On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 10:50:01PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 03:30:41PM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> > > But that is not the reason why my first guess was non-free. It was
> > > the fact that mpg123 is in non-free, and x11amp is (according to
>
s (according to
> the docs) based on it.
I already have it packaged. It uses plugins for the decoder so I think
x11amp can go in contrib and libmpg123.so can be moved into x11amp-nonfree.
/---\
|Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [E
entry start a program in xterm? because spectremu
> for X11 must be started from xterm.
Just do it like any other thing "xterm -e someprog"
/----------\
|Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|
> potato's GNOME once I start releasing imlib package updates.
Huh? the new GNOME has been uploaded at about 2-3 days ago, it doesnt depend
on slink libs. Try a mirror that is not so out of date.
--
Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-* Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my public key. PGP#22714B25 *-
specs,
I would have used their website but it sucks.
--
Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-* Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my public key. PGP#22714B25 *-
Sorry to reply to myself but I left part of the license off.
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 08:22:08PM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> Copyright (c) 1994 by The XFree86 Project, Inc.
> Copyright (c) 1998 Red Hat Software, Inc.
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
OR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF
OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.
--
Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-* Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my public key. PGP#22714B25 *-
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Debian is a free project to distribute a free OS. It should have a free
> logo. FREE THE LOGO!! FREE THE LOGO!! :-)
And what if some anti-debian people get ahold of the logo and use it for
evil purposes?
--
Stephen C
wmsysmon.app doesn't mean the package has to be called that. The
manpage should always be the same as the binary. If you binary is named
wmsysmon then your manpage should be wmsysmon.1 not wmsysmon.app.1
--
Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-* Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my public key. PGP#22714B25 *-
2 hamm
> bma: um, dists/hamm/hamm/binary-i386/libs/libpng2_1.0.0-0.1.deb
>
> > what about latest gnome packages ? (0.99.3), is nobody packaging them ?
> Stephen Crowley (aka Crow-) is.
>
Well, I was going to...but then jpick said just to wait til he's ready with
them. Who kn
yway, since he seems to be reponsible for a large chunk of the programs
> concerned.
You need to link with -lgmodule
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
pgpx5P81cAFga.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 12:36:37PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Could you try the next prelimnary version?
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb
Great! This seems to fix it, no problems here.
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
>
> : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> : > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
> : > longe
Nope, same problems, cant su, cant telnet in.
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
pgpD1gxhbyDMg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I found out the problem is in sysklogd, not sure what is going on though.
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
pgp8zboM3TGbD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I
also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got
the exact same problem. What is going on!?
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> I've been considering packaging snes9x, and was just wondering whether it
> had already been done.
Yeah, they're done. the package names are snes9x-x, snes9x-svga and
snes9x-server
-- Stephen Crowley (Crow- on IRC)
-
lous, there is no reason to remove gnome before the freeze, if you
dont like it dont use it. There are several programs that wont run without it,
including GtkICQ which is about the only usuable icq replacement available (if
you dont count those crappy console ones)
-- Stephen Crowley (Crow- on IR
What is all this about? I just noticed snes9x, xmame, doom and quake
have been removed from non-free. Why?
-- Stephen Crowley (Crow- on IRC)
-- "Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy."
19 matches
Mail list logo