I accept for
> dpkg. b) I'm not sure I like this approach. c) I'm really anal about
> accepting patches.
a) gotcha.
b) Hm... Is there anything wrong with it, or is this a general fear
until code is written?
c) gotcha.
--
Tom Rothamel - http://onegeek.org/~tom/ --- Using GN
27;ll try first, however.)
One other question: Does anyone think having a "never ask about this
config file again" option is a good thing? I'm torn.
--
Tom Rothamel - http://onegeek.org/~tom/ --- Using GNU/Linux
Writing from home, just outside Northport, NY.
The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (87% of Full).
sks those questions, and
that I can override it's defaults... I just want to have all those
questions asked at once at the beginning of the upgrade session,
rather than spread out over the entire unpack process.
--
Tom Rothamel - http://onegeek.org/~tom/ --- Using GNU/Linux
his, which
should go rather quickly, and I'll probably do an ITP for ddiff before
them. (I have the packaging essentially done, but I want to wait to
hear back about some bug reports before a sponsored upload is done.)
Lastly, is there a more appropriate list than debian-devel for
a
On 9 Mar 2000 12:56:29 -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> tom rothamel is working on a project called debdiff that works towards the
> same goal. please read his announcment thread, which is archived at
> http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-0002/msg00391.htm.
The code associated
5 matches
Mail list logo
