Re: Reducing the attack surface caused by Berkeley DB...

2018-01-25 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote: the vast majority of the ~170 reverse dependencies of libdb5.3 listed by `apt-cache rdepends libdb5.3` on sid will require (much) more work to get rid of that dependency, with impact on backwards compatibility... Among those packages

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

2015-11-12 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:08:04PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote: You can also find database in text files with a checksum so you cannot modify them by hand (I am looking at the cn=config slapd database here). In a future slapd revision I hope to move those to /var, as they are in practice inte

Re: RFC schema in package citadel

2015-07-08 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:19:30AM +, Brian May wrote: On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 at 20:50 Michael Meskes wrote: citadel always came with an LDAP schema file under openldap/rfc2739.schema that says: openldap comes with schemas that have similar licenses. If it is OK for openldap, I think it sho

Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies

2014-07-07 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote: > ==> openldap_2.4.39-1.arch-all.unusedbd <== > debconf-utils=1.5.53 I think that's valid. According to debian/changelog, that B-D was added long ago for debconf-mergetemplate, but if I'm reading correctly it seems to be unused since switchi

Re: ITP: schema2ldif -- Tool for converting OpenLDAP-style schemas to the LDIF

2014-07-06 Thread Ryan Tandy
On 06/07/14 04:03 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:58:28PM +0200, Benoit Mortier wrote: schema2ldif will read the given input file and convert it to an LDIF file that you can insert into you LDAP directory Did you talk to the openldap maintainers if they would be willing

Re: MATE 1.8 has now fully arrived in Debian

2014-06-06 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > GNOME flashback AFAIK is a Debian thing. For sure it is NOT part of > GNOME. We do have GNOME classic, but you already know that. I'm a bit > confused. GNOME Flashback has at least some upstream presence: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Gnome

Bug#661275: ITP: meh -- a simple, minimalist, super fast image viewer

2012-02-25 Thread Ryan Tandy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ryan Tandy * Package name: meh Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : John Hawthorn * URL : http://www.johnhawthorn.com/meh/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C Description : a simple, minimalist, super fast image