On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> > Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
> > investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
> > value with a %u or %d format string, which will break if si
> [1] Useful fragment for cross platform shell scripts:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # Do the Solaris Dance:
> if [ ! -d ~root ] ; then
> exec /usr/xpg4/bin/sh $0 "$@"
> fi
>
sigh.. okay, my "correction" had bugs, too :-)
better as
if [ ! -d ~root -a -x /usr/xpg4/bin/sh ] ; then
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:45:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> [1] Useful fragment for cross platform shell scripts:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # Do the Solaris Dance:
> if [ ! -d ~root ] ; then
> exec /usr/xpg4/bin/sh $0 "$@"
> fi
Umm.. Ick it woudl be better as
if [ -x /usr/xpg4/bin/sh ] ;
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 07:38:00AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> (Personally, I'd vote against a proposal to make it mandatory. We have more
> than enough release-critical issues at the moment - cleaning up
> documentation to conform completely to W3C standards and recommendations is
> probab
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:29:31PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I have only ever seen browsers do this kind of nonsense. I have never seen
> nslookup, dig, or host, attempt such lame lookup methods before.
live and learn:
--
Script started on Tu
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> ...
> > Particularly since I found it by doing a dns lookup of
> > keyserver.debian.org
>
> keyring.debian.org is the secret sauce
>
perhaps the appropriate person for debian might put in a CNAME record?
Has anyone noticed that someone has pseudo-hijacked
keyserver.debian.org.com
Is this supposed to be there?
It seems to be kinda worrying that someone has registered that hostname.
Particularly since I found it by doing a dns lookup of
keyserver.debian.org
and the host I'm on, fell through to au
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:50:51PM +0200, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
>...
> And it doesn't make sense if I compile the program with lesstif, as long
> as upstream doesn't want to support it, because if people file bug
> reports against snd in debian, and I forward it to him, he'll most
> probably not
[ Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr writes ]
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:43:05 -0800,
> Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So headers should be optimized for group discussion.
> > Replying to individuals is a secondary function.
>
> not at all. replying
[ Craig Sanders writes ]
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:26:25AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > And in the case of the debian mailing lists, you should "reply to" the
> > list.
>
> bullshit.
>
> some replies should go to the list, and some replies should be pri
[ D-Man writes ]
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:30:39PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > Funny, you just did exactly that. If your mailreader was better, you would
> > have a better functioning group-reply.
>
> Umm, no I wasn't complaining about my mailreader, but one
[ D-Man writes ]
>
> A different list that I am on does the Reply-To munging. This means
> that if I hit group-reply (when I use an MUA that doesn't understand
> lists) the list will get 2 copies : 1 in the To and 1 in the CC field.
> Is this really what you want? Getting double mail on the list
[ Miles Bader writes ]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> > I guess YOUR mailreader is "too old or disfunctional to be worth
> > discussing"
> >
> > I did not request you to Cc me.
> > But you replied to the list AND me.
>
> Because tha
[ Nathan E Norman writes ]
>...
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:11:21PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > I guess YOUR mailreader is "too old or disfunctional to be worth
> > discussing"
> > > I did not request you to Cc me.
> > But you replied to the list AND
[ Miles Bader writes ]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> > As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual
> > editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the
> > reasonable thing and assumes you want to
[ Miles Bader writes ]
> Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
> > reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> Because it's completely wrong.
>
> Doing so takes the choice of who to reply to (the sender or the list)
> out of the hands of th
[ D-Man writes ]
> ...
> Try mutt and its "L" command. The "L" command means "list-reply", aka
> only send a message to the list, not to all recepients. It also sets
> a header flag so that other well-behaved MUA's don't send you an extra
> copy of their replies since you will get it on the list
[ Ben Armstrong writes ]
>
> So, for subsections perhaps:
>
>...
> Education/Language
> qvocab
I'd love an Education/Language section too.
I'm not really happy with any of the Menu choices available for my
"kdrill" program, which is a vocabulary quiz program,and dictionary for
kanji.
18 matches
Mail list logo
