On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:09:40PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
(culled cc list of a few people I know read -devel)
Roger Leigh wrote:
Given the need to consider unlocking as well as locking, I'm not sure
it's worth adding special support to deluser: the typical logic used
to create
maintainers
pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
initscripts - scripts for initializing and shutting down the system
sysv-rc- System-V-like runlevel change mechanism
sysvinit - System-V-like init utilities
sysvinit-utils - System-V-like
Maintainer: Debian buildd-tools Developers
buildd-tools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
dchroot- Execute commands in a chroot environment
dchroot-dsa - Execute commands in a chroot environment
libsbuild-dev - development files for the Debian
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:28:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/RunDirectory
With the upload of initramfs-tools (0.99) to unstable, we're now
ready to upload sysvinit 2.88dsf-13.6 to unstable
The upload has been done and you should find yourself with a /run
maintainers
pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
initscripts - scripts for initializing and shutting down the system
sysv-rc- System-V-like runlevel change mechanism
sysvinit - System-V-like init utilities
sysvinit-utils - System-V-like
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:40:13PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:23:10AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi folks,
An update on /run:
sysvinit/initscripts 2.88dsf-13.4 is now available in experimental.
If you haven't tested it yet, now would be a good time before
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Friday 13 May 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:40:13PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:23:10AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
[...]
With the upload of initramfs-tools (0.99
and read_fstab
in /lib/init/mount-functions.sh.
If it's not working for you, then it's possible that the fstab entry
for / doesn't match. Might be worth sourcing and running read_fstab
by hand to see if it's pulling out the options correctly.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU
--it'll just take a bit of careful planning
so all the bits fall into place in the correct order.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public
to using their tool-of-choice for making changes.
Other than this usage, writing to /etc is bad practice. IMO it should
be considered RC buggy for wheezy, and banned outright--it's
fundamentally incompatible with a r/o rootfs.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
fstab to be applied to the root mount.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105041116.26614.hol...@layer-acht.org
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org
resource
usage, I'll be happy to add them to the sbuild summary stats. Actually
measuring those might be a bit trickier though, especially on machines
running parallel builds.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh
to work sensibly by default, and fix up the client code
relying on the assumptions made by the library so that they can be
removed and/or made non-default.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux
on the command-line. This
mechanism might be a somewhat simpler and more flexible alternative to
99builddsourceslist for the general case as well.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
libgcrypt has some horrendous bugs which upstream refuse to fix,
for example the broken behaviour relating to setuid binaries
discussed previously here, and the hard coded behaviour
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:23:10AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi folks,
An update on /run:
sysvinit/initscripts 2.88dsf-13.4 is now available in experimental.
If you haven't tested it yet, now would be a good time before it
goes into unstable. Additionally, if you wish to transition your
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:10:27PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Roger Leigh]
This also permits the mount options for filesystems mounted in the
initramfs (e.g. /dev, /run, /sys, /proc etc.) to be set in
/etc/fstab; the filesystems are remounted with the options from
/etc/fstab
maintainers
pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
initscripts - scripts for initializing and shutting down the system
sysv-rc- System-V-like runlevel change mechanism
sysvinit - System-V-like init utilities
sysvinit-utils - System-V
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:44:55AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Edward Allcutt edw...@allcutt.me.uk writes:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 05:58:19PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
I suggest:
- on upgrade, bind mount or symlink /run/init - /lib/init
, and this results in a partially functional udev.
Note that for the networking, an ifdown and ifup of the device does
work around the issue. For other devices, probably just a modprobe.
If there's anyone familiar with udev who could take a look at it, I'd
be very grateful.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:35:53AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
If it wasn't already clear, having /tmp as a tmpfs
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:58:58PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:59:01PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
{ find var/run/ ! -type d -print0; \
find var
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
maintainers
pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
initscripts - scripts for initializing and shutting down the system
sysv-rc- System-V-like runlevel change mechanism
sysvinit - System-V-like init utilities
sysvinit-utils - System-V
maintainers
pkg-sysvinit-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
initscripts - scripts for initializing and shutting down the system
sysv-rc- System-V-like runlevel change mechanism
sysvinit - System-V-like init utilities
sysvinit-utils - System-V
to func‐
tion.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
]] Julien Cristau
| On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
|
| Given that Fedora
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:55:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:19:38PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I think this should be fixed now; could you possibly try again
(you'll need a clean vserver environment that hasn't been upgraded
before). The updated packages
. Could you
rephrase it more clearly?
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:38:34PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
This I really don't get. There was no error reported, and we're using
this logic:
if [ ! -L /var/run ] [ -d /var/run ]; then
echo guest environment detected: Migrating /var/run
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:39:40PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:28:35PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:07:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/run/sysvinit_2.88dsf-13.3.dsc
Changes since last time
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
If it wasn't already clear, having /tmp as a tmpfs is a
/configurable option/, and it is /not/ the default (except when
root is read-only (ro) in fstab).
I hope you check
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:26:59PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:38:34PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
Your assumption is correct in that this is a fallback. This is the
special case for chroots, also co-opted for vservers
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:59:01PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
{ find var/run/ ! -type d -print0; \
find var/lock/ ! -type d -print0; } | xargs -0r $_CHROOT_SH rm
I'm afraid this will need fixing in util-vserver(?) though. We
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:32:42 +0100
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Following
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:15:07 +0100, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I have now implemented this (though it's
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:29:16AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
One reason for doing this is to have a single writable mount on the
system, which might be useful for tiny systems with minimal resources,
where root is r/o. On such a system
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:01:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
With the transition to /run and /run/lock as tmpfs filesystems, it
would be desirable to provide sensible default size limits. Currently,
we default to the tmpfs
options are visible to the
admin.
So other than choosing sensible defaults for /etc/default/rcS and
/etc/default/tmpfs, I think this is ready to be deployed.
Many thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
I would very much appreciate it if anyone could take the time to
install the new initscripts and test
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:35:24PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:24:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I have now implemented this (though it's
, but they may well not be
optimal, and I'll be happy to adjust them as needed.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
I would very much appreciate it if anyone could take the time to
install the new initscripts and test
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:01:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
With the transition to /run and /run/lock as tmpfs filesystems, it
would be desirable to provide sensible default size limits. Currently,
we default to the tmpfs default of ½ RAM. But with several tmpfs
filesystems, this does have
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:01:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
With the transition to /run and /run/lock as tmpfs filesystems, it
would be desirable to provide sensible default size limits. Currently,
we default to the tmpfs
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:12:21PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Hi there!
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:38:03 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote:
Josh Triplett suggested that we could use a single tmpfs on /run and
have the rest as symlinks into /run, with potentially a separate
tmpfs for user-writable
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:44:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:01:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
With the transition to /run and /run/lock as tmpfs filesystems, it
would be desirable to provide
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:07:48PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:47:35PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
With the patch as it stands at present, RAMRUN is deprecated. /run
is always a tmpfs; RUN_SIZE will set its size, as before.
Hmm, just thinking... vServers don't
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:19:59PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:44:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
If the problem is that multiple tmpfs are mounted and
each can expand to half-of-RAM, either reduce the number of tmpfses
presented (as discussed), or limit
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:08:30PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Roger Leigh
| I think that if we have /run/lock, /run/shm makes sense (how different
| are locks and POSIX semaphores? They are just a different type of
| lock (broadly). And shared memory is ephemeral state, just like
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:22:00PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2011-04-12, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
Having multiple tmpfses with the kernel defaults means that a user or
badly written program could intentionally or accidentally lock up the
machine by using all available
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:35:37PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Hi there!
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:47:35 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:12:21PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:38:03 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote:
Josh Triplett suggested that we could use
services etc.) for context.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
for a
few days longer until initscripts is uploaded!
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:54:53AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm just mentioning this here because udev started to use /run before
we had completed our work, and without a versioned dependency, causing
breakage. If you are planning on using /run, please hold fire for a
few days longer until
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:59:51PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
What do others think of moving
...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb
libsbuild-perl - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources
sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary packages
,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
1) /etc/init.d/mountall.sh is broken for some reason. The mount -a
invocation fails. Not because it fails
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:59:43PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
Both of these issues were due to /etc/mtab being inconsistent with
reality. I've now corrected the code to make domtab() behave
identically to domount() to ensure
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
]] Julien Cristau
| On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
|
| Given that Fedora
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
]] Julien Cristau
| On Wed, Mar 30, 2011
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:06:16PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Hi there!
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:33:44 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote:
Patches filed against base-files and initscripts in #620157 and #620191.
Test packages here: http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/run/
(tested in an amd64 kvm VM
be until after /var is mounted. Can't dynamically added
entried be added to /var/lib/wrap/hosts.* (for example) and then
libwrap can be patched to read both locations, allowing for static
configuration in /etc, and dynamic added/removed under /var.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing
/run in Debian?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/146976
https://lwn.net/Articles/436012/
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:39:13PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Julien Cristau
| On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
|
| Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
| we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing
| /run
in
packages which are installable on old-style split systems, e.g.
when generating shlibs files etc.
I'm sure I'll have more to come!
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
]] Julien Cristau
| On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
|
| Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
| we have wanted
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:39:30PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Roger Leigh]
As a followup, I would like to get the UTF-8 codeset and collation
hardcoded in libc6 directly and sharable by all UTF-8 locales to
reduce startup time and needless duplication
Collation is not just
also have a use of binary-all dist in sbuild-db (an experimental
wanna-build replacement using PostgreSQL 9.0), just for the record.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http
-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb
libsbuild-perl - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources
sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary packages
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:31:13AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
just as a reminder:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net (16/03/2011):
OK. I think this is the only known discrepancy between the two
resolvers. Given that we now routinely build using minimal clean
(cloned) chroots
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:07:19AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:42:32PM -0600, Raphael
-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb
libsbuild-perl - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources
sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary packages
Maintainer: Debian buildd-tools Developers
buildd-tools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
dchroot- Execute commands in a chroot environment
dchroot-dsa - Execute commands in a chroot environment
libsbuild-dev - development files for the Debian
people have it installed, and 10 have ever used it. Would
migrating to wanna-build.git be realistic for these users?
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 05:24:25PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello Roger,
2011/3/10 Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net:
This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the
wanna-build package in the archive? popcon indicates that a few
people have it installed, and 10
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. Rewriting them to get them
included in devscripts is too much work without benefit. devscripts
would depend on python then.
Most of the scripts are short. Rewriting would be fairly simple, and
may be beneficial in removing the Ubuntu-specific bits.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
snapshots.
It would be great if there was a solution to this problem; is anyone
running Btrfs as a root filesystem who has any suggestions?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:42:32PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I disagree here.
Alternatives in build-* relationships *are* mentioned by policy. In fact
Maintainer: Debian buildd-tools Developers
buildd-tools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
dchroot- Execute commands in a chroot environment
dchroot-dsa - Execute commands in a chroot environment
libsbuild-dev - development files for the Debian
with the CGI scripts, but I /think/ that one is an
older version. These two do show me the current version:
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=insighttoolkit
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=insighttoolkitsuite=sid
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45:06AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:40:52PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
From discussion on IRC earlier this evening, it looks like the most
pragmatic approach will be to get the apt and aptitude sbuild
resolvers to strip the alternatives
much so. This is why library transitions need coordination,
since they have distribution-wide impact. This is also a good
example of why we should aim to only have one major version of each
library in use at one time.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
-tools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Description:
buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb
libsbuild-perl - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources
sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:42:32PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hi everyone, Roger,
Roger Leigh has filed a few bug reports related to how the buildd's resolver
(either internal or any of the new ones: apt{,itude}) and I'm not sure I
quiet agree.
Let's take for example the one filed
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:21:17PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Roger Leigh writes (Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps):
Taking one of php5's dependencies as an example:
libdb-dev (= 4.7) | libdb4.8-dev | libdb4.6-dev
This dependency permits building against no less than
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:13:19PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:08:18 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
· Standard alternative use in the form concrete|virtual, as used for
normal deps on virtual packages. Is this sensible?
· Architecture-specific dependencies
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:21:24PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:49:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Roger Leigh writes (Re: re buildd's resolver and package's build deps):
I agree that these do serve a useful purpose for these uses, and that
ease of reuse
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:05:28AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 22:40:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
From discussion on IRC earlier this evening, it looks like the most
pragmatic approach will be to get the apt and aptitude sbuild
resolvers to strip the alternatives
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:36:55PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
sbuild, which does the job of building binary packages on our buildds,
uses a built-in build-dependency resolver (internal) to work out
what packages need installing/removing in order to satisfy a package's
Build-Depends and Build
wish to do this. I already puts no entry emblems
on folders you don't have permission to enter, so it's not a big
change to additionally flag up folders which other have read and write
access to.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org
well want total control
over who can see your files, but unless you're dealing with TOP SECRET
stuff, I am not convinced that this is something the typical user would
wish to have by default. Are there any common use cases which require
this?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian
/rleigh/public_html
# owner: rleigh
# group: rleigh
user::rwx
group::r-x
group:www-data:r-x
mask::r-x
other::r-x
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net
301 - 400 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo
