or so arches officially, and a bunch of
other unofficially, surelly this would not be so expensive for us.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
, and doesn't mention the second
advantage, which is a bit difficult to express in a simple phrase
anyway.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:04:24AM -0600, Eric Schwartz wrote:
On Thursday, Jun 19, 2003, at 00:30 America/Denver, Sven Luther wrote:
I have almost a ready package, i just now need a fine short
description.
How about:
simple audio player with detachable GUI
Mmm,
It's not perfect, I
with it ? I thougt the proposal was only yo
remove the old libc5 libraries, not their libc6 version, which
zlib1g-dev is (because of the g and everything).
But then maybe i am missing something.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:39:25PM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
On Thursday 19 June 2003 08:30, Sven Luther wrote:
The upstream author is not so happy about the FIFO controlled stuff,
since it sounds as if using quark is difficult.
Right, the FIFO(implementation) is irrelevant for most
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 2.4.20-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ide-modules-2.4.20-powerpc-udeb - IDE drivers (udeb)
kernel-headers-2.4.20 - Header files related to a specific
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: quark
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : Ben Jansens [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Moynes [EMAIL
PROTECTED], Nick Jansens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://quark.nerdnest.org/
* License
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:58:44PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:21:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Quark is an audio player, for geeks, by geeks. It runs in the
background with access provided via a FIFO in the filesystem.
It uses GStreamer for playing music
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:26:32PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
Yep, i took the one from the Quark 3.0 announce, which i suppose was the
one of a previous version and should have been replaced by the one from
the web site.
Also, you could remove
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:46:44PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi.
Sven Luther wrote:
Also, you could remove the leading an from the short description,
as recommended by the developer's reference.
Description: audio player, for geeks, by geeks.
Mmm, doesn't sound all
by 3.07 until 3.07 is ready to enter
testing.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 11:52:10 +0200
Source: ocaml
Binary: ocaml-native-compilers ocaml-base ocaml ocaml-source
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.06-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 09:40:07 +0200
Source: hardware-monitor
Binary: hardware-monitor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL
-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libgtop2 - Libraries for gtop system monitoring library (part of Gnome 2)
libgtop2-daemon - gtop daemon for monitoring remote machines (part of Gnome 2)
libgtop2-dev - Dev libraries for gtop system monitoring library (part of Gnome 2
Closes
they use the former FireGL GPU. The drivers from
ATI fill the gap to support FireGL, and yes they are better. They
can be used with Maya etc.. [at least it says that on ATI's site.]
R1x0 and R2x0 are supported in XFree86 4.3.0. Radeon R3x0 are not
though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
pci ids though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
,
Sven Luther
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:23:27AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:00:06PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
We could get around Guido's point mentionned above by having a list of
default patches to apply, which would by default contain the debian
patch.
Yes, but then the
patch without any order
dependency.
Why don't we use a scheme similar to what xfree86 use for its patches.
Sure we would need to adapt it as the patches are distributed, but we
could well do it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:05:02AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
Geordies' sources amount to anything more
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 03:24:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-05-16 13:33]:
Such a package should be as close to possible to the version actually
in testing, and not depend on packages and/or versions that are not
yet in testing.
So, you
ask for than a debconf on a beach?
And it must be way cheaper too.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
).
What is the rpath you are removing ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the world over, exporting their depression with the
low dollar value, and so on. Maybe you are not so adverse of hurting
other people's family in order to protect yours ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
of James Bond movies ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
projects,
response time to requests needs to be MUCH faster. At the current
state of affairs, the time spent with writing the request has been a
total waste.
Well, you could have used the bugreport as interim mailing list :)))
Friendly,
Sven Luther
to check if they would cause problems or not on their arch.
Ideally, the security patches could even be isolated for each problem
they solve, a bit like the patches to the xfree86 package Branden has
been using all this time.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the point? How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about
the U.S. governments acts or positions?
I think he meant the war against terrorists, which could potentially
include anyone as ennemy.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
, and the results published only after
the election is closed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:09:43AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
knowledge
A situation where a vote would be successful, but fail for lack of
participation
get Wouter Verhelst an older Amiga 1200 with mtec 68030
accelerator board. Would it somehow be possible to get some kind of
debian money for the shipping of it or something such ? And if yes, what
would be the procedure to ask about it ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
.
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:48:00AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Est-ce qu'il y a déjà une estimation pour le prix de la solution
camping car, et de la durée su trajet ?
Paris-Oslo, cela
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 02:41:18PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A quel endroit traverse-t-on la mer ?
Je suis pas sur, d'apres mon plan, on peut soit traverser avec un fery
...
Quels serait les dates de depart/retour prevu ?
Merci pour les
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 02:41:18PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A quel endroit traverse-t-on la mer ?
Je suis pas sur, d'apres mon plan, on peut soit traverser avec un fery
...
Quels serait les dates de depart/retour prevu ?
Merci pour les
needed one. You
wouldn't need to be running testing as your main system either.
And beside, i think IBM can give you an account on one of those.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
mistaken?
What it gains you ? It gains you being able to upload to one of the
official repositories (testing-proposed-updates for example) and have
your packages autobuilt on all arches, which is a prerequisite for them
to go into testing and be usefull.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
in the ACK. The
current setup is fine for single digit options i guess, but it is a bit
hard to read when there are two digits.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:30:36PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:07:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
But we don't advertize this, so it is natural that people make the
mistake and use testing instead of unstable.
People say this all the time. Then other people go
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:01:54PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
[Removed debian-private from Cc-List, there is *no* need to duplicate
the thread there]
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:58:44AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
2) a way for people for which stable is too outdated to run more
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:36:38PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:15:48PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but before someone steps for and does this, a consensus need to be
found on what to do, the RM at least has to green-light it, and it
should be announced
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 02:44:28PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:13:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The only thing really needed here is the RM's blessing, and an
announcement.
I have no idea how you might think this announcement should look like.
Could you perhaps
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 02:52:15PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
So, what have we got here?
Three theses:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:13:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
1.
Well, the documentation says that there is no security for testing,
2.
but it does not say that the security
it is natural that people make the
mistake and use testing instead of unstable.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
/build-tool stuff,
and the other for the rest of the packages. But then, this is a
discussion for another time.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
that what you say is wrong, just that people are not aware
of it, because we did tell them differently back then.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
be wrong.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
for
end users? Well-timed unstable snapshots are often more 'stable' than
commercial Linux releases, in my limited experience.
Because we give them the impression that testing is more adapted to them
than unstable.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Take the harden package, or create
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000
to machines of all the supported arches ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
snapshot.debian.org, or whatever the link of it is.
Anybody can access that, but again, it is not widely publicized.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:16:39PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
You again forget that debian is not x86 only, or do you expect Matthias
to have access to machines of all the supported arches ?
Right.
Besides, I don't want to do this on my own, I want to do
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
No, it's sitting there, waiting for someone to use it. After a year's
neglect it might need some metaphorical oil on its hinges and some
, testing becomes completely
pointless, as I see it.
Why ? is the migration from testing-proposed-update to testing follow
the same rule as the unstable to testing migration, nothing is lost.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:07:53AM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-05-14 10:11] :
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:31:11AM +0200, Michel Grentzinger wrote:
Le Mercredi 14 Mai 2003 08:40, Marc Lorber a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Ce n'est
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-05-07 12:18]:
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:44:54AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
But they *should* read the bug mail they receive, and I guess that was
Michaels point. If they don't read
with stable. However, the security secretaries
will try to fix problems in testing and unstable after they are fixed in the
stable release.
What is missing is a statement warning users that testing is less secure
than unstable.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
that there may be security issues, or
more precisely, that the security issues are orders of magnitude worse
than even what is in sid.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:31:53AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:35:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but this is not something that is clearly said. Many people run
testing without even being aware that there may be security issues, or
more precisely
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 07:09:22PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
http://qa.debian.org/
En espérant avoir répondu à votre question,
Je crois que le lien adequat est :
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
Linker depuis la page
as uninstallable.
2) maybe list both the package that is trying to enter testing and
(between parentheses or something) the packages that they would break.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
3-5 W or something such, but i hear the
750Fx used in the ibooks consumes even less.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-randr-applet
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Matthew Allum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://handhelds.org/~mallum/downloadables/grandr_applet-0.2.tar.gz
* License
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
On Sun, 2003-04-27 at 08:18, Sven Luther wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-randr-applet
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Matthew Allum
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-sensors
Version : 0.9c
Upstream Author : Vinicius Kursancew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.vkcorp.org/gsensors/
* License : GPL
Description : A GNOME2
/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01065.html
For more detail.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
. What's wrong?
or this message, which was the one i wanted to post in the previous mail :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01063.html
Friendly,
Sven Luther
of those
bugs, would it not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:11:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:11:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I CCed you the bugreport where i explain everything, but the packages are :
libpgsql-ocaml
ocamlsdl
These are the source packages.
You missed:
ocaml-core
/extension packages.
And will the fact that postgresql provides binding for both python and
perl not imply that perl cannot enter testing unless python and
postgresql does also, and any permutation of them ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:11:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:11:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I CCed you the bugreport where i explain everything, but the packages are :
libpgsql-ocaml
ocamlsdl
These are the source packages.
You missed:
ocaml-core
. And as said, i get weekly
inquiries about what is going on.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:33:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, i personnaly think that in some case it would be much simpler to
_remove_ the packages from testing, and let the new versions enter
testing as they can.
Yes
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:17:41AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:05:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:33:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, i personnaly think that in some
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:31:44PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
depth, i cannot help all that much about
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:07:26PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:11:17AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
lintian says:
W: planets: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/planets
/usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
and the 105 or so packages that will be breaken by its inclusion in
testing, many of them have
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:39:51AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:55:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, but it is better than having our
way is not to strip it, but to not add it to start with, and this means
patching the ocaml build suite.
And for this, i need to take the time to look at this specific issue,
understand it well and so on.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
So, why is the new libvrobis
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:40:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mar 15/04/2003 à 08:55, Sven Luther a écrit :
Well, i don't really care about those packages, it is just that this
will hold up any packages which depend on libvorbis (post 0a). I could
try rebuilding those packages
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:10:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
It could be a nice solution to this kind
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:21:15AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 02:42, Sven Luther wrote:
* chromium : 1 RC bug, out of date on arm.
Note this RC bug is tagged sarge so it doesn't really apply. The only
thing holding this back is the arm autobuilder which I'm hoping
inquiries about it (be it in the negative) in bug report
#187155.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
in testing.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
and just needs a rebuild, but the unstable version is not
considered for this, since it depends on a huge amount of other (broken)
packages.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:44:40PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, do you know if uploading a package to testing-update will be
considered by the testing scripts if the unstable version is a new
version and/or too buggy and such ? This would be a neat way to
rebuilding
related to packaging ocaml stuff, and i
will CC this mail there, where you may want to subscribe if you are
going to maintain ocaml related stuff.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:10:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ideally the testing script should be modified to output more verbose
data, but i don't speak perl.
That's no excuse, since it's (nowadays) written in Python. :)
Well
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:05:52PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
depth, i cannot help all that much about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 22:48:07 +0200
Source: hardware-monitor
Binary: hardware-monitor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:11:11 +0200
Source: hardware-monitor
Binary: hardware-monitor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL
construire ton noyau, n'est-ce pas ?
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:52:07 +0100
Source: lablgl
Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:04:36 +0100
Source: lablgtk2
Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.beta.20030314-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:38:09 +0100
Source: lablgl
Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:31:06 +0100
Source: lablgl
Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 13:44:15 +0100
Source: lablgl
Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven
801 - 900 of 1016 matches
Mail list logo
