On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:39:45PM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
FTP team and I are currently writing a new feature in dak which will
collect changelog entries and store them in projectb, to be later used
for other purposes (e.g. to write point release changelogs, see [1]).
Isn't this
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:37:48PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 20/01/10 at 00:48 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:22:33PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Why spend a lot of time on tasks that provide little benefit, and also
some disadvantages (in some cases,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:36:35 +0100
Source: ipcfg
Binary: ipcfg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:58:09 +0200
Source: ipcfg
Binary: ipcfg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:43:09 +0100
Source: ipcfg
Binary: ipcfg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Hi,
(people not likely to be at FOSDEM in Brussels, Belgium, on the 6th and
7th of February 2010 may skip this mail...)
So, since nothing seemed to be happening for the FOSDEM 2010
distributions miniconference thing, I poked the list a bit, and now
proposals are flowing in. For those interested
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:24:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
I am proposing to set net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 by default for new
installations, to simplify configuration and administration of systems
using IPv6 and to make the system behaviour match the one of all other
operating systems, which
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:39:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's no reason that ucf *should* fall under either of these rules; so
even if ucf /didn't/ work the way it does, the right solution here would be
to fix it
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:10:41AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 15:50:37 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
For those of you who were waiting for a call for talks from me on this
subject, it's not really coming. However, if you think your talk may be
of some interest
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:20:03AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
It has been suggested on IRC that having dpkg-source switch back to
native mode if it can't find the .orig tarball was probably a bad idea
from the beginning and that it tends to confuse people. However,
with the addition of new
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 07:54:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Sorry, but I cannot disclose what is told to me in private.
Yes you can, you just cannot do it without announcing it beforehand to
the parties involved.
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:56:48 +0100
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.14-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Dear developers,
I respectfully submit this general resolution proposal to your consideration.
(this GR proposal supersedes the proposal in
20090318235044.ga30...@yellowpig)
Asking for seconds,
(please CC me)
Bill.
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, ifupd...@packages.debian.org
Hi all,
As you may or may not know, I've been working on an alternative
implementation of ifup and ifdown, which I call 'ipcfg', for a few
months now[1]. The code is now nearly at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:24:17 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:21:25 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.13-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:40:51PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Debian Policy has a more formal process than developers-reference and
I am concerned that mixing both discussions on the same channel would cause
confusion.
debian-de...@l.d.o could be a better channel for the
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:46:08AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On native package the debian/changelog is also used for upstream
changelog: upstreams tend to package their packages as native.
[...]
Thus non debian specific package, which are also native,
should (must on GPL licensed
Sigh.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
That doesn't follow. You're assuming it's going to be impossible to keep
the original debian/changelog file, and/or that the only way to package
something that an upstream has packaged as native
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 13, Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org wrote:
246 packages failed to build with 'Error 13' at the end of the log,
It's a big number. Can you add a temporary workaround for a few
months until most packages are fixed?
Er, why would
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:05:32PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
If you want to test this feature in testing or unstable, use this
command:
echo CONCURRENCY=makefile /etc/default/rcS
It will enable makefile style concurrency, and run N scripts in
parallel during boot, where N is
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 02:15:43PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I don't find the existing behavior confusing, especially since there
is -submitter@
The problem with the -submitter@ mail alias is that it does not get
changed in the forward, so that when a submitter hits 'reply' in his
MUA, he
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 01:50:45PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 15:14:21 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
As of today, debian does not contain this bug, because ffmpeg with this
brakage happened not to be uploaded yet to debian. However, once it is,
the bug
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:22:30AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
We have a lot of troubles when upstreams ship a debian/ directory
in upstream tarball, thus I'll expect derivatives will have similar
problems
I don't see it that way.
The reason why we have 'a lot of troubles' when
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:43:30PM +0200, Mateusz Fiołka wrote:
Hi,
I am on of the Tigase XMPP server developers. Tigase is written purely
in Java and is meant to be high performing, scalable and extensible.
Some time ago one of our users contributed deb packages. There is even
an
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:09:01PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
From the changelog:
* Upstream has abandoned the program, so the package is now Debian
native.
Switching upstreams does not make a package native.
How so? There is no reason why a package where the upstream and the
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 01:31:40AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Le Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 12:47:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
I know it is fancy and modern to think that Debian native packages
should only be used for things that are specific
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 10:04:49PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
True. However, if something is not explicitly forbidden by Policy (and
this isn't), and it does not cause (obvious) harm to Debian as a whole
(which this doesn't), there is no good reason why people should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:25:54 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.13-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:16:49 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.13-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Description:
beid-tools - SmartCard utilities from the OpenSC project, compiled against lib
beidgui- application to read out information from the Belgian electronic I
libbeid2
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:38:54AM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2009-07-21, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
The long wait is the signing, not the dinstall run. Even without
accepted dinstall runs 4 times a day now.
But I have to say I'm totaly against unsigned uploads. The
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:40:17AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Am Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:18:23 +0100
schrieb Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net:
If other libraries are including this library, then why is libmysqld
not being provided as a properly-versioned shared object?
Upstream, in this
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:17:28AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Wouter Verhelst]
Whether we should recommend using static libraries is another matter
entirely; indeed performance does go down a teeny weeny bit when using
shared libraries, but the difference shouldn't be *that* large
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:22:07PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi [2009.07.21.1527 +0200]:
piuparts is _intended_ to be run by every uploader, actually. Or
at least that was my intention back when I wrote it.
Okay, that wasn't my impression, sorry for
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 03:45:13PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2009-07-18, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
Ah, so this is about not interfering with testing migration, I guess?
It's not only testing migration. As an example: If you have a large chain
of binNMUs which all need
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Description:
flash-kernel - utility to make certain embedded devices bootable
flash-kernel-installer - Make the system bootable (udeb)
Changes:
flash-kernel (2.20) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add support for Lanner EM7210 and compatibles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:25:26 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Michael Biebl]
Would it make sense to avoid the upload of obviously broken
packages from buildds in the future. E.g. if lintian detects an
error it would need some special inspection from the buildd uploader.
Don't all
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:19:50AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Not? Was the originally uploaded package correct? Amazing. Hm. Then,
it should be lintian errors that denote a build as a failure, indeed,
and these should somehow be detected by the mechanism that uploads the
packages ... not by
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:19:50AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Not? Was the originally uploaded package correct? Amazing. Hm. Then,
it should be lintian errors that denote a build as a failure, indeed
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:10:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Right. However, having sbuild run lintian would allow a buildd
maintainer to assess issues with packages by looking at *warnings*,
rather than 'just' errors. This isn't something an automated system can
do
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:05:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:10:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Right. However, having sbuild run lintian would allow a buildd
maintainer to assess issues with packages by looking at *warnings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:18:51 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 06:00:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:52:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Even if this were true (which I doubt), I'm quite certain that whether
or not you use your real name on a piece of software has any relevance
whatsoever
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:24:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi c...@cateee.net writes:
A naive question: why does not FSF check identity of contributors?
They must sign a copyright assignment (or disclaimer), send this
document to FSF, but I see no identity check on FSF
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:53:11AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
I'm finding it difficult to believe the argument oh, but this isn't
going to be mandatory.
I don't know anyone making the argument that there should *never* be a
mandatory machine
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:30:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:10:56PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
If the sole purpose of the format is to have a machine-parseable format,
if it doesn't apply to all packages, then the fact that it is
machine-parseable is useless,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:42:25 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:15:16 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.9.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 08:07:16PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Kel Modderman wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:35:06 Jan Wagner wrote:
while thinking about how to solve #508189, where I need to change the
position of the initscript in bootorder, I thought
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:59:25AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:30:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I made a short overview of this on the wiki, at
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debbugs/ArchchitectureTags
Got an extra ch in there?
That was pointed out on IRC, too
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:03:26PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Now almost a month ago, I asked Don Armstrong to create architecture
tags in the BTS. I've always felt that such a thing would be useful,
because often porters are unaware of architecture-specific bugs, simply
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:17:01AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 21, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
While 1.6% is indeed a rather small amount, I wouldn't call 1340 people
'trivial'.
I do, since I expect that most of these are using sarge or worse.
There's no proof
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:53:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Bernd Zeimetz:
Being able to rename an interface without messing with udev is a
feature, not a bug.
I think you can't rename most
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:53:19AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 20, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
It is still possible to install and run Lenny without the use of udev,
and many people do so.
popcon shows that the number is trivial. Definitely not many.
popcon tells me
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:53:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Bernd Zeimetz:
Being able to rename an interface without messing with udev is a
feature, not a bug.
I think you can't rename most interfaces after the boot process
anyway. Or has the kernel been changed and can rename
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:07:29PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 15, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Being able to rename an interface without messing with udev is a
feature, not a bug.
Every relevant Linux distribution requires udev, and so do many
important features of Debian
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:05:53AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
You can do this with ethtool now, and more cleanly:
link-speed 100
link-duplex full
Yes, I know. But that means that existing working configurations have
to be modified.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:45:24AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Do den 5. Mär 2009 um 9:48 schrieb Bastian Blank:
severity 419209 important
It is critical as it breaks the whole system! I do not want to start a
severity war with you but please do not set the severity to wrong level.
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 12:58:20AM -0800, Bill Unruh wrote:
OK, good. So if Jorg were to dual license libscg, this would be
sufficient for Debian to believe that they are able to distribute it?
This is far weaker than the demand that all of the software be dual
licensed or GPLed. Whether or
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:09:29PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
You are uninformed: libc on Linux is under LGPL and the LGPL is as
incompatible to GPL as the CDDL is incomparible to the GPL.
Er?
-
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007
[...]
7. Additional Terms.
Additional
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 02:14:41PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Attacks from Debian against the cdrtools project caused the license to be
changed. Debian now needs to live with this change.
We have. We forked cdrtools, as is perfectly okay with most open source
projects.
--
Lo-lan-do Home
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 02:57:23PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue Mar 03 14:14, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Attacks from Debian against the cdrtools project caused the license to be
changed. Debian now needs to live with this change.
We do
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:41:40PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:09:29PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
You are uninformed: libc on Linux is under LGPL and the LGPL is as
incompatible to GPL as the CDDL is incomparible
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:58:34PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Attacks from Debian against the cdrtools project caused the license to be
changed. Debian now needs to live with this change.
Unfortunately it is not Debian who have to live with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:51:16 +0100
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:2.9.11-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:03:37 +0100
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:2.9.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:32:07PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
That depends on what you mean by a multiarch Blu-ray image. The
inherent nastiness of the HFS hybrid code means that we probably won't
be able to produce BD images including powerpc at all. BD boot code is
identical to that on CD
: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Description:
beid-tools - SmartCard utilities from the OpenSC project, compiled against lib
beidgui- application to read out information from the Belgian electronic I
libbeid2
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 09:55:36PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I wish we could have in the world of GNU/Linux one, just one,
please--just one--distribution which really took free software as of
cardinal importance. Debian has promised to be that, while living up to
the promise only in
Hi,
Sven asked me to forward this message to the list. Since it does not
contain any of the vitriol for which he was expelled from the project,
and since it does contain some valid points on the discussion in
question, I decided to comply with his request.
I'd like to say, though, that this does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:54:50 +0100
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:2.9.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:57:06 +0200
Source: recoverjpeg
Binary: recoverjpeg
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.1.1-1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:00:31PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Once the move has been completed we expect to make gluck restricted to
the people operating the services that will remain on gluck, so please
clean out your homedir when you no longer need it there.
So what's going to happen with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:30:52 +0200
Source: recoverjpeg
Binary: recoverjpeg
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.1.1-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Russ Allbery]
It's not *impossible*... someone could be running the scripts from the
package without having the package installed. I don't know why they'd do
that, though, or whether that's a more plausible explanation
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:05:49AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that Bdale
came up with during Debconf that we write a hardware compatibility test
of sorts that hardware vendors could run on their own hardware
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that Bdale
Yes, I find the talk very interesting.
So, after more than twelve hours of boredom on an airplane and half a
night
Hi,
As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that Bdale
came up with during Debconf that we write a hardware compatibility test
of sorts that hardware vendors could run on their own hardware to test
whether Debian works on their system. The rationale for such a test:
while most
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:10:28PM +0200, Francisco Moya wrote:
[...]
Debian Policy only knows as much as what we put in it. Therefore it
isn't almighty, and it *certainly* isn't a stick to beat people with, as
you're trying to do here. The fact that some insanity isn't in
policy doesn't
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:51:08PM +0200, FRANCISCO MOYA FERNANDEZ wrote:
I already know that people do also build their own packages, thanks. You do
not need to rewire the debian/rules in order to build zeroc-ice binary-arch
packages but AFAIK in your PowerPC you cannot currently build
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:29:53AM +0200, Francisco Moya wrote:
Hi,
I've uploaded a new version of zeroc-ice packages which essentially
falls back to target build-arch whenever the autobuilder tries the build
target on architectures other than i386. I hope the Build-Options
control field
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:10:07 +0200
Source: logtool
Binary: logtool
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2.8-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:15:28AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 02:42 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
For discussion:
Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are the the top three desktops used in debian and
cover most users of desktops in debian.
They all use xdg
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:56:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Actually, should udev be killed at all when switching to single user
mode?
I don't think so. Single user mode is for sysadmin tasks and I'd say that
the udev daemon should be running for those as performing
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:28:51AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Seems like this script really belongs in the examples directory.
IMHO it is an RFC requirement, however the solution with a synchronous
Eh, that does not parse. Either it is a matter of
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
I think being LSB compliant is good for Debian.
That may be so; but changing a long-standing interface with no migration
is /not/ good for Debian.
--
Lo-lan-do Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel,
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
beid-tools - SmartCard utilities from the OpenSC project, compiled against lib
beidgui- application to read out information from the Belgian electronic I
libbeid2
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
beid-tools - SmartCard utilities from the OpenSC project, compiled against lib
beidgui- application to read out information from the Belgian electronic I
libbeid2
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:35:32AM +0200, jaromil wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
re all,
right now a lot of people is relying on debian for server setups, very
serious stuff :|
if you think to replace something so crucial as a network based CLI
tool and its
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:31:49AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
where a grave bug (bug #479607) is unlikely fixable without severe
refactoring of
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:49:40PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
OTOH, aren't most of these choosing
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:36:55PM +0100, Martin Meredith wrote:
Hi there.
I currently maintain rar and unrar-nonfree in debian.
When uscanning for the latest version of rar - it started to download
the x64 version, which I haven't seen before.
Anyway - It seems that upstream are now
Hi,
Currently dbus' initscript, when invoked with the stop, start, or
restart arguments, will also restart services that depend on dbus. I
think this is broken, but in an IRC discussion, Sjoerd Simons, one of
the maintainers disagreed. My arguments:
There are three cases where an initscript is
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:44:06PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:34:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
- Stuff is broken, and I want to debug. This debugging might involve
stopping and starting services one at a time. The current dbus setup
makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 21:22:53 +0200
Source: nbd
Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:2.9.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:59:39PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 06/04/2008, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
automatic build of wengophone [1] on arm failed because of a GCC
internal compiler error. Who should I ask to request a retry of the
build?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, if the reason
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Neat project. I am not sure why being able to install 3.0r3 rather than
3.0r6 is necesarily very useful, but it is neat to have the choice.
To have reproducibility of installations, where such is necessary (e.g.,
software escrow
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello,
I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
files Packages.gz, Packages.bz2, Sources.gz, Sources.bz2 and
Release from the directories
/debian/dists/${RELEASE}/main/binary-${ARCH}/
801 - 900 of 2004 matches
Mail list logo
