t at
the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may
be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for
this one yet.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
hers
do their work for them, and unmaintained and buggy packages lower the
quality of the distribution.
I don't know if you read my other mail, but I do find it hard to
cooperate with Ubuntu for my own package, because each time it has
been uploaded to Ubuntu it was done my a different person
an exception. When I
check my own I see that each upload has been by a different person
almost every time, which makes it difficult to firstly know who I
should contact, and secondly I have doubts about their familiarity
with the package if there's no one who really cares for it.
Regards
g to solve?
If the partition table is being changed, the tool that changed it
should issue a BLKRRPART ioctl, like fdisk does for example (see
).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Li
even mention bug submitters in the Debian changelog,
as a way of thanking them for the time they took to identify and
investigate a bug. I treat both fellow developers and non-developers
the same in this respect.
Realistically, what more can we do?
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger
in favor of debhelper.
> However, it's not a bug to use debmake.
> ---
> I should remove last sentence from all translations.
It might be better changing it to "It is a bug to use debmake in new
packages. New packages using debmake will be rejected from the
archive."
Re
eady created, it's no
longer useful; this will not preclude it being installed by hand on
systems with a static /dev.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
base/standard/optional/extra) policy would be
simpler to understand and make use of.
The fact of being group-maintained /should/ make it simpler for
third-party changes to get into a package anyway (since there are more
maintainers to review and commit changes). This should lessen the
need for 0-da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ke, 2005-12-21 kello 10:28 +0000, Roger Leigh kirjoitti:
>> For this task, you might find schroot(1) useful. It's a means of
>> accessing chroot environments, but it sup
d this to sbuild.
[schroot has received some minor criticism for being written in C
using GLib/GObject. I have however spent the last week converting it
to C++, and I'm just finishing that up now.]
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourc
t;
> That's why I'd like to have a check for /run (or /lib/run or whatever)
> being empty at the end of the boot process, and complain if it isn't
> (possibly also remounting it r/o so abusers break noisily).
Wouldn't that break mtab, or will that be mov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any other defenders of /lib/run? Of /run?
I prefer /run. It certainly doesn't belong in /lib (IMO).
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 19, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> With this example, it's trivial to trigger namespace conflicts and
>> break shm_open(). "mkdir /dev/shm/foobar
ehind their back.
3) Cause the program abusing /dev/shm to fail as its datafiles are
trashed and/or unlinked behind their back.
Namespace conflicts aren't pretty. Sure, you can call it
"handwaving", but to me it's something that's going to break at some
point in the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 19, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
>> >> for shm_open(), then it has no rea
But it has no reason to go away either, since there are many other uses
> too for a tmpfs.
There are many uses for an ext3fs, but that doesn't mean we only have
one ext3 filesystem. What exactly is your reasoning here?
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/L
ntal, if anyone wants to test them.
I did file a bug about tmpfs size limits (#344001), but this is really
a wishlist item.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
[no need to CC me; I'm subscribed to the list]
> On Dec 18, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Debian guarantees that it exists on debian systems.
>> But wha
lso, if and when it's added to the FHS.
>> Sounds it sounds to me like it is a bad idea to use it.
> Only because you have no clue of what you are talking about.
On the contrary, he made several good points, which you would do well
to fully consider before dismissin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 18, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How strongly can I put this? /dev/shm is for *shared memory*, not for
>> random junk. /dev/shm is for POSIX shared memory
ever written down that any package could use /dev/shm?
They can't.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:01:52AM +0000, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The
el of indentation required.
Specifically regarding bullets: We now have UTF-8 encoded control
files, so why not simply use the UCS bullet character (U+2022)?
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/
he differences as much as possible. Perl being Perl, so
far all the merging has been by hand, and going through the remaining
huge diff by hand will take some time.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:02:36AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is pro
age (buildd-tools CVS).
BTW, are there any good reasons why the autobuilders don't use the
packaged version anywat? The differences are minimal.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian
rd to use and not supported by the infrastructure or by policy.
ACK. I certainly care about security, and I'll sign my packages just
as soon as debsign supports it.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian
filed against them, which
should be upgraded to serious as soon as this is fully mandated by
Policy (what happened to the proposal for that we discussed last year?
I don't recall any objections).
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print
. Anything not
falling within the scope of the DFSG is not of any interest.
Your many (somewhat confused) posts seem to be asking us to be doing a
lot of relicensing *for you*, but quite what we gain is not clear.
Working on proprietary software is not what we do.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roge
nly compiled for i386. O:-)
Built and uploaded to experimental for powerpc.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign
res these lintian warnings as one knows it
>> comes from the upstream tarball.
>
> I'd rather not have warnings that must be ignored 99.9% of the time.
You could add a lintian override.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourcef
ase for CUPS, but is now fixed upstream. See
http://www.cups.org/str.php?L989+P0+S1+C0+I0+E0+Qrleigh.debian
The sad thing is, this is special cased primarily because of broken
/etc/hosts files preventing reverse name lookups...
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Notice that the /etc/schroot/setup.d/30passwd was used to sync the
>> passwd and related files by copying them into the chroot f
mount block devices on demand, and
(later tonight, once I write it) create, mount and destroy LVM
snapshots on the fly.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh:
>
>> We can't provide proper security support, and by now, libc5 is likely
>> full of holes, so IMO it's best if we drop it. It's not like there's
>> any active maintenance or w
com/pub/contrib/libc5/i386/
libc5 hasn't been updated since 1998, and dependent packages mostly
not since 97-98, with some in 99 and 2 in 00.
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/i386/SRPMS/
No trace.
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/current/suse/i586/
No trace.
- From w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Some packages chose to place random junk in there (e.g. resolvcon
is from
> oops_1.5.19.cvs.20010818-0.1woody1_ia64.changes 20-May-2005 04:32
You could upload a .commands file. See the README in incoming.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.or
han
abusing a location intended for a specific, unrelated, use.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encryp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I often do "debuild -us -uc -nc" outside the chroot till i get the
> package to build and then build just source and dum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 05:04:57PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Not a kernel feature, but see
>> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/schroot
>
> Does not help, each chroo
random breakage.
> If users can make the changes they want, than Debian is NOT free.
I think you got that backwards ;-)
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
can start with a clean
environment for each build, and at the end, you just throw away the
snapshot.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
--
To
res and regressions over the last year while porting
for amd64. The fact that many maintainers have not yet applied, or at
least carefully reviewed and applied amended patches, is a pity.
As the bug lists at http://bts.turmzimmer.net show, most of the RC
bugs currently have patches. Grab yours toda
It just needs
to run 'sbuild -A'.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP
n account isn't that essential. I had packages in Debian for
at least a year before I was invited to join the project. The
additional 11 months I waited in the NM queue didn't stop me doing
useful work.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sour
nterested in either
should get in touch.
I would also highly recommend any maintainers of printing or
printing-related packages to subscribe to debian-printing.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> gimp-print (renamed to gutenprint) is near its 5.0 release. I've
>> uploaded a prerelease to experimental, which is a
font is now less good.
I also get screen corruption with the Radeon driver:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/Screenshot.png
Galeon is also similarly afflicted. It's either a GTK+ bug, or a
Radeon bug (ati driver).
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? h
> versions should be shipped or dropped.
We even have GCC 2.7.2 in unstable (gcc272). Does anyone actually use
this anymore, or could it be removed for etch?
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhtt
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Rob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 11:27 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
>> >> At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
>> &g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 11:27 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
>> At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
>> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > This mail is just to test the water to see if there is
ur reproduction, usability, integration with other
packages etc. will also be very helpful.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB84
iously ...
>
> So is debian "business apps only" now?
No, but it doesn't hurt to exercise restraint before packaging every
tiny utility out there. Debian is already too big.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforg
gt;
> I guess the tools aren't capable of this, but AFAIK you could just do
> (manually) something like /usr/i386/bin and /usr/ppc/bin
The whole cpu-manfr-opsys triplet would be better.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
drivers in the
mail. Please CC any other maintainers you feel might be interested.]
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB8
sed, is it OK to use newer tar formats?
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Upstream Author : Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot/
> * License : GPL
> The above URL is temporary. It should
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: schroot
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot/
* License : GPL
Description
ing.
Comments welcome!
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> That's true, but for the majority of code, which just uses existing
>> GtkObjects, conversion is no much more involved than
>>
ut for the majority of code, which just uses existing
GtkObjects, conversion is no much more involved than
search-and-replace. Plus, if you don't bother with the full
conversion, there's quite a lot of compatibility functions to make
things easier.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 23.32, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 23:02, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> >> Exi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Jun 08, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Wrong. The problem is packages which need to interact with text files,
>> > mail and usenet messages generate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:28:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Eh? You can't change that around just like that, it will b
ocales were UTF-8 by
default. We should have done this long before sarge was released.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 23:02, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Existing installs are already configured with debconf. Their
>> /etc/locale.gen will not be touched.
>>
>> If you do dpk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh
>
> | - When UTF-8 is the default locale, it shouldn't need a .UTF-8 suffix,
> | e.g. en_GB will be UTF-8, and en_GB.ISO-8859-1 will be Latin-1 (the
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 22:10, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> - When UTF-8 is the default locale, it shouldn't need a .UTF-8
>> suffix, e.g. en_GB will be UTF-8, and en_GB.ISO-8859-1 will be La
or sarge, I found that the
DocBook toolchain is quite broken WRT text encoding support. It
doesn't put the encoding in the generated HTML, which nowadays is not
acceptable. See gnupg-doc for examples.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http:/
t I personally would like to see ubuntu patches
filed directly as wishlist bugs against my packages, and wouldn't
consider it mass bug filing (they are mostly separate issues, to be
dealt with separately). The worst I can do is disagree with the
change and close it, but the norm would be reviewi
to the BTS at the time of the
> upload). One small step down that road, anyway.
I agree strongly with this. However, it's only fair to post the patch
to the BTS to give the maintainer a chance to respond before uploading
at all.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> The BTS does not currently support this. For example, if I upload a
>> fix to unstable, I have to manually
and certainly deserves serious
consideration.
The BTS does not currently support this. For example, if I upload a
fix to unstable, I have to manually reopen it and tag it sarge.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
>&
think that being fluent in english should be a
>> requirement to be treated nicely on a development list...
>
> I *could* have simply ignored him.
That would have been much better; please do so in the future. If you
don't have anything worthwhile to contribute,
tegorised junk into
one big festering sore: /usr/lib. Making it a little tidier by
categorising some of its contents slightly differently is not a bad
thing.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxh
rectories it is about
> creating a new one.
Not really; it's already in common use. However, all packages
committing the sin of using it have to be specially patched or
configured to remove the taint.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourcefo
nd would support using it in
Debian.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGI
ange it at this late stage.
Have you considered the huge impact of changing the version number?
It's to no-one's advantage to do this.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
n-admin/
If you haven't already, you might like to pick up the manpages I wrote
from here: http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/buildd/
I posted this to the buildd-disc list quite some time ago, but they
were never committed.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printi
appropriate place to
ask this sort of question.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Mar 26, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the
>> application of a simple patch to allow
y obstruct furthering the
integration of the system.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt
they were originally
created. This should also lower your packaging overheads, since you
won't have to re-patch for every new Debian revision.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debi
less as a "standard", since ANSI standardised
many different things. Perhaps you mean it implements ISO-6429
(ECMA-48) SGR control sequences, or maybe something entirely
different? Either way, it would help if you were much more specific.
(This applies equally to the other
gt; it. Really :)
I would certainly be interested. I may even be able to get
libgimpprint using it (instead of the customised form we have embedded
currently). I also have uses for it in other projects, where libxml2
is not suitable.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Prin
is a feasable goal for etch, as is recoding everything to UTF-8 (where
it makes sense).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Pl
t our users understand it.
I also agree with this, and think your proposal would be very useful.
I don't think the package in question furthers our production of a
free software operating system in any way.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
ot;my first shell script" or minor
variations on common programs. I'd like for the bar for new packages
to be set rather higher than it is at the moment, and if it doesn't
add any value over existing equivalents or have much general use it
doesn't get in.
Regards,
Roger
- --
def $(srcdir)/printers.xml
../printdef/printdef < $(srcdir)/printers.xml > print-printers.c
CLEANFILES = print-printers.c
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
nstallation and reinstall it
again to ensure it's working correctly--if you've done a lot of
tinkering, you'll start in a known good state.
If you can't get the basic Gimp-Print CUPS driver going as above,
please file a bug report against cupsys-driver-gimpprint.
Regards,
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [I am not subscribed to debian -bsd.]
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:30:48PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I'm not opposed to anything else you've said. I do
FÃanor that might also qualify.
However, there may well be copyright issues. "Slink", "Woody",
"Potato" and "Bo" etc. aren't exactly unique, but you would be hard
pushed to find another book with "ManwÃ", "OromÃ", etc. in it.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
name, or otherwise. Which to people of several religions are
> _not_ cute.
Thanks for raising this point. I'm very interested in the Debian
GNU/*BSD efforts, but if named as such I would never consider using
them (the BSD daemon is, to my mind, only borderline acceptable as it
is).
I&#x
limit, any user can kill the system by
creating a huge file in there. It's much nicer to get ENOSPC than a
kernel panic. The installer could pick a sensible limit based on, for
example, 20% of the combined core+swap size.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> In late 2001, I spent several weekends hand-building quite a large
>> chunk of woody (over 200 source packages). I found quite a number of
>> serious bug in several packages, inc
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> apt-fu installs binary packages of build-depends first to avoid circular
>> >> build-depen
t build unless the same version
was also installed (due to a shlibs problem requiring the just-built
library to be installed for shlibdeps to be computed).
This sort of automated source building is a very good idea--it will
root out a lot of build bugs, and will improve the quality of Deb
of operations, etc.
Further to that... would it be acceptable to upload the new stable
libpqxx release (2.0.0) built against 7.4 once 7.4 has entered
unstable. It would be fantastic to have the new libpqxx in sarge,
too.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-pri
601 - 700 of 715 matches
Mail list logo
