On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:55:57PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > For example, I think US drivers' licenses are only verifiable by
> > someone who's lived in that state or otherwise seen drivers'
> > licenses from that state.
>
> Nah; there's a guide pub
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:13:21PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Of course it does! Once the functionality is dropped, there is no way to
> continue working on the project without editing the C files. Developers
> cannot continue using the old version of glade (it doesn't support some
> of the stuf
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I’m pretty sure many of the list are in similar cases. Now loading the
> UI directly into the application is the standard, but not so long ago
> people generated template code with glade and then edited it by hand.
> The .glade fil
[Note that I'm not subscribed to either d-d or d-legal so if you want
to ask me something, the quickest way is to Cc: me]
Hi,
I grepped the source tarballs in Lenny (testing) main section for the
note "DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is generated by Glade." which
indicates the file is generated using
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 01:35:21AM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Of course I might be mistaken and there is a better solution, one that
> does not involve modifying or configuring every application,
> recompiling the kernel, or doing extreme things like deleting the
> module.
It has be
load blacklisted
modules anyway? Aren't they blacklisted so they won't load when
something tries to?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:15:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 30, Sami Liedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So the solution you propose is configure
Hi,
While browsing packages in aptitude, I ran into some packages that, to
me, seem to be in the wrong section (or at least it's not obvious why
they are in the section they are). Section: python seems to be
especially bad, I wonder if the rationale was just "it was written in
Python". These all a
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:11:05AM -0500, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a
> > sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on
> > numerous oldstable->stable upgrades, I thought something could be done
> >
[Please Cc: me in replies as I'm not on the list]
Hi,
I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a
sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on
numerous oldstable->stable upgrades, I thought something could be done
about it. Actually, most often oldstabl
9 matches
Mail list logo
