Re: Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Yotam Rubin
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:53:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Yotam Rubin writes: > > Greetings, > > > > The last libsafe upload has been over a year ago. Since then, libsafe > > has accumulated a large number of bugs. The current Debian release doesn't >

Request to NMU libsafe

2001-12-27 Thread Yotam Rubin
an/libsafe/ Can someone NMU that? I've contacted the maintainer but received no reply. It's a shame that libsafe wouldn't be usable for Debian users. Regards, Yotam Rubin

Re: spammer attached to debian-bugs-dist?

2001-09-12 Thread Yotam Rubin
Yes, after submitting a bug against krolden, I immediately received this automatic reply. Pretty damn annoying. Regards, Yotam Rubin On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 10:41:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hello, > > I received this autoresponse to two different messages I sen

Re: chroot bind?

2001-04-24 Thread Yotam Rubin
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:44:05PM +0200, Jean Charles Delepine wrote: > Yotam Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We could harden the default configuration with the following directives: > > > > options { > > version 'Not available'; >

Re: chroot bind?

2001-04-23 Thread Yotam Rubin
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:29:17PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 22, Yotam Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I disagree. A lot of the vulnerability scanners out there determine whether > >a host is susceptible to a certain bug by looking at its version.bi

Re: chroot bind?

2001-04-22 Thread Yotam Rubin
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 06:23:43PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 21, Yotam Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >We could harden the default configuration with the following directives: > > > >version 'Not available'; > This does not