Boyuan Yang wrote:
> At least someone please adopt nvi first... we cannot introduce a
> package into d-i without a maintainer [2].
>
> Besides, nvi does not have an active upstream.
Ack; or use busybox, as others suggested in the thread.
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I would like to suggest to replace vim-tiny with nano as the default minimal
> editor installed with debootstrap and therefore debian-installer.
Would you consider nvi as an alternative to vim-tiny? It is quite small
and is functional enough to edit the occasiona
Stephan Seitz wrote:
> What would be the replacement for a simple single line like
> iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -s -p tcp –dport 587 ?
You can use the iptables-translate. It is not foolproof and does not
always git the best results, but it can give you a good starting point
for your optimisations
On 2017-07-03 11:41, Maria Bisen wrote:
3- Somebody else, also from Debian, asks the upstream above to bring
back
the xz tarball
4- As a result, lzip is almost never used alone (without xz), and
Debian can
justify forever the lack of lzip support
Hi Maria,
in the example you mentioned upst
4 matches
Mail list logo
