On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .greenend.org.uk, ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay
> =00:00:21, mailer=esmtp, pri=6332789, relay=chiark.greenend.org.uk.
> [195.224.76.132], dsn=4.2.0, st
Winfried Truemper writes:
> This error can be reproduced as follows:
> bash> bash> mount -t iso9660 -o loop=/dev/loop0 cd /mnt
Have you checked to make sure that this isn't a problem with the
loopback filesystem?
I will test mkisofs on a raw disk partition shortly; I can't do so
just yet becaus
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>I noticed that in the rex/source archive there is currently only the
>complete XFree-3.1.2 source tree. Are there any means to get ahold of
>just the Debian specific diffs for it, even if they are quite a lot?
>We need to get X11 for m68k debianized, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
XFree86 (3.1.2); priority=LOW
Package: (various)
Version: 3.1.2
Package_Revision: (various)
Maintainer: Stephen Early <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
These are minor updates to some of the X packages. xlib and xdevel now
depend on ldso >1.7.14-1 to fix the pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
xsnow (1.40-1); priority=LOW
Package: xsnow
Version: 1.40
Package_Revision: 1
Maintainer: Stephen Early <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: Snow in your X server
xsnow brings Christmas to your X server. A nice waste of CPU time...
Changes:
* cop
Package: wu-ftpd
Version: 2.4-14
xferstats has a bug that shows up when a summary period crosses a year
boundary:
TOTALS FOR SUMMARY PERIOD Mon Jan 1 1996 TO Sun Dec 31 1995
Files Transmitted During Summary Period 3961
Bytes Transmitted During Summary Period1470985346
Systems Using
On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> standards/virtual-package-names-list.text lists:
> X11R6 XFree86 R6, including base system
> xR6shlibXFree86 R6 shared library only
>
> I've put together a package of xterm_color (an xterm that supports
> AN
On Fri, 22 Dec 1995, Bill Mitchell wrote:
> Package: xbase
> Version: 3.1.2
> Package_Revision: 5
>
> Installation of this package fails in preinst on a newly-installed
> 0.93R6 system because /usr/bin/X11 and /usr/lib/X11 do not exist.
> The patch below corrects this problem. However, with this
On Wed, 20 Dec 1995, Simon Shapiro wrote:
> 2. I'd like to throw away the 387 emulation for the compiled kernel.
> Anyone knows why I should keep it there? I do not believe it to be
> necessary for the installation, but i have been wrong before.
The kernel will not boot on systems that don't h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
xsnow (1.40-0); priority=LOW
Package: xsnow
Version: 1.40
Package_Revision: 0
Maintainer: Stephen Early <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: Snow in your X server
xsnow brings Christmas to your X server. A nice waste of CP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
xtrlock (2.0-1); priority=LOW
Package: xtrlock
Version: 2.0
Package_Revision: 1
Maintainer: Stephen Early <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: Minimal X display lock program
xtrlock is a very minimal X display lock program, which uses nothing
except th
On Sun, 17 Dec 1995, Ian Murdock wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 1995, Robert Leslie wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't have noticed these except I found the new xterm didn't log
> > anything into utmp; should this really be the default?
>
> It should log to both utmp *and* wtmp by default. Could this be changed?
I have a mirror of ftp.debian.org on my machine which I am willing to
make available to people in Europe. The mirror is available by anonymous
ftp to myrddin.chu.cam.ac.uk
This mirror will only be available until June 1996.
Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 17 Dec 1995, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> This is a documented bug in the original source---I believe I sent a
> patch that could be used to create a xserver-mach32x or something that
> would be compiled to allow users who wanted to to drive their cards at
> something resembling its capabi
If the new xlib and xdevel packages are installed in the wrong order then
the various *.so symlinks for the new libraries won't be made correctly.
Check that the /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so symlink exists and points to
libX11.so.6, and if it doesn't then re-install xdevel.
This is quite a nasty pr
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, David Engel wrote:
> > Can this be considered to be a bug in ldconfig?
>
> Which part, deleting the link in the first place or not recreating it?
>
> The latter is not a bug. Ldconfig will never create the links needed
> by ld as long as I'm maintaining it.
Deleting someth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
xpilot (3.4.2-1); priority=LOW
Package: xpilot
Version: 3.4.2
Package_Revision: 1
Maintainer: Stephen Early <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: Multi-player tactical game
XPilot is a multi-player tactical manoeuvering game for X and Unix
workstations. P
I've announced them on debian-changes, and they are currently sitting in
the queue on the European upload site.
You should be able to get them from
ftp://myrddin.chu.cam.ac.uk/pub/sde1000/debian/X11 until they arrive at
ftp.debian.org
Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lrzsz
Version: 0.11
myrddin:~$ man lrz
man: ignoring unknown preprocessor `R'
man: ignoring unknown preprocessor `v'
man: ignoring unknown preprocessor `i'
man: ignoring unknown preprocessor `s'
man: ignoring unknown preprocessor `i'
man: ignoring unknown preprocessor `o'
man: ignoring un
Package: netstd
Version: 1.22-1
While heavy NFS access is going on (for example, someone installing
Debian from my NFS-exported mirror), named serves a huge number of
requests which presumably come from nfsd. Should nfsd be performing such
a large number of lookups?
Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, David H. Silber wrote:
> Package: tk40
> Version: 4.0p3-1
>
> This requires elf-x11r6lib, which does not exist. I installed xlib-3.1.2-2,
> which does not seem to provide what I need, but is the latest xlib available.
> I then forced the install of tk40 and found out that I a
Package: cern-httpd
Version: 3.0-4
A user just complained that the httpd log files were empty. It looks like
the new logfiles were created, but httpd carried on writing to the old ones.
Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> I think ncurses wins an award for "most packages from one source archive."
...soon to be trumped by X, which is currently generating 24 packages
from one source archive.
Steve
Was either GCC or binutils (whichever is appropriate) changed between
gcc-2.7.0-2 and gcc-2.7.2-1 or binutils-2.5.2l.20-2 and binutils-2.6-1 so
that it won't find ELF shared libraries with names like libX11.so.6.0,
only libraries with names like libX11.so?
I ask because X has suddenly started s
> Maybe that's it. Maybe 'fgets' is interfering with how scanf works.
> Does it still fail if you remove the 'fgets' from the for loop?
Yes, it still fails. I tried removing the #define from the start of the
string to be matched, though, and it no longer fails. OTOH, the original
program (which i
On Thu, 7 Dec 1995, brian (b.c.) white wrote:
> > for (ksnum=0; 1; c=fgets(buf,sizeof(buf),stdin)) {
>
> The third thing in the "for" structure only gets executed at end of
> the loop. 'c' thus has an undefined value on the first iteration
> which just happened to be NULL for you (hence the "(ni
Package: libc5
Version: 5.2.16-1
(My libc5-dev version is also 5.2.16-1)
The following program (which is similar in structure to one of the
programs used in building xlib) loops forever when it reaches EOF on stdin:
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int ksnum,i;
char buf[1024];
Package: netstd
Version: 1.22-1
myrddin:~$ rusers
garfield.chu.cam.ac. gdm1000 gdm1000 gdm1000
turing.chu.cam.ac.uk djs1012
Segmentation fault
$ rusers
garfield.chu.cam.ac. gdm1000 gdm1000 gdm1000
turing.chu.cam.ac.uk djs1012
tickle.chu.cam.ac.uk apw24
myrddin.chu.cam.ac.u sde1000 gdm1000 pw201
o
On Tue, 28 Nov 1995, David Engel wrote:
> > I've just moved over to the new elf compiler, but am having a problem
> > compiling a program which uses "-lX11". For some reason, none of the
> > symbols are resolved. Here is the output...
>
> You'll need to use the interim elf-x11r6lib package and
On Tue, 28 Nov 1995, Andrew Howell wrote:
> brian writes:
> >
> > I've just moved over to the new elf compiler, but am having a problem
> > compiling a program which uses "-lX11". For some reason, none of the
> > symbols are resolved. Here is the output...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Was there a ch
On Fri, 24 Nov 1995, Andrew Howell wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes:
> > : xtet42 depends on X11R6 and recommends xserver. This is what Ian Murdoch
> > : said all X packages should do.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Second, the whole point of X, to me, is that you can run clients on one
> > machine and a ser
31 matches
Mail list logo
