signals and atomicity

1998-04-17 Thread erikyyy
hi, i found the following code in apache web server code. if the signal occurs after the wait system call, but before the result of the system call is stored in "wait_or_timeout_retval", the fact, that the system call succeeded is lost. this is (1) a bug in apache and (2) a problem of me that i w

realtime lock bug in linuxthreads

1998-04-17 Thread erikyyy
e nothing to do with locking the system, so this is a bug! it makes it quite impossible to use realtime threads in linux. (works only as root user) byebye erik -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_ IRC: erikyyy

Re: signals and atomicity

1998-04-19 Thread erikyyy
all. it is extremly important, that signalthread_B doesn't get lost, i.e. B just doesn't get the EINTR. byebye Erik -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_ IRC: erikyyy/ __8 WWW: http://wwwcip.rus.

Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread erikyyy
h libcs at the same time, without any LD_* environment variables. what to do? byebye Erik -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_ IRC: erikyyy/ __8 WWW: http://wwwcip.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/~inf24628/ ' ` h

Re: signals and atomicity

1998-04-23 Thread erikyyy
cess to interrupt another processes next system call, __that is marked as interruptible (whatever this means)__. the interrupt __mustn't get lost__. afterwards i must always know, wether the system call succeeded, or not. i find no way of doing it. this is why i said "the whole system is sh

Re: signals and atomicity

1998-04-23 Thread erikyyy
t) does not work. the problem cannot be solved without using siglongjmp(). i am sure, the problem cannot be solved with this library+operating system :-( (or does anyone know some assembler hacks ?) byebye Erik -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

21164 must be fixed before 2.0.34 comes out!

1998-04-24 Thread erikyyy
hope one of you knows the right person to fix the problem. if the bug won't be fixed in 2.0.34, you will not be able to do realtime threads in 2.0.34. byebye Erik -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_

Re: 21164 must be fixed before 2.0.34 comes out!

1998-04-25 Thread erikyyy
led this shows, that you have the bug installed on your system :-) -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_ IRC: erikyyy/ __8 WWW: http://wwwcip.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/~inf24628/

consistency check

1998-04-25 Thread erikyyy
rubbish is gone. byebye Erik -- EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_ IRC: erikyyy/ __8 WWW: http://wwwcip.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/~inf24628/ ' ` http://tick.informatik.u

dpkg-http and proxy cache

1998-05-05 Thread erikyyy
non-US/'}="hamm/binary-i386"; $use_authorization_basic = 0; $auth_user = ""; $auth_passwd = ""; $dldir = "debian"; 1; + SNAP dpkg-http 0.14 dpkg1.4.0.22 my system is quite updated hamm 2.0 with i386 byeb