shipping it in sarge if it's non-free.)
>
> Why not move it to non-free? Or you defining sarge as main only?
> We haven't voted to remove non-free yet.
I thought non-free wasn't part of Debian.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, h
ut the machine
> name.
I thought it was about the service name, the machine already got one.
Quoting Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The machine itself has a name already (quantz)."
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprin
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> NMUer time is better spent on really unmaintained packages.
Amen.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpydQfe90SCO.
ol.
For you the NMU seems like a waste of time, but it was not a waste of
_your_ time, nor of the current maintainers (except for looking at a
diff which changed nothing but the build-depends field from what I can
tell, w/o looking at neither the package nor the NMU).
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mat
would have been good, it wouldn't have made the
maintainer aware of the problem earlier (unless the NMU was delayed
until the maintainer had a time to fix it himself, of course).
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:26:03PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> Because some admins, unlike the rest of us, thinks users want's to have
s/want's/wants
> software in their local language and use local keyboard layout, then we
> indeed want's to have our software in
their local language and use local keyboard layout, then we
indeed want's to have our software in english and us keyboard layout
with local as an switchable option, right?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF
atter of HOURS
(well, that didn't work for me, dunno why)."
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgp3nT5ZfeSil.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(plex86 development is a bit stalled at the moment). IMHO it's
> very usable, bochs is more stable but slower. For all supported
> systems read the documentation of the packages.
plex86 is Debian specific isn't it? Because, if it's not, I'm sure
plex86 got some mailing list
ws XP, FreeBSD, etc on any of them.
Is it at all possible? Useable?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpyCBIaqXJdT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t-cache`
apt: /usr/bin/apt-get
apt: /usr/bin/apt-cache
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpoSivUMfSFb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
original post said:
"and the EOF is ignored. The correction is to make the type of
variable c int."
I guess that's why it says "in OTHER contexts".
--
Peter Mathiasson | GPG Fingerprint:
E-Mail: peter(at)mathiasson(dot)nu | A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066
W
://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
> >
> > But it exists here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
> > "help" is a tag, not a severity level.
>
> Well now I'm confused. I can now see help but in the severity section.
> So it is a
19 matches
Mail list logo
