Quoting Kyle McMartin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> > Too late :/
> >
> Has kernel-patch-int been adopted? As one of the upstream authors I
> would be glad to take it over.
I have agreed with Ivo ([EMAIL PRO
Quoting Thorsten Sauter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > libphp-adodb (a php database abstraction layer, required for 'acidlab')
>
> I'll like to adopte the libphp-adodb package from you.
Too late :/
Greets,
Robert
--
( o> Linux Generation
pgp
Quoting Mako Hill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > razor ('needed' by spamasassin; needs updating)
>
> I've check out the bug list and the package and I'd like to take this
> on unless some more qualified wants it.
Taken - sorry ! :)
Greets,
Robert
--
( o> Linux
Quoting Ivo Timmermans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I would like to take over your ITP for cryptoapi. If noone else wants
> it, I can take kernel-patch-int too.
As discussed yesterday night; they're yours.
Greets,
Robert
--
( o> Linux Generation
Quoting Peter Palfrader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Please retitle them to RFP (request for package) rather than closing
> them if you still think they'ld make a worthwhile addition to Debian.
Thanks, good point :)
Greets,
Robert
--
( o> Linux Generation
Hi,
I'm going to orphan most of my packages. Before I upload them with
Maintainer: set to QA, i'd like people to look at them and see if they want
anything :)
Some of the - less intensive - packages I'm keeping, the others I can't keep
on maintaining due to several reasons (bought a house, plan to
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > Is there any way of keeping razor out of woody until spamassassin 2.2 can be
> > uploaded? (I could file an RC bug, but is there a better solution?)
>
> You could simply make spamassassin conflict with the razor it doesn't
> work
Quoting Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So, since you neglected to supply the version numbers of the faulty
> packages, I am unsure whether you're referring to an upload that didn't
> make it into Sid today, or to razor 1.20-1. Should we all downgrade to
> razor 1.19-1, or is that one okay? (
Quoting Robert van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Please don't upgrade spamasassin/razor today, as it, ehm, doesn't work.
Damn. Ok. I don't know how to use a mailer. Sorry for the reply in the
thread, I intended to post a *new* message. I'll get some sleep now.
Hi,
Please don't upgrade spamasassin/razor today, as it, ehm, doesn't work. I
made a boo-boo in yesterday's upload, which basically f*cks it up. A new
upload will follow later today, adressing these issues. I'm posting this
here as the tendency is growing to blindly file bugs, without looking at t
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Xdm doesn't work, but that's the only breakage I've run into.
I'm taking a pretty wild guess that you need X because of a bright shiny new
card that's only supported by 4.2 ? I ran into the same problem with a new
radeon card, and solved it the same, with
Quoting Jerome Petazzoni ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'll consolidate this opinion : last time I really NEEDED dsniff's arpspoof,
> it did not work. I don't know why ; maybe it was because my host had many
> eth. interfaces, some of them with "redundant" routes and other crap ; but
> arpspoof died imme
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a
> > fever."
> where's that from?
'dead flag blues', by Godspeed you black emperor!
Greets,
Robert
--
Linux Generation
encrypted mail preferre
Quoting Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Try this:
> > apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> > # actually necessary
> What does that do? The description for the purity package is
> quite useless.
'purity tests' :)
Greets,
Hi,
Quoting Norbert Veber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> purity list
> purity nerd # any test should do from the previous
> # list
> Either finish the test, or abort it via ctrl-c or t
Hi,
Quoting Paul Slootman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> There's some problem there... Apparently libusb1 was removed a couple of
> weeks ago.
> > PS: Please send copies to me and not to the list, in order to not clobber
> > it (I'm not subscribed so keep that in mind)
> To the list anyway to prevent ot
Hi,
Quoting Guus Sliepen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker)
> wrote:
> > |Sep 10 11:54:05 replicator kernel: reiserfs_add_entry: Congratulations!
> > |we have got hash function screwed up
> Really, this is a clear indication that r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
http://cryptoapi.sourceforge.net/
|This is a repackaged distribution of the international crypto patch,
|with the aim to improve adoption of this package by not requiring to
|patch the kernel in order to be able to use the cryptoapi and the loop
|encrytion.
|
|Li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/loop-AES-v1.4d.tar.bz2
>From the readme:
"This package provides loadable Linux kernel module (loop.o) that has AES
cipher built-in. The AES cipher can be used to encrypt local file systems
and disk partitions."
Before you ask about
Hi,
Quoting Matthias Berse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> No, I mean a way to go from let's say kernel-source-2.4.3 to
> kernel-source-2.4.4 without the need to download the whole big .deb,
> but a patch similar to those patches found on kernel.org, but as a
> debian package which the patches the installe
Quoting Matthias Berse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> expand vanilla-debian kernels for let's say xfs. Since the
> kernel-source package is rather large compared to the usual
> kernel-to-kernel patch why do not provide a kernel-patch packet which
> can patch the kernel up do date?
I think you're either
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm adopting libapache-mod-ssl. I have spoken with the current maintainer (
Miquel van Smoorenburg, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), and he knows about/agrees on
this.
Thanks,
Robert
--
Linux Generation
encrypted mail preferred. finge
Hi,
Quoting Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here's a bug closing message with two bugs in it. First, the closes are done
> with 'close nnn' command which is not nice to the submitters, and second,
> the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces.
These were NMU-fixed bugs with a 'fixed' tag that weren't
Hi,
Quoting Christian Hammers (ch@westend.com):
> My snort package needs some work, e.g. a better logfile output and the
> ability to generate customised filters from the snort.org web page. Sadly
> I'm currently more interested in other things so maybe one of you want's
> to improve it. If some
Hi,
Quoting J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For me, 2.4 currently lacks
;)
> - kerneli crypto patches
There are preliminary 2.4 kerneli patches available. I will start packaging
those as soon as i have the 2.2.18 version cleaned up and up-to-date.
Greets,
Robert
--
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> My little playback program performs better (even though it is written in
> perl), because it takes the latency of a system call into consideration:
Where can we find it ? :)
Greets,
Robert
--
Linux Generation
Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their
> licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it.
I wouldn't mind doing it - i'm going to do kernel-patch-int, and openwall
fits in nicely..
Greets,
Quoting John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You going to send them the bill then? At the bottom off the mailinglist
> subscription page:
> I think that you have some volunteers to send dunning notices within this
> thread (myself included). If you already are, could you post a summary of
> your act
Quoting Carl B. Constantine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Now maybe if we were using the RBL, DUL, and RSS lists...
> > :-)
> >
> disallow spammers
> allow posts from outside those subscribed
We already allow spammers:
The Debian Linux mailing lists accept commercial advertising for payment.
We off
Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> BTW, I'm on a 28.8, and I get over 1000 emails a day from all the lists I
> am sub'd to. So I do see a lot of spam, even beyond Debian's lists. If I
> can ignore it, so can everyone else, IMNHO.
Ignoring spam has made the internet the spam-ridden place it
SING stands for 'Send ICMP Nasty Garbage'. It is a tool that sends ICMP
packets fully customized from command line. Its main purpose is to replace
the ping command but adding certain enhancements (Fragmentation,
spoofing,...)
Sing is released under the GNU public license. It's project page is at
Quoting Dale Scheetz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Since my last upgrade to potato I've been getting a lot of messages like
> the following:
> There doesn't seem to be any real information here. Can anyone tell me
> what is triggering these messages?
They're postgres debug messages.
Somehow, the newest
Hi,
I don't like crossposting to mailinglists, so i post this to debian-devel,
as well as a Cc to the original author.
Quoting Juhapekka Tolvanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Have you guys and girls seen this? What do you think about it?
>
> http://www.securityportal.com/closet/
>
> Before you flame
33 matches
Mail list logo
