Re: Bug#514411: [Resolvconf-devel] Bug#514411: resolvconf breaks all network operations

2009-02-07 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Thomas Hood wrote: iface eth0 inet static address 172.17.207.12 gateway 172.17.207.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 I'll assume that interface eth0 is configured using the ifup command. Add this line to the iface eth0 stanza in /etc/network/interfaces dns-nameservers 172.17.207.1 172.17.207.18

What should postrm purge actually do?

2008-06-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Is it written down anywhere what postrm purge is supposed to do? Presumably remove some set of files, but what criteria should be used to choose which? The policy document is not much help; s6.8 says when it is called, but not what it actually needs to do. I can't find more detail, though of

Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA)

2008-05-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe there should also be a clasification of packages according to how bad would a bug be in them for the whole system, so that patches in those could be more carefully reviewed. Perhaps uploads could come with the diff against the last version (or a link

Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset)

2008-05-14 Thread Richard Kettlewell
BALLABIO GERARDO [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: if I understand correctly, the problem was that openssl used some segment of uninitialized memory as a source of entropy, and the offending patch cleared it. This is not correct. Clearing tmpbuf before reading /dev/urandom is harmless. The broken

Thomas Dickey, your mail is bouncing...

2006-02-19 Thread Richard Kettlewell
+ From: Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Face: h[Hh-7npeb4/eW[]sat,I3O`t8A`(ej.H!F4\8|;ih)`7{@:A~/j1}gTt4e7-n*F?.Rl^ F\{jehn7.KrO{!7=:(@J~].[{v9!1qZY,{EJxg6?Er4Y7Ng2\FtZW?r\c.!4DXH5PWpgaha +r0NzP?vnz:e/knOY)PI- X-Boydie: NO X-Mailer: Norman To: Thomas Dickey [EMAIL

Re: Bug#312669: /sbin/ifconfig: Add ifconfig to user path

2005-06-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Kettlewell dijo [Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:42:01PM +0100]: I think it doesn't go far enough. mv sbin/* bin rmdir sbin ln -s bin sbin ...and the problem goes away forever. You type too fast. Are you _sure_ no two Debian packages

Re: Bug#312669: /sbin/ifconfig: Add ifconfig to user path

2005-06-13 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: astronut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree. The type of user who is likely to be using the ifconfig command on a regular basis is the type of user who probably already has sbin in their path. (Power user, sysadmin's nonprivleged account, etc.). Yes.

Re: Bug#312669: /sbin/ifconfig: Add ifconfig to user path

2005-06-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem here is that ifconfig must be in sbin by FHS and by history (would break too many scripts). So moving is not an option. I can however put a symlink in /bin, however I am not sure how other DDs think about it, as this will set a bad

a couple of missing sources for stable

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Kettlewell
I use debmirror to maintain a local Debian archive, off ftp.uk.debian.org and www.mirror.ac.uk. I get errors regarding the following files: dists/potato/main/source/games/xdigger_1.0.10-1.diff.gz dists/potato/main/source/games/xdigger_1.0.10-1.dsc

Re: many scripts fail if /tmp/tempfile.$$ exists - local DOS vulnerability

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Jakob Lell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: many shell scripts use tempfiles like /tmp/tempfile.$$. This creates insecure tempfile vulnerabilities. One commonly used fix for this problem is to use set -e or/and set -C in the shell script. This makes the whole script fail if one command fails or pipes

Re: Why back-porting patches to stable instead of releasing a new package.

2003-07-23 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you start asking you will likely find more than thousand packages where someone will have a good reason for an update of the package in Debian 3.0. If only every 10th of these updates introduces a new bug (IMHO a conservative estimation) these packages

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-19 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Panu A Kalliokoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Kettlewell wrote: I think you've answered your own question; it _can_ known which soname to use, and to discover it, it should check the version of the compiler. I'm not sure whether you're actually proposing changing the SONAMEs so

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-18 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Panu Kalliokoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve Langasek wrote: [...compiler ABI is part of library ABI...] You're right; I'm just more worried about the more practical point that if a library, when being built, cannot know which SONAME it should install itself under (it would involve

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-17 Thread Richard Kettlewell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Loewis) writes: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My concern is that locally compiled apps built against C++ libraries other than libstdc++ will silently stop working on upgrade. This is certainly not the most important issue facing us in the transition,

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Add a Conflict with the non-`c' version of the package. So it will be impossible to have both the old and new library packages on the system simultaneously. That's broken. Why don't we just change the sonames? Because upstream chooses

Re: Please don't do this (code fragment)

2002-01-14 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Kettlewell wrote: Even if you don't care about weird platforms, x -1 is a ridiculously obscure test in this context; to achieve the same effect it would be much clearer to make x unsigned and do x = (unsigned)INT_MAX. I find x = (unsigned

realpath c (was Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.)

2002-01-12 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Richard Kettlewell writes: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] + + /* follow any symlinks to the mailbox */ + memset(folder_path, 0, sizeof folder_path); + if (lstat (lf-folder_path, st) != -1 S_ISLNK (st.st_mode) + realpath (lf-folder_path

Re: How many people need locales?

2001-09-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Ari Makela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you take a look at even just European languages you can see that most of them cannot be written with a-zA-Z. Actually, I think only English can. It can't here, if you want to refer to the local currency in the conventional way. --

Re: How many people need locales?

2001-09-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Radovan Garabik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean-Marc Chaton wrote: - Almost all French users (and I think I can extrapolate: all the users who need to read messages with non-ascii chars) need to set up a '/etc/locale.gen' to see them correctly for example with mutt, and that even though

out-of-date ftp.debian.org

2000-12-29 Thread Richard Kettlewell
At http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=79821 you will find a discussion between the X maintainer and me. It turns out that although he had received notification that the updated package had been installed, ftp.debian.org did not reflect this. ttfn/rjk

PING of Maintainer Address richard@elmail.co.uk

1997-06-14 Thread Richard Kettlewell
I've had these messages before, and followed the instructions for stating that I no longer maintain the packages in question. But they still keep appearing. Can somebody *please* sort this out, and tell me that they have done so? (Both packages are, AFAIK, utterly obsolete and should not exist

Re: PING of Maintainer Address richard@elmail.co.uk

1997-06-14 Thread Richard Kettlewell
and at work, and hope one day to be able to contribute some more of my time to it. But I don't have the time at present.) -- Richard Kettlewell, ElectricMail Ltd phone: +44 1223 501333 fax: +44 1223 501444 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Bug#4536: svgalib1 does not work with new source packaging standard

1996-09-21 Thread Richard Kettlewell
again that the svgalib packages could do with a new maintainer, as I currently do not have time to do further work on them. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4383: remote filesystems mounted too early

1996-09-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
is started. netstd_nfs or netstd_misc may be a sensible place to do this. (It's not clear to me that this is a bug in precisely one package.) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4388: emacs mail-mode fails RFC822 section 3.4.7

1996-09-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
be the same colour independent of letter case. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4376: vm doesn't use /etc/emacs/site-start.d

1996-09-02 Thread Richard Kettlewell
soon, honest.. l-) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4353: fcntl.2 references nonexistent manpage

1996-08-31 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: manpages Version: 1.11-4 SEE ALSO open(2), dup2(2), F_DUPFD(2), F_GETFD(2), F_GETFL(2), F_GETLK(2), socket(2). but: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ man F_GETLK No manual entry for F_GETLK -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#4354: movemail doesn't work

1996-08-31 Thread Richard Kettlewell
executable.) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4347: emacs html-mode + font-lock highlights too greedily

1996-08-30 Thread Richard Kettlewell
the contents of the b.../b pairs. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4327: hsearch(3) man page patches

1996-08-29 Thread Richard Kettlewell
-END -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4295: majordom passwd line is wrong

1996-08-27 Thread Richard Kettlewell
/etc/passwd has majordom:*:30:30:majordomo:/var/majordomo:/bin/sh The group should be `majordom', not `majordomo'. All else aside, the correct passwd line is: majordom:*:uid:gid::/usr/lib/majordomo:/bin/sh There should be no such directory as /var/majordomo; it certainly doesn't appear in

Bug#4307: telnet and 256+ character pastes

1996-08-27 Thread Richard Kettlewell
: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersionDescription +++-===-==- ii ncurses3.0 1.9.9e-1 Video terminal manipulation: shared librarie -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#4308: ssh and 256+ character pastes

1996-08-27 Thread Richard Kettlewell
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersionDescription +++-===-==- ii zlib1 1.02-3 compression library - runtime chiark:richard$ -- Richard

Bug#4267: xosview doesn't understand -geometry very well

1996-08-25 Thread Richard Kettlewell
; and occasionally it even ends up in the right place. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4236: ftp(1) barfs on QUOTE command

1996-08-23 Thread Richard Kettlewell Richard Kettlewell
] is not allowed for service ftp on muskogee. 421 aftpd: aborted ftp (again, this serves to illustrate the point, even if it didn't actually work fully.) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4222: dig in the wrong package?

1996-08-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell Richard Kettlewell
Package: bind Version: 4.9.3-P1-3 `dig' really belongs in the `dnsutils' package, not the `bind' package; just because one is not running a local name server does not imply that one doens't want to use `dig' to look things up. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#4220: ghostview and /etc/papersize

1996-08-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
it should behave sensibly in the absence of /etc/papersize (or depend on a package which is known to provide it, though I think this is not as good an option). Secondly the postinst script ignores any errors that occur; it should include `set -e' so that errors are never ignored. -- Richard Kettlewell

Bug#4231: acct(2) man page refers to nonexistent acct(5) man page

1996-08-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: manpages Version: 1.11-4 According to `man 2 acct': SEE ALSO acct(5) But: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ man 5 acct No manual entry for acct in section 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: fhs

1996-08-17 Thread Richard Kettlewell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: echo $HOME/Mailbox $HOME/.forward Richard Kettlewell: This is a bad idea if the home directory is NFS-mounted from a remote system; IME file locking under NFS is very easy to get wrong. (Not that all mailers get locking right even on local file systems

Re: fhs

1996-08-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
...) Additionally, a system might well have different backup or quota policies for mail and ordinary user data, which is a good reason to keep them separate. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#4057: compress package install additional zcat

1996-08-07 Thread Richard Kettlewell
and is free. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: Bug#2059: dpkg and depend on versions

1996-01-05 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Ian Jackson wrote: Note that means less-than-or-equal-to in this context. Could dpkg also support using = for this meaning please? (Or does it already?) Having to write to mean = is far from optimal; I think it's something we should aim to get away from at some point. -- Richard Kettlewell

Re: file naming convention for debian package files (was: Re: dselect FTP method ...)

1996-01-05 Thread Richard Kettlewell
is a good indicator of Debian specific packages anyway. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#2091: creating packages requires root privileges

1996-01-04 Thread Richard Kettlewell
, so there may be gotchas I'm missing. A tool which could adjust permissions and ownership of the contents of a tar file shouldn't be hard to write; you'd still have to get the tar file back into the deb archive, of course. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff

Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head

1995-12-19 Thread Richard Kettlewell
However: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ ls -l | head -1 total 19792 Broken pipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ Bill Mitchell writes: PACKAGE: dpkg VERSION: 1.0.7 Script started on Mon Dec 18 21:19:37 1995 root:work# dpkg --info less*deb | head -1 old debian package, version 0.939000. Broken pipe

Re: Debian+umsdos (fwd)

1995-12-19 Thread Richard Kettlewell
be a good thing if we could support Debian entirely over UMSDOS - being able to run Linux without having to mess around repartitioning hard discs is going to make a lot of people a lot more willing to try it. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#2043: genksyms

1995-12-18 Thread Richard Kettlewell
environment variable was invented for a good reason... -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: More ncurses...

1995-12-18 Thread Richard Kettlewell
actually be dynamically loaded are therefore not drag libncurses into perl unless you actually used it, but it's so wonderful I think it deserves a mention l-) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: Debian+umsdos (fwd)

1995-12-18 Thread Richard Kettlewell
-- these will prevent the directory from being removed until the directory has been cleaned up (e.g. mount it as an msdos file system, then use rm -rf). -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: coming soon

1995-12-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
-only root. You can't change run-levels if you can't write this file. Isn't it just as likely that /var/log will be on a mounted filesystem? (In fact /var is a separate filesystem on mine.) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: coming soon

1995-12-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
I can make symbolic links in /etc/rc.d that point back out to where the directories are instead of moving the directories. I was of the impression that real SysV worked the other way, but I can satisfy everyone. I agree with Ian. Pleas don't do this. Adding alternative paths to the same

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-11 Thread Richard Kettlewell
the name of the symlink from not-released-1.0 to release-1.0, while the actual directory would be the same. This seems to be one of the more important things. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
software. This idea went down quite well when discussed off-line last night - what does anyone else think? -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
actually be any effort to do so - just hard to do by accident. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
comments about this remain as above. My suggestion provides the required functionality without creating `hidden' directories. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: dselect user interface (was Re: Bug#1959: binutils desc should says its necessary for gcc)

1995-12-07 Thread Richard Kettlewell
the development tools' and such questions. But I think there may need to be a level between this and the current dselect as well. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Setting console font STILL broken

1995-12-06 Thread Richard Kettlewell
A friends system recently installed with Debian just booted in 80x50 and set the font incorrectly, resulting in an unreadable screen. (Only the top half of each character was displayed.) This bug has been reported at least twice before, and apparently has yet to be fixed. The fix is to edit

Bug#1929: aliasinclude and forwardinclude directors missing

1995-11-30 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: smail Version: 3.1.29.1-13 There are no aliasinclude and forwardinclude directors in Debian's smail. This stops one from doing mailing lists. /usr/doc/smail-admin-guide/* provides examples. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#1900: tcl.h in funny location

1995-11-26 Thread Richard Kettlewell
/default.h /usr/include/tcl/ks_names.h tclX /usr/include /usr/include/tcl /usr/include/tcl/tclExtend.h /usr/include/tcl/tcl++.h (tcl=7.3-4; tk=3.6-4; tclX=7.3b-5; all a.out versions) -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: antisocial X11 apps: xtet42, chimera

1995-11-23 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Andrew Howell writes: Bill Mitchell writes: Dx -- dunno. Didn't take note when I had it open. I grepped /var/log/messages for a bogomips figure, but that's apparently no longer part of the startup. As I recall under earlier kernels, it was low -- perhaps 6.something. Better than the 386 I

Bug#1881: Majordomo UID wrong?

1995-11-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
J. last night and there's a possibility it's a bug (or at least an infelicity ;-) in dpkg. Majordomo 1.93-2 will (a) get it right and (b) should fix any broken installation of 1.93-1 that may be around. I should get around to uploading it this evening or tomorrow. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL

Re: Bug#1881: Majordomo UID wrong?

1995-11-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
that Majordomo use the same uid/gid on every machine. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#1881: Majordomo UID wrong?

1995-11-22 Thread Richard Kettlewell
, which is what chooses the uid/gid pair, not Majordomo. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#1878: bind doesn't purge named.boot

1995-11-21 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: bind Version: 4.9.3-BETA24-1 The postrm script doesn't remove the named.boot file when you run dpkg --purge on the package. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#1656: etc/ntp.dFrom @mongo.pixar.com:debian-devel-request@Pixar.com Tue Nov 21 23:34:18 1995

1995-11-21 Thread Richard Kettlewell
? What is the gid of the majordom group on your system? This needs some experimentation. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Re: Bug#1834: [kubla@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de: /etc/profile on Debian Linux]

1995-11-13 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Steve Greenland writes: [/etc/profile suggestion] if [ -f $HOME/$ARCH-linux ]; then PATH=$HOME/$ARCH-linux:$PATH else mkdir $HOME/bin 2/dev/null PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH fi I don't think /etc/profile should be creating directories in my home directory. Agree. They should

Bug#1806: genksyms misplaced?

1995-11-06 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Bill Hogan writes: Packages: devel/source, base/modules Versions? Problem: base/modules installs genksyms as `/usr/bin/genksyms', kernel Makefile[?] looks for `/sbin/genksyms'. Wasn't this reported ages ago? I can't find anything in the bug report logs, however. genksyms ought to

Re: inverse of `adduser'?

1995-10-25 Thread Richard Kettlewell
* what if the user has processes running? Or a print job queued? Or mail queued? Life is too short to worry about this. Actually I should have written `kill any processes the user owns' without opening that point to discussion since leaving them running has

Re: inverse of `adduser'?

1995-10-25 Thread Richard Kettlewell
. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/

Bug#1532: no revision number with repair

1995-10-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
information about the package rather than make assumptions about the format of internal databases; I'll check that it looks for the right field name tonight. There are one or two other things that need to be resolved before I upload it. Thanks for taking the time to have a look at it! -- Richard