>> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us. I considered discussing Etienne's other points in detail, but I doubt this is the appropriate forum. My only concern is that people not spread misinformation about gcj and gij: gcj is not only about native code, it intends to be a complete java environment. It already provides quite a bit toward that goal. Lack of a bytecode interpreter can't be considered as a reason to avoid gcj. (Quality of the interpreter may be, but that is a different sort of discussion.) Tom